Wed Dec 20 09:35:40 PST 2006
There are 4700 lines in ppfof_full.txt
There are 702 lines in decfull.txt
There are 36359 words in ppfof_full.txt
There are 34107 words in decfull.txt
34107 < 34108
Match 1 (1): Reference (000344 .. 000359, of 36359): Subject (024572 .. 024586, of 34107):
June 2004 Board Meetings Buckingham and Other Board Members Spoke Out in Favor of Teaching Creationism June 2004 Board Meetings Buckingham and Other Board Members Spoke in Favor of Teaching Creationism
Match 2 (1): Reference (000389 .. 000400, of 36359): Subject (026374 .. 026382, of 34107):
July 2004 Buckingham Contacted Rchard Thompson of the Thomas More Law Center July 2004 Buckingham contacted the Thomas More Law Center
Match 3 (1): Reference (000439 .. 000452, of 36359): Subject (026554 .. 026568, of 34107):
August 2004 Buckingham and Others Tried to Prevent Purchase of the Standard Biology Textbook August 2004 Buckingham and Other Board Members Tried to Prevent Purchase of Standard Biology Textbook
Match 4 (1): Reference (000477 .. 000493, of 36359): Subject (027200 .. 027214, of 34107):
August 30 2004 The Board Curriculum Committee Forced Pandas on the Teachers as a Reference Text O August 30 2004 Board Curriculum Committee Forced Pandas on the Teachers as Reference Text On
Match 5 (1): Reference (000511 .. 000522, of 36359): Subject (028075 .. 028085, of 34107):
P October 7 2004 The Board Curriculum Committee Drafted the Curriculum Change Policy m October 7 2004 Board Curriculum Committee Drafted Curriculum Change
Match 6 (1): Reference (001044 .. 001054, of 36359): Subject (005058 .. 005068, of 34107):
who has written extensively on the subject of evolution and religion who has written extensively on the subject of evolution and religion
Match 7 (1): Reference (001104 .. 001165, of 36359): Subject (005079 .. 005144, of 34107):
is not a new scientific argument but rather an old religious argument for the existence of God This argument traces back at least to Thomas Aquinas in the 13 th century who framed the argument as a syllogism Wherever complex design exists there must have been a designer nature is complex therefore nature must have had an intelligent designer 9 1 Haught is not a new scientific argument but is rather an old religious argument for the existence of God He traced this argument back to at least Thomas Aquinas in the 13 th century who framed the argument as a syllogism Wherever complex design exists there must have been a designer nature is complex therefore nature must have had an intelligent designer Trial Tr vol 9 Haught
Match 8 (1): Reference (001166 .. 001181, of 36359): Subject (005151 .. 005166, of 34107):
Dr Haught testified that Aquinas was explicit that this intelligent designer everyone understands to be God Dr Haught testified that Aquinas was explicit that this intelligent designer everyone understands to be God
Match 9 (1): Reference (001185 .. 001196, of 36359): Subject (005168 .. 005179, of 34107):
The syllogism described by Dr Haught is essentially the same argument for The syllogism described by Dr Haught is essentially the same argument for
Match 10 (1): Reference (001199 .. 001235, of 36359): Subject (005182 .. 005220, of 34107):
presented by Professors Behe and Minnich employing the phrase purposeful arrangement of parts o 3 Dr Haught testified that this argument for the existence of God was advanced early in the 19 th Century by Reverend Paley presented by defense expert witnesses Professors Behe and Minnich who employ the phrase purposeful arrangement of parts Dr Haught testified that this argument for the existence of God was advanced early in the 19 th century by Reverend Paley
Match 11 (1): Reference (001251 .. 001265, of 36359): Subject (005234 .. 005249, of 34107):
based on purposeful arrangement of parts is the same one that Paley made for design based on the purposeful arrangement of parts is the same one that Paley made for design
Match 12 (1): Reference (001305 .. 001320, of 36359): Subject (005272 .. 005288, of 34107):
o 4 The only apparent difference between the argument made by Paley and the argument for Nov 4 2005 The only apparent difference between the argument made by Paley and the argument for
Match 13 (1): Reference (001318 .. 001328, of 36359): Subject (018907 .. 018924, of 34107):
the argument for intelligent design as expressed by Behe and Minnich the purportedly positive argument for design encompassed in the phrase used numerous times by Professors Behe and Minnich
Match 14 (1): Reference (001333 .. 001344, of 36359): Subject (005302 .. 005313, of 34107):
s official position does not acknowledge that the designer is God However s official position does not acknowledge that the designer is God However
Match 15 (1): Reference (001354 .. 001373, of 36359): Subject (005315 .. 005335, of 34107):
Dr Haught testified anyone familiar with western religious thought would immediately make the association that the unnamed designer is God Dr Haught testified anyone familiar with Western religious thought would immediately make the association that the tactically unnamed designer is God
Match 16 (1): Reference (001377 .. 001386, of 36359): Subject (005338 .. 005352, of 34107):
description of the designer in Pandas as a master intellect description of the designer in Of Pandas and People hereinafter Pandas is a master intellect
Match 17 (1): Reference (001395 .. 001405, of 36359): Subject (005361 .. 005371, of 34107):
any intelligent actor known to exist in the natural world Professors any intelligent actor known to exist in the natural world P
Match 18 (1): Reference (001413 .. 001431, of 36359): Subject (005386 .. 005405, of 34107):
their personal view that the designer is God and Professor Minnich testified that he understands many leading advocates of their personal view is that the designer is God and Professor Minnich testified that he understands many leading advocates of
Match 19 (1): Reference (001466 .. 001482, of 36359): Subject (005422 .. 005441, of 34107):
proponents occasionally suggest that the designer could be a space alien or a time traveling cell biologist proponents of the IDM occasionally suggest that the designer could be a space alien or a time traveling cell biologist
Match 20 (1): Reference (001506 .. 001550, of 36359): Subject (005489 .. 005527, of 34107):
is made explicit in Pandas when it asks rhetorically what kind of intelligent agent was it the designer and answers On its own science cannot answer this question It must leave it to religion and philosophy P11 at 7 emphasis added 9 13 14 Haught is Pandas rhetorical statement what kind of intelligent agent was it the designer and answer On its own science cannot answer this question It must leave it to religion and philosophy P 11 at 7 9 13 14 Haught
Match 21 (1): Reference (001600 .. 001614, of 36359): Subject (005557 .. 005570, of 34107):
proponents similarly reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity proponents reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity
Match 22 (1): Reference (001653 .. 001666, of 36359): Subject (005585 .. 005610, of 34107):
Creationism s Trojan Horse and other writings and for her testimony in this case Creationism s Trojan Horse She has thoroughly and exhaustively chronicled the history of ID in her book and other writings for her testimony in this case
Match 23 (1): Reference (001694 .. 001704, of 36359): Subject (005632 .. 005646, of 34107):
s religious philosophical and cultural content The following are representative a s religious philosophical and cultural content The following is a representative grouping of such statements
Match 24 (1): Reference (001706 .. 001716, of 36359): Subject (005682 .. 005696, of 34107):
Johnson has written that theistic realism or mere creation are the on Trial has written that theistic realism or mere creation are defining concepts of the
Match 25 (1): Reference (001706 .. 001720, of 36359): Subject (005682 .. 005696, of 34107):
Johnson has written that theistic realism or mere creation are the defining concepts of the on Trial has written that theistic realism or mere creation are defining concepts of the
Match 26 (1): Reference (001724 .. 001741, of 36359): Subject (005698 .. 005720, of 34107):
This means that God is objectively real as Creator and recorded in the biological evidence 10 80 81 This means that God is objectively real as Creator and recorded in the biological evidence Trial Tr vol 10 Forrest Test 80 81
Match 27 (1): Reference (001724 .. 001742, of 36359): Subject (005698 .. 005717, of 34107):
This means that God is objectively real as Creator and recorded in the biological evidence 10 80 81 Forrest This means that God is objectively real as Creator and recorded in the biological evidence Trial Tr vol 10 Forrest
Match 28 (1): Reference (001745 .. 001793, of 36359): Subject (005728 .. 005776, of 34107):
Phillip Johnson states that the Darwinian theory of evolution contradicts not just the Book of Genesis but every word in the Bible from beginning to end It contradicts the idea that we are here because a creator brought about our existence for a purpose 11 16 17 Forrest P524 Phillip Johnson states that the Darwinian theory of evolution contradicts not just the Book of Genesis but every word in the Bible from beginning to end It contradicts the idea that we are here because a creator brought about our existence for a purpose 11 16 17 Forrest P
Match 29 (1): Reference (001797 .. 001846, of 36359): Subject (005781 .. 005831, of 34107):
proponents Johnson William Dembski and Charles Thaxton one of the editors of Pandas situate intelligent design in the Book of John in the New Testament of the Bible which begins In the Beginning was the Word and the Word was God 11 18 20 54 55 Forrest P524 P355 P357 proponents Johnson William Dembski and Charles Thaxton one of the editors of Pandas situate ID in the Book of John in the New Testament of the Bible which begins In the Beginning was the Word and the Word was God 11 18 20 54 55 Forrest P 524 P 355 P
Match 30 (1): Reference (001813 .. 001851, of 36359): Subject (005796 .. 005836, of 34107):
in the Book of John in the New Testament of the Bible which begins In the Beginning was the Word and the Word was God 11 18 20 54 55 Forrest P524 P355 P357 Professor Dembski has written that in the Book of John in the New Testament of the Bible which begins In the Beginning was the Word and the Word was God 11 18 20 54 55 Forrest P 524 P 355 P 357 Dembski has written that
Match 31 (1): Reference (001876 .. 001913, of 36359): Subject (005833 .. 005872, of 34107):
Dembski has written that ID is a ground clearing operation to allow Christianity to receive serious consideration and Christ is never an addendum to a scientific theory but always a completion 11 50 53 Forrest P386 P390 o Dembski has written that ID is a ground clearing operation to allow Christianity to receive serious consideration and Christ is never an addendum to a scientific theory but always a completion 11 50 53 Forrest P 386 P 390 Moreover
Match 32 (1): Reference (001980 .. 001989, of 36359): Subject (005913 .. 005925, of 34107):
Professor Behe claims that the plausibility of the argument for Professor Behe remarkably and unmistakably claims that the plausibility of the argument for
Match 33 (1): Reference (001992 .. 002007, of 36359): Subject (005927 .. 005943, of 34107):
depends on the extent to which one believes in the existence of God P718 at 705 depends upon the extent to which one believes in the existence of God P 718 at 705
Match 34 (1): Reference (001992 .. 002026, of 36359): Subject (005927 .. 005964, of 34107):
depends on the extent to which one believes in the existence of God P718 at 705 There is no evidence in the record that any other scientific proposition s validity rests on belief in God depends upon the extent to which one believes in the existence of God P 718 at 705 emphasis added As no evidence in the record indicates that any other scientific proposition s validity rests on belief in God
Match 35 (1): Reference (002075 .. 002093, of 36359): Subject (006021 .. 006041, of 34107):
the Wedge Document which was developed by the Discovery Institute s Center for Renewal of Science and Culture CRSC the Wedge Document The Wedge Document developed by the Discovery Institute s Center for Renewal of Science and Culture hereinafter CRSC
Match 36 (1): Reference (002099 .. 002108, of 36359): Subject (006041 .. 006052, of 34107):
CRSC represents from an institutional standpoint the goals and objectives CRSC represents from an institutional standpoint the IDM s goals and objectives
Match 37 (1): Reference (002114 .. 002128, of 36359): Subject (006053 .. 006072, of 34107):
much as the Institute for Creation Research did for the earlier creationists discussed in McLean much as writings from the Institute for Creation Research did for the earlier creation science movement as discussed in McLean
Match 38 (1): Reference (002171 .. 002183, of 36359): Subject (006083 .. 006095, of 34107):
The Wedge Document states in its Five Year Strategic Plan Summary that the The Wedge Document states in its Five Year Strategic Plan Summary that the
Match 39 (1): Reference (002187 .. 002203, of 36359): Subject (006097 .. 006114, of 34107):
s goal is to replace science as currently practiced with theistic and Christian science P140 at 6 s goal is to replace science as currently practiced with theistic and Christian science P 140 at 6
Match 40 (1): Reference (002253 .. 002284, of 36359): Subject (006126 .. 006159, of 34107):
are to defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral cultural and political legacies and to replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God P140 are to defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral cultural and political legacies and to replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God Id at 4
Match 41 (1): Reference (002290 .. 002304, of 36359): Subject (006183 .. 006189, of 34107):
scientific goals but rather cultural and religious goals Similar language is found throughout the document s goals and language throughout the document
Match 42 (1): Reference (002338 .. 002374, of 36359): Subject (006242 .. 006280, of 34107):
is religious because it involves a supernatural designer The Edwards and McLean courts expressly found that this characteristic removed creationism from the realm of science and made it a religious proposition Edwards v Aguillard 482 U S s religious nature is evident because it involves a supernatural designer The courts in Edwards and McLean expressly found that this characteristic removed creationism from the realm of science and made it a religious proposition Edwards 482 U S
Match 43 (1): Reference (002412 .. 002436, of 36359): Subject (006434 .. 006458, of 34107):
concluded that science must be redefined to include the supernatural if religious challenges to evolution are to get a hearing 11 8 15 Forrest P429 concluded that science must be redefined to include the supernatural if religious challenges to evolution are to get a hearing 11 8 15 Forrest P
Match 44 (1): Reference (002488 .. 002504, of 36359): Subject (006462 .. 006478, of 34107):
agrees that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if agrees that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if
Match 45 (1): Reference (002534 .. 002557, of 36359): Subject (016372 .. 016396, of 34107):
Indeed entire fields of inquiry including especially the human sciences will need to be rethought from the ground up in terms of intelligent design Indeed entire fields of inquiry including especially in the human sciences will need to be rethought from the ground up in terms of intelligent design
Match 46 (1): Reference (002575 .. 002607, of 36359): Subject (006329 .. 006364, of 34107):
he means not designed by the laws of nature and that it is implausible that the designer is a natural entity P647 at 193 P718 at 696 700 Professor Minnich testified that for he means not designed by the laws of nature and that it is implausible that the designer is a natural entity P 647 at 193 P 718 at 696 700 Second Professor Minnich testified that for
Match 47 (1): Reference (002610 .. 002625, of 36359): Subject (006366 .. 006381, of 34107):
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened so that supernatural to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened so that supernatural
Match 48 (1): Reference (002641 .. 002656, of 36359): Subject (006399 .. 006419, of 34107):
s project to change the ground rules of science to include the supernatural 28 20 24 s project to change the ground rules of science to include the supernatural Trial Tr vol 28 Fuller Test 20 24
Match 49 (1): Reference (002666 .. 002675, of 36359): Subject (006524 .. 006533, of 34107):
that there are two kinds of causes natural and intelligent that there are two kinds of causes natural and intelligent
Match 50 (1): Reference (002678 .. 002688, of 36359): Subject (006536 .. 006547, of 34107):
that intelligent causes are beyond nature P11 at 6 Professor Haught that intelligent causes are beyond nature P 11 at 6 Professor Haught
Match 51 (1): Reference (002689 .. 002720, of 36359): Subject (006552 .. 006589, of 34107):
the only theologian to testify in this case explained that in Western intellectual tradition non natural causes occupy a space reserved for ultimate religious explanations 9 13 14 Robert Pennock the scientific the only theologian to testify in this case explained that in Western intellectual tradition non natural causes occupy a space reserved for ultimate religious explanations 9 13 14 Haught Robert Pennock Plaintiffs expert in the philosophy of science
Match 52 (1): Reference (002727 .. 002748, of 36359): Subject (006596 .. 006617, of 34107):
that because its basic proposition is that the features of the natural world are produced by a transcendent immaterial non natural being that because its basic proposition is that the features of the natural world are produced by a transcendent immaterial non natural being
Match 53 (1): Reference (002751 .. 002770, of 36359): Subject (006619 .. 006638, of 34107):
is a religious proposition regardless of whether that religious proposition is given a recognized religious label 5 55 56 Pennock is a religious proposition regardless of whether that religious proposition is given a recognized religious label 5 55 56 Pennock
Match 54 (1): Reference (002882 .. 002902, of 36359): Subject (006796 .. 006819, of 34107):
FTE s Articles of Incorporation and filings with the Internal Revenue Service describe it as a religious Christian organization P461 P28 FTE as noted whose articles of incorporation and filings with the Internal Revenue Service describe it as a religious Christian organization P 461 P
Match 55 (1): Reference (003061 .. 003072, of 36359): Subject (006832 .. 006843, of 34107):
Pandas was written by Dean Kenyon and Percival Davis both acknowledged creationists Pandas was written by Dean Kenyon and Percival Davis both acknowledged creationists
Match 56 (1): Reference (003226 .. 003253, of 36359): Subject (007036 .. 007063, of 34107):
various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc various forms of life that began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc
Match 57 (1): Reference (003254 .. 003264, of 36359): Subject (007103 .. 007117, of 34107):
P11 at 99 100 This was described by many witnesses for 11 at 99 100 P 856 2 This definition was described by many witnesses for
Match 58 (1): Reference (003270 .. 003294, of 36359): Subject (007124 .. 007147, of 34107):
Minnich and Steven Fuller as special creation of kinds of animals an inherently religious and creationist concept 28 85 86 Fuller Minnich Dep at 34 Minnich and Fuller as special creation of kinds of animals an inherently religious and creationist concept 28 85 86 Fuller Minnich Dep at 34
Match 59 (1): Reference (003314 .. 003331, of 36359): Subject (007176 .. 007193, of 34107):
Professor Behe s assertion that this passage was merely a description of appearances in the fossil record is Professor Behe s assertion that this passage was merely a description of appearances in the fossil record is
Match 60 (1): Reference (003358 .. 003383, of 36359): Subject (007203 .. 007229, of 34107):
rather a conclusion about how life began based on an interpretation of the fossil record This is reinforced by the content of the drafts of Pandas the passage is a conclusion about how life began based upon an interpretation of the fossil record which is reinforced by the content of drafts of Pandas
Match 61 (1): Reference (003418 .. 003437, of 36359): Subject (006912 .. 006928, of 34107):
points emerge from this comparison 1 the definition for creation science in early drafts is identical to the definition of points emerge 1 the definition for creation science in early drafts is identical to the definition of
Match 62 (1): Reference (003440 .. 003449, of 36359): Subject (006930 .. 006940, of 34107):
2 cognates of the word creation creationism and creationist are 2 cognates of the word creation creationism and creationist which appeared
Match 63 (1): Reference (003455 .. 003482, of 36359): Subject (006953 .. 006981, of 34107):
and 3 the changes occurred shortly after the Supreme Court held in Edwards that creation science is religious and cannot be taught in public school science classes o and 3 the changes occurred shortly after the Supreme Court held that creation science is religious and cannot be taught in public school science classes in Edwards This word
Match 64 (1): Reference (003531 .. 003567, of 36359): Subject (007034 .. 007068, of 34107):
defined in these drafts as various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc the same way intelligent defined as various forms of life that began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc the very same way in
Match 65 (1): Reference (003569 .. 003588, of 36359): Subject (007071 .. 007099, of 34107):
is defined in the published versions P560 at 210 P1 at 2 13 P562 at 2 14 2015 P652 at is defined in the subsequent published versions P 560 at 210 P 1 at 2 13 P 562 at 2 14 P 652 at 2 15 P 6 at
Match 66 (1): Reference (003663 .. 003684, of 36359): Subject (007230 .. 007259, of 34107):
The evidence demonstrates that the change from creation to intelligent design occurred sometime in 1987 after the Supreme Court s Edwards decision The weight of the evidence clearly demonstrates as noted that the systemic change from creation to intelligent design occurred sometime in 1987 after the Supreme Court s important Edwards decision
Match 67 (1): Reference (003934 .. 003951, of 36359): Subject (007379 .. 007399, of 34107):
Dr Forrest testified and sponsored exhibits showing six arguments common to creationists 10 140 48 Forrest P856 1 Dr Forrest testified and sponsored exhibits showing six arguments common to creationists 10 140 48 Forrest P 856 5 856 10
Match 68 (1): Reference (003955 .. 003976, of 36359): Subject (007495 .. 007516, of 34107):
creationists made the same argument that the complexity of the bacterial flagellum supported creationism as Professors Behe and Minnich now make for creationists made the same argument that the complexity of the bacterial flagellum supported creationism as Professors Behe and Minnich now make for
Match 69 (1): Reference (003989 .. 004014, of 36359): Subject (007528 .. 007553, of 34107):
openly welcomes adherents to creationism into its Big Tent urging them to postpone biblical disputes like the age of the earth 11 3 15 Forrest P429 openly welcomes adherents to creationism into its Big Tent urging them to postpone biblical disputes like the age of the earth 11 3 15 Forrest P
Match 70 (1): Reference (004073 .. 004087, of 36359): Subject (007616 .. 007627, of 34107):
is not creationism but their testimony on this subject was primarily by way of assertion is not creationism their testimony was primarily by way of bare assertion
Match 71 (1): Reference (004092 .. 004110, of 36359): Subject (007632 .. 007650, of 34107):
directly rebut the creationist history of Pandas or other evidence presented by plaintiffs showing the commonality between creationism and directly rebut the creationist history of Pandas or other evidence presented by Plaintiffs showing the commonality between creationism and
Match 72 (1): Reference (004125 .. 004149, of 36359): Subject (007662 .. 007686, of 34107):
was the assertion that the term creationism applies only to arguments based on the Book of Genesis a young earth and a catastrophic Noaich flood was their assertion that the term creationism applies only to arguments based on the Book of Genesis a young earth and a catastrophic Noaich flood
Match 73 (1): Reference (004156 .. 004174, of 36359): Subject (007691 .. 007709, of 34107):
that this is only one form of creationism including the chart that was distributed to the Board Curriculum Committee that this is only one form of creationism including the chart that was distributed to the Board Curriculum Committee
Match 74 (1): Reference (004175 .. 004187, of 36359): Subject (007716 .. 007727, of 34107):
P149 at 2 See also 10 129 32 Forrest P555 at 22 24 149 at 2 10 129 32 Forrest P 555 at 22 24
Match 75 (1): Reference (004533 .. 004552, of 36359): Subject (015399 .. 015422, of 34107):
argument irreducible complexity employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980 s and argument of irreducible complexity central to ID employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980 s and
Match 76 (1): Reference (004553 .. 004567, of 36359): Subject (015417 .. 015436, of 34107):
c intelligent design s negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community science in the 1980 s and 3 ID s negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community
Match 77 (1): Reference (004571 .. 004591, of 36359): Subject (015453 .. 015478, of 34107):
has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community generate peer reviewed publications or been the subject of testing and research has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community it has not generated peer reviewed publications nor has it been the subject of testing and research
Match 78 (1): Reference (004658 .. 004719, of 36359): Subject (015483 .. 015549, of 34107):
Since the scientific revolution of the 16 th and 17 th centuries science has been limited to the search for natural causes to explain natural phenomena 9 19 22 Haught 5 25 29 Pennock 1 62 Miller This revolution entailed the rejection of the appeal to authority and by extension revelation in favor of empirical evidence 5 28 Pennock That s probably since the scientific revolution of the 16 th and 17 th centuries science has been limited to the search for natural causes to explain natural phenomena 9 19 22 Haught 5 25 29 Pennock 1 62 Miller This revolution entailed the rejection of the appeal to authority and by extension revelation in favor of empirical evidence 5 28 Pennock Since that time period science has been a
Match 79 (1): Reference (004745 .. 004781, of 36359): Subject (015542 .. 015581, of 34107):
since that time science has been a discipline in which testability rather than any ecclesiastical authority or philosophical coherence has been the measure of a scientific idea s worth 9 21 22 Haught 1 63 Miller o Since that time period science has been a discipline in which testability rather than any ecclesiastical authority or philosophical coherence has been the measure of a scientific idea s worth 9 21 22 Haught 1 63 Miller In deliberately omitting
Match 80 (1): Reference (004788 .. 004800, of 36359): Subject (015582 .. 015594, of 34107):
theological or ultimate explanations for the existence or characteristics of the natural world theological or ultimate explanations for the existence or characteristics of the natural world
Match 81 (1): Reference (004788 .. 004820, of 36359): Subject (015582 .. 015616, of 34107):
theological or ultimate explanations for the existence or characteristics of the natural world 9 21 Haught Science does not consider issues of meaning and purpose in the world 1 64 87 Miller o theological or ultimate explanations for the existence or characteristics of the natural world science does not consider issues of meaning and purpose in the world 9 21 Haught 1 64 87 Miller While supernatural explanations
Match 82 (1): Reference (004822 .. 004844, of 36359): Subject (015615 .. 015638, of 34107):
Supernatural explanations are important and may have merit but they are not part of science 3 103 Miller 9 19 20 Haught o supernatural explanations may be important and have merit they are not part of science 3 103 Miller 9 19 20 Haught This self imposed
Match 83 (1): Reference (004822 .. 004870, of 36359): Subject (015615 .. 015660, of 34107):
Supernatural explanations are important and may have merit but they are not part of science 3 103 Miller 9 19 20 Haught o 38 This self imposed convention of science which limits inquiry to testable natural explanations about the natural world is referred to by philosophers as methodological naturalism supernatural explanations may be important and have merit they are not part of science 3 103 Miller 9 19 20 Haught This self imposed convention of science which limits inquiry to testable natural explanations about the natural world is referred to by philosophers as methodological naturalism
Match 84 (1): Reference (004897 .. 004917, of 36359): Subject (015669 .. 015695, of 34107):
5 8 23 Pennock This ground rule of science requires scientists to seek explanations in the world around us based upon 5 23 29 30 Pennock Methodological naturalism is a ground rule of science today which requires scientists to seek explanations in the world around us based upon
Match 85 (1): Reference (004919 .. 004936, of 36359): Subject (015697 .. 015715, of 34107):
we can observe test replicate and verify 1 59 64 2 41 43 Miller 5 23 30 Pennock we can observe test replicate and verify 1 59 64 2 41 43 Miller 5 8 23 30 Pennock
Match 86 (1): Reference (004954 .. 004964, of 36359): Subject (015718 .. 015729, of 34107):
National Academy of Sciences NAS was recognized by experts for both National Academy of Sciences hereinafter NAS was recognized by experts for both
Match 87 (1): Reference (004966 .. 004975, of 36359): Subject (015731 .. 015739, of 34107):
as being the most prestigious scientific association in this country as the most prestigious scientific association in this country
Match 88 (1): Reference (004987 .. 004996, of 36359): Subject (015751 .. 015762, of 34107):
160 61 Miller 14 72 Alters 37 31 Minnich Accordingly 160 61 Miller 14 72 Alters 37 31 Minnich NAS is in
Match 89 (1): Reference (005008 .. 005088, of 36359): Subject (015760 .. 015842, of 34107):
NAS agrees that science is limited to empirical observable and ultimately testable data Science is a particular way of knowing about the world In science explanations are restricted to those that can be inferred from the confirmable data the results obtained through observations and experiments that can be substantiated by other scientists Anything that can be observed or measured is amenable to scientific investigation Explanations that cannot be based on empirical evidence are not a part of science P649 at 27 NAS is in agreement that science is limited to empirical observable and ultimately testable data Science is a particular way of knowing about the world In science explanations are restricted to those that can be inferred from the confirmable data the results obtained through observations and experiments that can be substantiated by other scientists Anything that can be observed or measured is amenable to scientific investigation Explanations that cannot be based upon empirical evidence are not part of science P 649 at 27
Match 90 (1): Reference (005122 .. 005131, of 36359): Subject (015843 .. 015852, of 34107):
This rigorous attachment to natural explanations is an essential attribute This rigorous attachment to natural explanations is an essential attribute
Match 91 (1): Reference (005158 .. 005168, of 36359): Subject (015500 .. 015513, of 34107):
the systematic search for natural explanations for natural phenomena 1 59 the search for natural causes to explain natural phenomena 9 19 22 Haught 5
Match 92 (1): Reference (005276 .. 005302, of 36359): Subject (015878 .. 015904, of 34107):
From a practical perspective attributing unsolved problems about nature to causes and forces that lie outside the natural world is a science stopper 3 14 15 Miller from a practical perspective attributing unsolved problems about nature to causes and forces that lie outside the natural world is a science stopper 3 14 15 Miller
Match 93 (1): Reference (005276 .. 005333, of 36359): Subject (015878 .. 015943, of 34107):
From a practical perspective attributing unsolved problems about nature to causes and forces that lie outside the natural world is a science stopper 3 14 15 Miller Once you attribute a cause to an untestable supernatural force a proposition that cannot be disproven there is no reason to continue seeking natural explanations we have our answer Id o from a practical perspective attributing unsolved problems about nature to causes and forces that lie outside the natural world is a science stopper 3 14 15 Miller As Dr Miller explained once you attribute a cause to an untestable supernatural force a proposition that cannot be disproven there is no reason to continue seeking natural explanations as we have our answer Id ID is predicated on
Match 94 (1): Reference (005354 .. 005376, of 36359): Subject (015967 .. 015990, of 34107):
takes a natural phenomenon and instead of accepting or seeking a natural explanation argues that the explanation is supernatural 5 107 Pennock o takes a natural phenomenon and instead of accepting or seeking a natural explanation argues that the explanation is supernatural 5 107 Pennock Further support
Match 95 (1): Reference (005407 .. 005473, of 36359): Subject (016024 .. 016091, of 34107):
Darwinists object to the view of intelligent design because it does not give a natural cause explanation of how the various forms of life started in the first place Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive feature already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc P11 at 99 100 Emphasis added Darwinists object to the view of intelligent design because it does not give a natural cause explanation of how the various forms of life started in the first place Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc P 11 at 99 100 emphasis added
Match 96 (1): Reference (005477 .. 005497, of 36359): Subject (016098 .. 016118, of 34107):
animals did not evolve naturally through evolutionary means but rather were created abruptly by a non natural or supernatural designer o animals did not evolve naturally through evolutionary means but were created abruptly by a non natural or supernatural designer Defendants own
Match 97 (1): Reference (005477 .. 005510, of 36359): Subject (016098 .. 016127, of 34107):
animals did not evolve naturally through evolutionary means but rather were created abruptly by a non natural or supernatural designer o 45 Even defendants own expert witnesses acknowledged this point 21 96 100 Behe animals did not evolve naturally through evolutionary means but were created abruptly by a non natural or supernatural designer Defendants own expert witnesses acknowledged this point 21 96 100 Behe
Match 98 (1): Reference (005519 .. 005558, of 36359): Subject (016130 .. 016172, of 34107):
at 696 700 implausible that the designer is a natural entity 28 21 22 Fuller ID s rejection of naturalism and commitment to supernaturalism 24 38 95 96 Minnich ID does not exclude possibility of supernatural designer including deities o at 696 700 implausible that the designer is a natural entity 28 21 22 Fuller ID s rejection of naturalism and commitment to supernaturalism 38 95 96 Minnich ID does not exclude the possibility of a supernatural designer including deities It is notable
Match 99 (1): Reference (005565 .. 005579, of 36359): Subject (010216 .. 010231, of 34107):
that of the intelligent design movement is to change the ground rules of science to presentation of the disclaimer including school administrators making a special appearance in the science classrooms to
Match 100 (1): Reference (005571 .. 005586, of 36359): Subject (016185 .. 016200, of 34107):
is to change the ground rules of science to allow supernatural causation of the natural world is to change the ground rules of science to allow supernatural causation of the natural world
Match 101 (1): Reference (005606 .. 005616, of 36359): Subject (016252 .. 016262, of 34107):
Professor Behe admitted that his broadened definition of science which encompasses Professor Behe admitted that his broadened definition of science which encompasses
Match 102 (1): Reference (005619 .. 005631, of 36359): Subject (016264 .. 016282, of 34107):
would also embrace astrology 21 37 42 Behe Professor Minnich acknowledged that for would also embrace astrology 28 26 Fuller 21 37 42 Behe Moreover defense expert Professor Minnich acknowledged that for
Match 103 (1): Reference (005634 .. 005646, of 36359): Subject (006366 .. 006378, of 34107):
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened
Match 104 (1): Reference (005634 .. 005651, of 36359): Subject (016284 .. 016301, of 34107):
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened to allow consideration of supernatural to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened to allow consideration of supernatural
Match 105 (1): Reference (005663 .. 005680, of 36359): Subject (016342 .. 016359, of 34107):
leader proclaims that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if leader proclaims that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if
Match 106 (1): Reference (005710 .. 005733, of 36359): Subject (016372 .. 016396, of 34107):
Indeed entire fields of inquiry including especially the human sciences will need to be rethought from the ground up in terms of intelligent design Indeed entire fields of inquiry including especially in the human sciences will need to be rethought from the ground up in terms of intelligent design
Match 107 (1): Reference (005772 .. 005793, of 36359): Subject (006139 .. 006160, of 34107):
and to replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God P140 at 6 The and to replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God Id at 4 The
Match 108 (1): Reference (005801 .. 005810, of 36359): Subject (016505 .. 016514, of 34107):
Every major scientific association that has taken a position on every major scientific association that has taken a position on
Match 109 (1): Reference (005825 .. 005836, of 36359): Subject (016534 .. 016547, of 34107):
1 98 99 Miller 14 75 78 Alters 37 25 Minnich o 1 98 99 Miller 14 75 78 Alters 37 25 Minnich Initially we note
Match 110 (1): Reference (005844 .. 005955, of 36359): Subject (016560 .. 016672, of 34107):
as follows Creationism intelligent design and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority revelation or religious belief Documentation offered in support of these claims is typically limited to the special publications of their advocates These publications do not offer hypotheses subject to change in light of new data new interpretations or demonstration of error This contrasts with science where any hypothesis or theory always remains subject to the possibility of rejection or modification in the light of new knowledge P192 at 25 National as follows Creationism intelligent design and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority revelation or religious belief Documentation offered in support of these claims is typically limited to the special publications of their advocates These publications do not offer hypotheses subject to change in light of new data new interpretations or demonstration of error This contrasts with science where any hypothesis or theory always remains subject to the possibility of rejection or modification in the light of new knowledge P 192 at 25 Additionally
Match 111 (1): Reference (005999 .. 006035, of 36359): Subject (016698 .. 016734, of 34107):
namely that it has not proposed a scientific means of testing its claims and that the lack of scientific warrant for so called intelligent design theory makes it improper to include as part of science education P198 namely that it has not proposed a scientific means of testing its claims and that the lack of scientific warrant for so called intelligent design theory makes it improper to include as part of science education P
Match 112 (1): Reference (006054 .. 006064, of 36359): Subject (016749 .. 016758, of 34107):
identified a single major scientific association society or organization that endorsed identified one major scientific association society or organization that endorsed
Match 113 (1): Reference (006078 .. 006089, of 36359): Subject (016770 .. 016781, of 34107):
is not a theory as that term is defined by the NAS is not a theory as that term is defined by the NAS
Match 114 (1): Reference (006176 .. 006217, of 36359): Subject (016834 .. 016873, of 34107):
meet the essential ground rules that limit science to testable natural explanations 3 101 03 Miller 14 62 Alters o 56 Science cannot be defined differently for Dover students than it is defined in the scientific community as an affirmative action program meet the essential ground rules that limit science to testable natural explanations 3 101 03 Miller 14 62 Alters Science cannot be defined differently for Dover students than it is defined in the scientific community as an affirmative action program
Match 115 (1): Reference (006218 .. 006232, of 36359): Subject (016879 .. 016893, of 34107):
for a view that has been unable to gain a foothold within the scientific establishment for a view that has been unable to gain a foothold within the scientific establishment
Match 116 (1): Reference (006235 .. 006244, of 36359): Subject (016896 .. 016906, of 34107):
s failure to meet the ground rules of science is s fa ilure to meet the ground rules of science is
Match 117 (1): Reference (006277 .. 006291, of 36359): Subject (016944 .. 016960, of 34107):
is premised on a false dichotomy namely that to the extent evolutionary theory is discredited is at bottom premised upon a false dichotomy namely that to the extent evolutionary theory is discredited
Match 118 (1): Reference (006312 .. 006323, of 36359): Subject (016987 .. 016998, of 34107):
was employed by creationists in the 1980 s to support creation science was employed by creationists in the 1980 s to support creation science
Match 119 (1): Reference (006334 .. 006345, of 36359): Subject (017071 .. 017083, of 34107):
today than it was to justify creation science two decades ago o today than it was to justify creation science two decades ago ID proponents
Match 120 (1): Reference (006349 .. 006358, of 36359): Subject (017083 .. 017092, of 34107):
proponents primarily argue for design through negative argument against evolution proponents primarily argue for design through negative arguments against evolution
Match 121 (1): Reference (006360 .. 006394, of 36359): Subject (017096 .. 017130, of 34107):
Professor Behe s argument that irreducibly complex systems cannot be produced through Darwinian or any natural mechanisms 5 38 41 Pennock 1 39 2 15 2 35 37 3 96 Miller 16 72 73 Padian Professor Behe s argument that irreducibly complex systems cannot be produced through Darwinian or any natural mechanisms 5 38 41 Pennock 1 39 2 15 2 35 37 3 96 Miller 16 72 73 Padian
Match 122 (1): Reference (006662 .. 006689, of 36359): Subject (017150 .. 017178, of 34107):
Just because scientists cannot explain today how biological systems evolved does not mean they cannot and will not be able to explain them tomorrow 2 36 37 Miller just because scientists cannot explain today how biological systems evolved does not mean that they cannot and will not be able to explain them tomorrow 2 36 37 Miller
Match 123 (1): Reference (006695 .. 006704, of 36359): Subject (017184 .. 017193, of 34107):
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence 17 45 absence of evidence is not evidence of absence 17 45
Match 124 (1): Reference (006714 .. 006743, of 36359): Subject (017207 .. 017238, of 34107):
examples where Pandas asserted that no natural explanations exist and in some cases that none could exist and yet natural explanations have been identified in the intervening years e g examples where Pandas asserted that no natural explanations exist and in some cases that none could exist and yet natural explanations have been identified in the intervening years It also bears mentioning
Match 125 (1): Reference (006773 .. 006789, of 36359): Subject (017244 .. 017260, of 34107):
Just because scientists cannot explain every evolutionary detail does not undermine its validity as a scientific theory just because scientists cannot explain every evolutionary detail does not undermine its validity as a scientific theory
Match 126 (1): Reference (006919 .. 006932, of 36359): Subject (018148 .. 018156, of 34107):
fact Professor Fuller testified that even if the negative argument of irreducible complexity disproved fact that the negative argument of irreducible complexity is
Match 127 (1): Reference (006975 .. 007015, of 36359): Subject (017281 .. 017325, of 34107):
s alleged scientific centerpiece is simply a negative argument against evolution not proof of design 2 15 Miller a point conceded by Professor Minnich 38 82 irreducible complexity is not a test of intelligent design it s a test of evolution s alleged scientific centerpiece Irreducible complexity is a negative argument against evolution not proof of design a point conceded by defense expert Professor Minnich 2 15 Miller 38 82 Minnich irreducible complexity is not a test of intelligent design it s a test of evoluti
Match 128 (1): Reference (007043 .. 007181, of 36359): Subject (017349 .. 017492, of 34107):
Irreducible complexity was defined by Professor Behe in Darwin s Black Box and modified in his 2001 article Reply to My Critics as follows By irreducibly complex I mean a single system which is composed of several well matched interacting parts that contribute to the basic function wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning An irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly by slight successive modifications of a precursor system because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional Since natural selection can only choose systems that are already working then if a biological system cannot be produced gradually it would have to arise as an integrated unit in one fell swoop for natural selection to have anything to act on P647 irreducible complexity as defined by Professor Behe in his book Darwin s Black Box and subsequently modified in his 2001 article entitled Reply to My Critics appears as follows By irreducibly complex I mean a single system which is composed of several well matched interacting parts that contribute to the basic function wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning An irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly by slight successive modifications of a precursor system because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional Since natural selection can only choose systems that are already working then if a biological system cannot be produced gradually it would have to arise as an integrated unit in one fell swoop for natural selection to have anything to act on P
Match 129 (1): Reference (007193 .. 007242, of 36359): Subject (017497 .. 017550, of 34107):
P718 at 694 o 66 Professor Behe admitted in Reply to My Critics that there was a defect in his view of irreducible complexity because while it purports to be a challenge to natural selection it does not actually address the task facing natural selection P718 at 695 Specifically Behe 718 at 694 Professor Behe admitted in Reply to My Critics that there was a defect in his view of irreducible complexity because while it purports to be a challenge to natural selection it does not actually address the task facing natural selection P 718 at 695 Professor Behe specifically explained that t he
Match 130 (1): Reference (007242 .. 007296, of 36359): Subject (017545 .. 017600, of 34107):
Behe explained that t he current definition puts the focus on removing a part from an already functioning system but t he difficult task facing Darwinian evolution however would not be to remove parts from sophisticated pre existing systems it would be to bring together components to make a new system in the first place Behe specifically explained that t he current definition puts the focus on removing a part from an already functioning system but t he difficult task facing Darwinian evolution however would not be to remove parts from sophisticated pre existing systems it would be to bring together components to make a new system in the first place
Match 131 (1): Reference (007300 .. 007315, of 36359): Subject (017602 .. 017617, of 34107):
In that article Professor Behe wrote that he hoped to repair this defect in future work In that article Professor Behe wrote that he hoped to repair this defect in future work
Match 132 (1): Reference (007326 .. 007344, of 36359): Subject (017642 .. 017660, of 34107):
This admitted failure to properly address the very phenomenon that irreducible complexity purports to place at issue natural selection s admitted failure to properly address the very phenomenon that irreducible complexity purports to place at issue natural selection
Match 133 (1): Reference (007361 .. 007380, of 36359): Subject (017666 .. 017687, of 34107):
that Professor Behe s concept of irreducible complexity depends on ignoring ways in which evolution is known to occur Behe that Professor Behe s concept of irreducible complexity depends on ignoring ways in which evolution is known to occur Although Professor Behe
Match 134 (1): Reference (007382 .. 007407, of 36359): Subject (017689 .. 017714, of 34107):
adamant that in his definition of irreducible complexity when he says a precursor missing a part is by definition nonfunctional what he means is that it adamant in his definition of irreducible complexity when he says a precursor missing a part is by definition nonfunctional what he obviously means is that it
Match 135 (1): Reference (007409 .. 007422, of 36359): Subject (017716 .. 017730, of 34107):
t function in the way the system functions when all the parts are present not function in the same way the system functions when all the parts are present
Match 136 (1): Reference (007424 .. 007433, of 36359): Subject (017732 .. 017743, of 34107):
example in the case of the bacterial flagellum as a example in the case of the bacterial flagellum removal of a part
Match 137 (1): Reference (007453 .. 007462, of 36359): Subject (017732 .. 017743, of 34107):
example in the case of the bacterial flagellum as a example in the case of the bacterial flagellum removal of a part
Match 138 (1): Reference (007471 .. 007489, of 36359): Subject (017794 .. 017812, of 34107):
qualification on what is meant by irreducible complexity renders it meaningless as a criticism of evolution 3 40 Miller qualification on what is meant by irreducible complexity renders it meaningless as a criticism of evolution 3 40 Miller
Match 139 (1): Reference (007605 .. 007692, of 36359): Subject (017813 .. 017900, of 34107):
In fact the theory of evolution has a well recognized well documented explanation for how systems with multiple parts could have evolved through natural means namely exaptation Exaptation means that some precursor of the subject system had a different selectable function before experiencing the change or addition that resulted in the subject system with its present function 16 146 48 Padian For instance Dr Padian identified the evolution of the mammalian middle ear bones from what had been jawbones as an example of this process 17 6 17 In fact the theory of evolution proffers exaptation as a well recognized well documented explanation for how systems with multiple parts could have evolved through natural means Exaptation means that some precursor of the subject system had a different selectable function before experiencing the change or addition that resulted in the subject system with its present function 16 146 48 Padian For instance Dr Padian identified the evolution of the mammalian middle ear bones from what had been jawbones as an example of this process 17 6 17
Match 140 (1): Reference (007785 .. 007805, of 36359): Subject (017902 .. 017923, of 34107):
By defining irreducible complexity in the way he has Professor Behe attempts to exclude the phenomenon of exaptation by definitional fiat By defining irreducible complexity in the way that he has Professor Behe attempts to exclude the phenomenon of exaptation by definitional fiat
Match 141 (1): Reference (007831 .. 007840, of 36359): Subject (017938 .. 017948, of 34107):
has rejected Professor Behe s claim for irreducible complexity using has rejected Professor Behe s claim for irreducible complexity by using
Match 142 (1): Reference (007843 .. 007915, of 36359): Subject (017952 .. 018024, of 34107):
reasoning S tructures and processes that are claimed to be irreducibly complex typically are not on closer inspection For example it is incorrect to assume that a complex structure or biochemical process can function only if all its components are present and functioning as we see them today Complex biochemical systems can be built up from simpler systems through natural selection Thus the history of a protein can be traced through simpler organisms reasoning S tructures and processes that are claimed to be irreducibly complex typically are not on closer inspection For example it is incorrect to assume that a complex structure or biochemical process can function only if all its components are present and functioning as we see them today Complex biochemical systems can be built up from simpler systems through natural selection Thus the history of a protein can be traced through simpler organisms
Match 143 (1): Reference (007935 .. 008012, of 36359): Subject (018025 .. 018105, of 34107):
The evolution of complex molecular systems can occur in several ways Natural selection can bring together parts of a system for one function at one time and then at a later time recombine those parts with other systems of components to produce a system that has a different function Genes can be duplicated altered and then amplified through natural selection The complex biochemical cascade resulting in blood clotting has been explained in this fashion P192 at 22 o The evolution of complex molecular systems can occur in several ways Natural selection can bring together parts of a system for one function at one time and then at a later time recombine those parts with other systems of components to produce a system that has a different function Genes can be duplicated altered and then amplified through natural selection The complex biochemical cascade resulting in blood clotting has been explained in this fashion P 192 at 22 As irreducible complexity
Match 144 (1): Reference (008014 .. 008036, of 36359): Subject (018172 .. 018200, of 34107):
Professor Behe has applied irreducible complexity only to a few select systems the bacterial flagellum the blood clotting cascade and the immune system Professor Behe has applied the concept of irreducible complexity to only a few select systems 1 the bacterial flagellum 2 the blood clotting cascade and 3 the immune system
Match 145 (1): Reference (008040 .. 008049, of 36359): Subject (020808 .. 020817, of 34107):
Professor Behe has admitted there are no peer reviewed articles Professor Behe admitted that There are no peer reviewed articles
Match 146 (1): Reference (008056 .. 008067, of 36359): Subject (018188 .. 018203, of 34107):
the bacterial flagellum the blood clotting cascade and the immune system or the bacterial flagellum 2 the blood clotting cascade and 3 the immune system Contrary to Professor
Match 147 (1): Reference (008090 .. 008115, of 36359): Subject (018114 .. 018144, of 34107):
is testable by showing that there are intermediate structures with selectable functions that could have evolved into the allegedly irreducibly complex systems 2 15 16 Miller is refutable and accordingly testable unlike ID by showing that there are intermediate structures with selectable functions that could have evolved into the allegedly irreducibly complex systems 2 15 16 Miller
Match 148 (1): Reference (008120 .. 008129, of 36359): Subject (018151 .. 018164, of 34107):
negative argument is testable does not make the argument for negative argument of irreducible complexity is testable does not make testable the argument for
Match 149 (1): Reference (008142 .. 008152, of 36359): Subject (018221 .. 018231, of 34107):
Dr Miller presented evidence based on peer reviewed studies that the Dr Miller presented evidence based upon peer reviewed studies that they
Match 150 (1): Reference (008173 .. 008208, of 36359): Subject (018245 .. 018281, of 34107):
Dr Miller pointed to peer reviewed studies that identified a possible pre cursor to the bacterial flagellum a subsystem that was fully functional namely the Type III Secretory System 2 8 20 P854 23 854 32 Dr Miller pointed to peer reviewed studies that identified a possible precursor to the bacterial flagellum a subsystem that was fully functional namely the Type III Secretory System 2 8 20 Miller P 854 23 854 32
Match 151 (1): Reference (008212 .. 008252, of 36359): Subject (018285 .. 018326, of 34107):
Professor Minnich admits that there is serious scientific research on the question of whether the bacterial flagellum evolved into the Type III Secretory System the Type III Secretory System into the bacterial flagellum or they both evolved from a common ancestor Professor Minnich admited that there is serious scientific research on the question of whether the bacterial flagellum evolved into the Type III Secretary System the Type III Secretory System into the bacterial flagellum or whether they both evolved from a common ancestor
Match 152 (1): Reference (008268 .. 008300, of 36359): Subject (018347 .. 018381, of 34107):
testified about this research we re looking at the function of these systems and how they could have been derived one from the other And it s a legitimate scientific inquiry 38 16 testified about his research as follows we re looking at the function of these systems and how they could have been derived one from the other And it s a legitimate scientific inquiry 38 16
Match 153 (1): Reference (008374 .. 008393, of 36359): Subject (018391 .. 018410, of 34107):
Dr Miller demonstrated that the alleged irreducible complexity of the blood clotting cascade has been disproven by peer reviewed studies Dr Miller demonstrated that the alleged irreducible complexity of the blood clotting cascade has been disproven by peer reviewed studies
Match 154 (1): Reference (008395 .. 008454, of 36359): Subject (018412 .. 018475, of 34107):
back to 1969 which showed that dolphins and whales blood clots despite missing a part of the cascade a study that was confirmed by molecular testing in 1998 1 122 29 P854 17 854 22 More recently scientists published studies showing that in puffer fish blood clots despite the cascade missing not only one but three parts 1 128 29 back to 1969 which show that dolphins and whales blood clots despite missing a part of the cascade a study that was confirmed by molecular testing in 1998 1 122 29 Miller P 854 17 854 22 Additionally and more recently scientists published studies showing that in puffer fish blood clots despite the cascade missing not only one but three parts 1 128 29
Match 155 (1): Reference (008457 .. 008476, of 36359): Subject (018478 .. 018498, of 34107):
scientists in peer reviewed publications have refuted Behe s prediction about the alleged irreducible complexity of the blood clotting cascade scientists in peer reviewed publications have refuted Professor Behe s predication about the alleged irreducible complexity of the blood clotting cascade
Match 156 (1): Reference (008505 .. 008520, of 36359): Subject (018515 .. 018533, of 34107):
designed to avoid peer reviewed scientific evidence that falsifies his argument not a scientifically warranted redefinition designed to avoid peer reviewed scientific evidence that falsifies his argument as it was not a scientifically warranted redefinition
Match 157 (1): Reference (008527 .. 008546, of 36359): Subject (018601 .. 018622, of 34107):
Dr Miller also presented peer reviewed studies refuting Professor Behe s claim that the immune system was irreducibly complex 2 Dr Miller presented peer reviewed studies refuting Professor Behe s claim that the immune system was irreducibly complex Between 1996 and 2002
Match 158 (1): Reference (008569 .. 008579, of 36359): Subject (018580 .. 018588, of 34107):
at the time but that in fact natural explanations were impossible at the time but that natural explanations were impossible
Match 159 (1): Reference (008641 .. 008672, of 36359): Subject (018619 .. 018650, of 34107):
between 1996 and 2005 various studies confirmed each element of the evolutionary hypothesis explaining the origin of the immune system 2 31 Miller o 77 On cross examination Professor Behe was questioned Between 1996 and 2002 various studies confirmed each element of the evolutionary hypothesis explaining the origin of the immune system 2 31 Miller In fact on cross examination Professor Behe was questioned
Match 160 (1): Reference (008674 .. 008690, of 36359): Subject (018652 .. 018668, of 34107):
his 1996 claim that science would never find an evolutionary explanation for the immune system He was his 1996 claim that science would never find an evolutionary explanation for the immune system He was
Match 161 (1): Reference (008692 .. 008713, of 36359): Subject (018670 .. 018689, of 34107):
with the fifty eight peer reviewed publications nine books and several immunology text book chapters about the evolution of the immune system with fifty eight peer reviewed publications nine books and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system
Match 162 (1): Reference (008724 .. 008741, of 36359): Subject (018691 .. 018711, of 34107):
he insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution it was not good enough 23 19 he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution and that it was not good enough 23 19
Match 163 (1): Reference (008751 .. 008764, of 36359): Subject (018722 .. 018739, of 34107):
argument depends on setting a burden of proof for the theory of evolution that argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution As a
Match 164 (1): Reference (008779 .. 008794, of 36359): Subject (018746 .. 018761, of 34107):
proposed by both Professors Behe and Minnich is to grow the bacterial flagellum in the laboratory proposed by both Professors Behe and Minnich is to grow the bacterial flagellum in the laboratory
Match 165 (1): Reference (008823 .. 008832, of 36359): Subject (018793 .. 018802, of 34107):
that the proposed test could not approximate real world conditions that the proposed test could not approximate real world conditions
Match 166 (1): Reference (008848 .. 008867, of 36359): Subject (017292 .. 017317, of 34107):
evolution not design 2 15 Miller a point conceded by Professor Minnich 38 82 it s not a test of evolution not proof of design a point conceded by defense expert Professor Minnich 2 15 Miller 38 82 Minnich irreducible complexity is not a test of
Match 167 (1): Reference (008879 .. 008908, of 36359): Subject (018836 .. 018867, of 34107):
Professor Behe s claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community 17 45 46 Padian 3 99 Miller Professor Behe s claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large 17 45 46 Padian 3 99 Miller
Match 168 (1): Reference (008910 .. 008922, of 36359): Subject (018869 .. 018881, of 34107):
even if irreducible complexity had not been rejected it still does not support even if irreducible complexity had not been rejected it still does not support
Match 169 (1): Reference (008941 .. 008952, of 36359): Subject (018884 .. 018898, of 34107):
complexity is merely a test for evolution not design 2 15 Miller it is merely a test for evolution not design 2 15 2 35 40 Miller
Match 170 (1): Reference (009009 .. 009022, of 36359): Subject (005183 .. 005198, of 34107):
by Professors Behe and Minnich is encompassed in the phrase purposeful arrangement of parts by defense expert witnesses Professors Behe and Minnich who employ the phrase purposeful arrangement of parts
Match 171 (1): Reference (009113 .. 009122, of 36359): Subject (019649 .. 019661, of 34107):
that the positive inductive argument for design is in the at 705 Accordingly the purported positive argument for ID does not satisfy the
Match 172 (1): Reference (009120 .. 009228, of 36359): Subject (018930 .. 019037, of 34107):
is in the purposeful arrangement of parts o 83 Professor Behe summarized the argument as follows We infer design when we see parts that appear to be arranged for a purpose The strength of the inference is quantitative the more parts that are arranged and the more intricately they interact the stronger is our confidence in design The appearance of design in aspects of biology is overwhelming Since nothing other than an intelligent cause has been demonstrated to be able to yield such a strong appearance of design Darwinian claims notwithstanding the conclusion that the design seen in life is real design is rationally justified 18 90 91 Behe is the purposeful arrangement of parts Professor Behe summarized the argument as follows We infer design when we see parts that appear to be arranged for a purpose The strength of the inference is quantitative the more parts that are arranged the more intricately they interact the stronger is our confidence in design The appearance of design in aspects of biology is overwhelming Since nothing other than an intelligent cause has been demonstrated to be able to yield such a strong appearance of design Darwinian claims notwithstanding the conclusion that the design seen in life is real design is rationally justified 18 90 91 18 109 10 Behe
Match 173 (1): Reference (009249 .. 009262, of 36359): Subject (019048 .. 019061, of 34107):
a restatement of the Reverend William Paley s argument applied at the cell level a restatement of the Reverend William Paley s argument applied at the cell level
Match 174 (1): Reference (009270 .. 009312, of 36359): Subject (019062 .. 019103, of 34107):
Minnich Minnich Behe and Paley reach the same conclusion that complex organisms must have been designed using the same reasoning except that Professors Behe and Minnich refuse to identify the designer whereas Paley inferred from the presence of design that it was God Minnich Behe and Paley reach the same conclusion that complex organisms must have been designed using the same reasoning except that Professors Behe and Minnich refuse to identify the designer whereas Paley inferred from the presence of design that it was God
Match 175 (1): Reference (009326 .. 009336, of 36359): Subject (019126 .. 019137, of 34107):
Professor Behe admitted it can never be ruled out 22 101 Professor Behe can never be ruled out 2 40 Miller 22 101
Match 176 (1): Reference (009345 .. 009367, of 36359): Subject (019144 .. 019166, of 34107):
assertion that design of biological systems can be inferred from the purposeful arrangement of parts is based on an analogy to human design assertion that design of biological systems can be inferred from the purposeful arrangement of parts is based upon an analogy to human design
Match 177 (1): Reference (009372 .. 009382, of 36359): Subject (019167 .. 019177, of 34107):
because we are able to recognize design of artifacts and objects Because we are able to recognize design of artifacts and objects
Match 178 (1): Reference (009383 .. 009419, of 36359): Subject (019182 .. 019217, of 34107):
that same reasoning can be employed to determine biological design 18 116 17 23 50 o 87 Professor Behe testified that the strength of an analogy depends on the degree of similarity entailed in the two propositions that same reasoning can be employed to determine biological design 18 116 17 23 50 Behe Professor Behe testified that the strength of the analogy depends upon the degree of similarity entailed in the two propositions
Match 179 (1): Reference (009429 .. 009471, of 36359): Subject (019225 .. 019264, of 34107):
completely fails o 88 Unlike biological systems human artifacts do not live and reproduce over deep time They are non replicable they don t undergo genetic recombination and they are not driven by natural selection 1 131 33 Miller 23 57 59 Behe completely fails Unlike biological systems human artifacts do not live and reproduce over time They are non replicable they do not undergo genetic recombination and they are not driven by natural selection 1 131 33 Miller 23 57 59 Behe
Match 180 (1): Reference (009529 .. 009542, of 36359): Subject (019265 .. 019279, of 34107):
For human artifacts we know the designer s identity human the mechanism of design For human artifacts we know the designer s identity human and the mechanism of design
Match 181 (1): Reference (009544 .. 009556, of 36359): Subject (019281 .. 019293, of 34107):
we have experience based on empirical evidence that humans can make such things we have experience based upon empirical evidence that humans can make such things
Match 182 (1): Reference (009571 .. 009582, of 36359): Subject (019312 .. 019323, of 34107):
1 131 33 Miller 23 63 Behe 5 55 58 Pennock With 1 131 33 Miller 23 63 Behe 5 55 58 Pennock With
Match 183 (1): Reference (009587 .. 009612, of 36359): Subject (019327 .. 019353, of 34107):
that they refuse to propose hypotheses on the designer s identity do not propose a mechanism and he she it or they has never been seen that they refuse to propose hypotheses on the designer s identity do not propose a mechanism and the designer he she it they has never been seen
Match 184 (1): Reference (009613 .. 009628, of 36359): Subject (019359 .. 019373, of 34107):
Professor Minnich agreed that in the case of human artifacts and objects we know who the Professor Minnich agreed that in the case of human artifacts and objects we know the
Match 185 (1): Reference (009621 .. 009633, of 36359): Subject (019266 .. 019276, of 34107):
human artifacts and objects we know who the designer is and what the human artifacts we know the designer s identity human and the
Match 186 (1): Reference (009638 .. 009662, of 36359): Subject (019381 .. 019410, of 34107):
but that we don t know any of those attributes for the designer of biological life 38 44 47 Professor Behe agreed that for human but we do not know any of those attributes for the designer of biological life 38 44 47 Minnich In addition Professor Behe agreed that for the design of human
Match 187 (1): Reference (009680 .. 009697, of 36359): Subject (019419 .. 019436, of 34107):
and we have a baseline for human design that does not exist for design of biological systems 23 and we have a baseline for human design that does not exist for design of biological systems 23
Match 188 (1): Reference (009699 .. 009722, of 36359): Subject (019438 .. 019463, of 34107):
73 Professor Behe s only response to these insurmountable points of disanalogy was that the inference still works in science fiction movies 23 73 73 Behe Professor Behe s only response to these seemingly insurmountable points of disanalogy was that the inference still works in science fiction movies 23 73
Match 189 (1): Reference (009726 .. 009755, of 36359): Subject (019473 .. 019506, of 34107):
the only attribute of design that biological systems share with human artifacts is their complex appearance if it looks complex or designed it must have been designed 23 73 Behe the only attribute of design that biological systems appear to share with human artifacts is their complex appearance i e if it looks complex or designed it must have been designed 23 73 Behe
Match 190 (1): Reference (009833 .. 009861, of 36359): Subject (019507 .. 019533, of 34107):
This inference to design based on the appearance of a purposeful arrangement of parts is a completely subjective proposition determined in the eye of each beholder Both Behe and This inference to design based upon the appearance of a purposeful arrangement of parts is a completely subjective proposition determined in the eye of each beholder and
Match 191 (1): Reference (009859 .. 009906, of 36359): Subject (019544 .. 019593, of 34107):
Both Behe and Minnich asserted that there is a quantitative aspect to the inference but on cross examination admitted there is no quantitative criteria for determining the degree of complexity or number of parts that bespeak design rather than a natural process 23 50 Behe 38 59 Minnich both Professors Behe and Minnich assert that there is a quantitative aspect to the inference on cross examination they admitted that there is no quantitative criteria for determining the degree of complexity or number of parts that bespeak design rather than a natural process 23 50 Behe 38 59 Minnich
Match 192 (1): Reference (009910 .. 009928, of 36359): Subject (019602 .. 019617, of 34107):
the entire trial there was only one piece of evidence generated by defendants that addressed the strength of the the entire trial only one piece of evidence generated by Defendants addressed the strength of the
Match 193 (1): Reference (009931 .. 009958, of 36359): Subject (019619 .. 019646, of 34107):
inference the argument is less plausible to those for whom God s existence is in question and is much less plausible for those who deny God s existence inference the argument is less plausible to those for whom God s existence is in question and is much less plausible for those who deny God s existence
Match 194 (1): Reference (009985 .. 010004, of 36359): Subject (019658 .. 019677, of 34107):
does not satisfy the ground rules of science which require testable hypotheses based on natural explanations 3 101 03 Miller does not satisfy the ground rules of science which require testable hypotheses based upon natural explanations 3 101 03 Miller
Match 195 (1): Reference (010008 .. 010034, of 36359): Subject (019681 .. 019705, of 34107):
on forces acting outside the natural world forces that we cannot see replicate control or test which have produced changes in this world 3 101 Miller While upon forces acting outside of the natural world forces that we cannot see replicate control or test which have produced changes in this world While
Match 196 (1): Reference (010058 .. 010084, of 36359): Subject (019715 .. 019741, of 34107):
they are not testable by science and therefore cannot qualify as part of the scientific process or as a scientific hypothesis or theory 3 101 02 Miller they are simply not testable by scientific means and therefore cannot qualify as part of the scientific process or as a scientific theory 3 101 02 Miller
Match 197 (1): Reference (010105 .. 010162, of 36359): Subject (019760 .. 019814, of 34107):
that evolutionary theory cannot account for life s complexity by pointing not only to real gaps in scientific knowledge which indisputably exist in all scientific theories but also by misrepresenting well established scientific propositions 1 112 1 122 1 136 37 Miller 16 74 79 17 45 46 Padian o 94 Before discussing defendants claims about evolution in that evolutionary theory cannot account for life s complexity by pointing to real gaps in scientific knowledge which indisputably exist in all scientific theories but also by misrepresenting well established scientific propositions 1 112 1 122 1 136 37 Miller 16 74 79 17 45 46 Padian Before discussing Defendants claims about evolution we initially
Match 198 (1): Reference (010171 .. 010183, of 36359): Subject (019818 .. 019830, of 34107):
overwhelming number of scientists as reflected by every scientific association that has spoken overwhelming number of scientists as reflected by every scientific association that has spoken
Match 199 (1): Reference (010331 .. 010348, of 36359): Subject (019843 .. 019856, of 34107):
plaintiffs expert in biology explained evolutionary theory Dr Miller is a widely recognized biology professor at Brown University Plaintiffs expert in biology Dr Miller a widely recognized biology professor at Brown University
Match 200 (1): Reference (010703 .. 010718, of 36359): Subject (019884 .. 019899, of 34107):
overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community and that every major scientific association agrees 1 94 100 overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community and that every major scientific association agrees 1 94 100
Match 201 (1): Reference (010800 .. 010810, of 36359): Subject (019947 .. 019957, of 34107):
Despite the scientific community s overwhelming support for evolution defendants and Despite the scientific community s overwhelming support for evolution Defendants and
Match 202 (1): Reference (010813 .. 010830, of 36359): Subject (019959 .. 019977, of 34107):
proponents insist that evolution is unsupported by empirical evidence Plaintiffs science experts Drs Miller and Padian explained how proponents insist that evolution is unsupported by empirical evidence Plaintiffs science experts Drs Miller and Padian clearly explained how
Match 203 (1): Reference (010833 .. 010848, of 36359): Subject (019979 .. 019994, of 34107):
proponents generally and Pandas specifically distort and misrepresent scientific knowledge in making the anti evolution argument proponents generally and Pandas specifically distort and misrepresent scientific knowledge in making their anti evolution argument
Match 204 (1): Reference (010882 .. 010903, of 36359): Subject (000225 .. 000246, of 34107):
Of Pandas and People is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves Of Pandas and People is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually involves
Match 205 (1): Reference (010926 .. 010949, of 36359): Subject (020040 .. 020060, of 34107):
of the arguments against evolutionary theory in Of Pandas and People involve paleontology which studies the life of the past and the fossil record of arguments against evolutionary theory found in Pandas involve paleontology which studies the life of the past and the fossil record
Match 206 (1): Reference (010958 .. 010969, of 36359): Subject (020065 .. 020076, of 34107):
Padian was the only testifying expert witness with any expertise in paleontology an was the only testifying expert witness with any expertise in paleontology
Match 207 (1): Reference (011058 .. 011067, of 36359): Subject (021918 .. 021927, of 34107):
no evidence that either defendants testifying experts or any other no evidence that either Defendants testifying experts or any other
Match 208 (1): Reference (011078 .. 011099, of 36359): Subject (021946 .. 021968, of 34107):
they have not published peer reviewed literature or presented at scientific conferences on paleontology or the fossil record 17 15 16 Padian they have published peer reviewed literature or presented such information at scientific conferences on paleontology or the fossil record 17 15 16 Padian
Match 209 (1): Reference (011147 .. 011160, of 36359): Subject (020099 .. 020108, of 34107):
how Of Pandas and People systematically distorts and misrepresents established and important evolutionary principles how Pandas systematically distorts and misrepresents established important evolutionary principles
Match 210 (1): Reference (011163 .. 011189, of 36359): Subject (020119 .. 020145, of 34107):
Pandas misrepresents the dominant form of understanding relationships between organisms namely the tree of life represented by classification determined via the method of cladistics 16 87 97 Pandas misrepresents the dominant form of understanding relationships between organisms namely the tree of life represented by classification determined via the method of cladistics 16 87 97
Match 211 (1): Reference (011191 .. 011205, of 36359): Subject (020148 .. 020162, of 34107):
P855 6 855 19 Pandas also misrepresents homology the central concept of comparative biology that 855 6 855 19 Second Pandas misrepresents homology the central concept of comparative biology that
Match 212 (1): Reference (011211 .. 011221, of 36359): Subject (020163 .. 020173, of 34107):
allowed scientists to compare comparable parts among organisms for classification purposes allowed scientists to evaluate comparable parts among organisms for classification purposes
Match 213 (1): Reference (011230 .. 011248, of 36359): Subject (020188 .. 020204, of 34107):
Pandas fails to address at all the well established biological concept of exaptation which involves a structure changing function Pandas fails to address the well established biological concept of exaptation which involves a structure changing function
Match 214 (1): Reference (011250 .. 011263, of 36359): Subject (020207 .. 020220, of 34107):
fish fins evolving fingers and bones to become legs for weight bearing land animals fish fins evolving fingers and bones to become legs for weight bearing land animals
Match 215 (1): Reference (011298 .. 011316, of 36359): Subject (020233 .. 020251, of 34107):
address exaptation because they deny that organisms change function a view necessary to support the abrupt appearance argument Id address exaptation because they deny that organisms change function which is a view necessary to support abrupt appearance Id
Match 216 (1): Reference (011319 .. 011340, of 36359): Subject (020253 .. 020273, of 34107):
Dr Padian s unrebutted testimony also demonstrates that Pandas distorts and misrepresents evidence in the fossil record about pre Cambrian era fossils Dr Padian s unrebutted testimony demonstrates that Pandas distorts and misrepresents evidence in the fossil record about pre Cambrian era fossils
Match 217 (1): Reference (011392 .. 011401, of 36359): Subject (020295 .. 020307, of 34107):
and the evolution of whales from land animals 17 17 and the evolution of whales from land animals 16 107 17 16 117
Match 218 (1): Reference (011544 .. 011559, of 36359): Subject (020358 .. 020373, of 34107):
Dr Miller testified that Pandas treatment of biochemical similarities between organisms is inaccurate and downright false Dr Miller testified that Pandas treatment of biochemical similarities between organisms is inaccurate and downright false
Match 219 (1): Reference (011576 .. 011585, of 36359): Subject (020376 .. 020386, of 34107):
how Pandas misrepresents basic molecular biology concepts to advance the how Pandas misrepresents basic molecular biology concepts to advance design theory
Match 220 (1): Reference (011589 .. 011605, of 36359): Subject (020398 .. 020417, of 34107):
example he testified how Pandas misinforms readers on the standard evolutionary relationships between different types of animals example that he testified as to how Pandas misinforms readers on the standard evolutionary relationships between different types of animals
Match 221 (1): Reference (011621 .. 011634, of 36359): Subject (020452 .. 020464, of 34107):
Dr Miller also refuted Pandas claim that evolution cannot account for new genetic information Dr Miller refuted Pandas claim that evolution cannot account for new genetic information
Match 222 (1): Reference (011637 .. 011673, of 36359): Subject (020466 .. 020504, of 34107):
pointed to more than three dozen peer reviewed scientific publications showing the origin of new genetic information by evolutionary processes 1 133 36 P245 In sum Dr Miller testified that Pandas misrepresents molecular biology and genetics principles pointed to more than three dozen peer reviewed scientific publications showing the origin of new genetic information by evolutionary processes 1 133 36 Miller P 245 In summary Dr Miller testified that Pandas misrepresents molecular biology and genetic principles
Match 223 (1): Reference (011675 .. 011701, of 36359): Subject (020508 .. 020534, of 34107):
the current state of scientific knowledge in those areas in order to teach readers that common descent and natural selection are not scientifically sound 1 139 42 the current state of scientific knowledge in those areas in order to teach readers that common descent and natural selection are not scientifically sound 1 139 42
Match 224 (1): Reference (011774 .. 011790, of 36359): Subject (020537 .. 020554, of 34107):
the one textbook to which the Dover policy directs students contains badly flawed and scientifically refuted science the one textbook to which the Dover ID Policy directs students contains outdated concepts and badly flawed science
Match 225 (1): Reference (011818 .. 011833, of 36359): Subject (020571 .. 020586, of 34107):
has failed to demonstrate scientific warrant is the complete absence of peer reviewed publications supporting the has failed to demonstrate scientific warrant is the complete absence of peer reviewed publications supporting the
Match 226 (1): Reference (011833 .. 011843, of 36359): Subject (020592 .. 020602, of 34107):
the concept Peer review is exquisitely important in the scientific process the peer review process is exquisitely important in the scientific process
Match 227 (1): Reference (011849 .. 011883, of 36359): Subject (020604 .. 020638, of 34107):
is a way for scientists to write up their empirical research and to share the work with fellow experts in the field opening up the hypotheses to study testing and criticism 1 66 69 Miller is a way for scientists to write up their empirical research and to share the work with fellow experts in the field opening up the hypotheses to study testing and criticism 1 66 69 Miller
Match 228 (1): Reference (011884 .. 011917, of 36359): Subject (020666 .. 020697, of 34107):
Peer review helps to ensure that research papers are scientifically accurate meet the standards of the scientific method and are relevant and interesting to other scientists in the field 1 39 40 Miller o Peer review helps to ensure that research papers are scientifically accurately meet the standards of the scientific method and are relevant to other scientists in the field 1 39 40 Miller Moreover
Match 229 (1): Reference (011919 .. 011935, of 36359): Subject (020698 .. 020713, of 34107):
Peer review involves scientists submitting a manuscript to a scientific journal in the field The journal editors peer review involves scientists submitting a manuscript to a scientific journal in the field journal editors
Match 230 (1): Reference (011919 .. 011945, of 36359): Subject (020698 .. 020722, of 34107):
Peer review involves scientists submitting a manuscript to a scientific journal in the field The journal editors will solicit critical reviews from other experts in the field peer review involves scientists submitting a manuscript to a scientific journal in the field journal editors soliciting critical reviews from other experts in the field
Match 231 (1): Reference (011948 .. 011966, of 36359): Subject (020724 .. 020742, of 34107):
decide whether the scientist has followed proper research procedures employed up to date methods considered and cited relevant literature deciding whether the scientist has followed proper research procedures employed up to date methods considered and cited relevant literature
Match 232 (1): Reference (011973 .. 011982, of 36359): Subject (020743 .. 020752, of 34107):
and generally whether the researcher has employed sound science The and generally whether the researcher has employed sound science The
Match 233 (1): Reference (012075 .. 012087, of 36359): Subject (020642 .. 020652, of 34107):
expert Professor Behe recognizes the importance to science of the peer review process expert Professor Behe recognizes the importance of the peer review process
Match 234 (1): Reference (012091 .. 012100, of 36359): Subject (020654 .. 020663, of 34107):
has written that science must publish or perish 22 19 has written that science must publish or perish 22 19
Match 235 (1): Reference (012304 .. 012315, of 36359): Subject (020761 .. 020772, of 34107):
is not supported by any peer reviewed research data or publications Both is not supported by any peer reviewed research data or publications Both
Match 236 (1): Reference (012304 .. 012338, of 36359): Subject (020761 .. 020795, of 34107):
is not supported by any peer reviewed research data or publications Both Doctors Padian and Forrest testified that recent literature reviews of scientific and medical electronic databases disclosed no studies supporting a biological concept of is not supported by any peer reviewed research data or publications Both Drs Padian and Forrest testified that recent literature reviews of scientific and medical electronic databases disclosed no studies supporting a biological concept of
Match 237 (1): Reference (012351 .. 012393, of 36359): Subject (020808 .. 020847, of 34107):
Professor Behe under cross examination admitted that There are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred 22 22 23 Behe Professor Behe admitted that There are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred 22 22 23 Behe
Match 238 (1): Reference (012397 .. 012443, of 36359): Subject (020852 .. 020898, of 34107):
that there were no peer reviewed papers supporting his claims that complex molecular systems like the bacterial flagellum the blood clotting cascade and the immune system were intelligently designed 21 61 62 complex molecular systems 23 4 5 immune system and 22 124 25 blood clotting cascade that there are no peer reviewed papers supporting his claims that complex molecular systems like the bacterial flagellum the blood clotting cascade and the immune system were intelligently designed 21 61 62 complex molecular systems 23 4 5 immune system and 22 124 25 blood clotting cascade
Match 239 (1): Reference (012447 .. 012470, of 36359): Subject (020903 .. 020927, of 34107):
there are no peer reviewed articles supporting Professor Behe s argument that certain complex molecular structures are irreducibly complex 21 62 22 124 25 there are no peer reviewed articles supporting Professor Behe s argument that certain complex molecular structures are irreducibly complex 17 21 62 22 124 25
Match 240 (1): Reference (012471 .. 012481, of 36359): Subject (022026 .. 022037, of 34107):
The one article referenced by Professors Behe and Minnich as supporting 17The one article referenced by both Professors Behe and Minnich as supporting
Match 241 (1): Reference (012484 .. 012501, of 36359): Subject (022044 .. 022062, of 34107):
Behe and Snoke Simulating evolution by gene duplication of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues Protein Behe and Snoke entitled Simulating evolution by gene duplication of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues P
Match 242 (1): Reference (012520 .. 012546, of 36359): Subject (022095 .. 022121, of 34107):
did not rule out many known evolutionary mechanisms and that the research actually might support evolutionary pathways if a biologically realistic population size were used 22 41 did not rule out many known evolutionary mechanisms and that the research actually might support evolutionary pathways if a biologically realistic population size were used 22 41
Match 243 (1): Reference (012562 .. 012578, of 36359): Subject (020941 .. 020957, of 34107):
also features no scientific research or testing 28 114 115 Fuller 18 22 23 105 106 Behe also features no scientific research or testing 28 114 15 Fuller 18 22 23 105 06 Behe
Match 244 (1): Reference (012602 .. 012621, of 36359): Subject (021005 .. 021024, of 34107):
has failed to publish in peer reviewed journals engage in research and testing and gain acceptance in the scientific community has failed to publish in peer reviewed journals engage in research and testing and gain acceptance in the scientific community
Match 245 (1): Reference (012645 .. 012657, of 36359): Subject (015339 .. 015351, of 34107):
arguments may be true a proposition on which the Court takes no position arguments may be true a proposition on which the Court takes no position
Match 246 (1): Reference (012752 .. 012762, of 36359): Subject (001129 .. 001139, of 34107):
is comprised of Dover Township Washington Township and Dover Borough all is comprised of Dover Township Washington Township and Dover Borough all
Match 247 (1): Reference (012763 .. 012774, of 36359): Subject (001144 .. 001155, of 34107):
in York County Pennsylvania There are approximately 3 700 students in the in York County Pennsylvania There are approximately 3 700 students in the
Match 248 (1): Reference (012777 .. 012790, of 36359): Subject (001157 .. 001172, of 34107):
with approximately 1 000 attending Dover High School Joint Stipulations of Fact 3 o with approximately 1 000 attending Dover High School Joint Stip of Fact 3 The trial commenced
Match 249 (1): Reference (012794 .. 012826, of 36359): Subject (022816 .. 022845, of 34107):
nine seats on the Board The nine members of the Board in 2004 were Alan Bonsell William Buckingham Sheila Harkins Jane Cleaver Heather Geesey Angie Yingling Noel Wenrich Jeff Brown and Casey Brown nine seats The nine members of the Board in 2004 were Alan Bonsell William Buckingham Sheila Harkins Jane Cleaver Heather Geesey Angie Yingling Noel Wenrich Jeff Brown and Casey Brown
Match 250 (1): Reference (012827 .. 012837, of 36359): Subject (022854 .. 022863, of 34107):
Casey and Jeff Brown resigned on October 18 2004 Wenrich and Casey and Jeff Brown resigned on October 18 2004 and
Match 251 (1): Reference (012839 .. 012858, of 36359): Subject (022858 .. 022881, of 34107):
resigned on October 4 2004 and Yingling resigned verbally in November 2004 and in writing in February 2004 34 113 resigned on October 18 2004 and Yingling resigned verbally in November 2004 and in writing February 2005 Trial Tr vol 34 Harkins Test 113
Match 252 (1): Reference (012850 .. 012859, of 36359): Subject (022862 .. 022879, of 34107):
2004 and in writing in February 2004 34 113 Harkins 2004 and Yingling resigned verbally in November 2004 and in writing February 2005 Trial Tr vol 34 Harkins
Match 253 (1): Reference (012879 .. 012893, of 36359): Subject (022902 .. 022917, of 34107):
President he appointed William Buckingham Chair of the Board s Curriculum Committee 32 86 87 President he appointed Buckingham to be Chair of the Board s Curriculum Committee 32 86 87
Match 254 (1): Reference (012909 .. 012918, of 36359): Subject (022915 .. 022924, of 34107):
32 86 87 Bonsell 34 39 Harkins As Board President 32 86 87 Bonsell 34 39 Harkins As Board President
Match 255 (1): Reference (012920 .. 012933, of 36359): Subject (022926 .. 022939, of 34107):
also served as an ex officio member of the Curriculum Committee 32 116 Bonsell also served as an ex officio member of the Curriculum Committee 32 116 Bonsell
Match 256 (1): Reference (012976 .. 012987, of 36359): Subject (000590 .. 000601, of 34107):
first learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers first learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers
Match 257 (1): Reference (013031 .. 013043, of 36359): Subject (000629 .. 000641, of 34107):
in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age
Match 258 (1): Reference (013054 .. 013089, of 36359): Subject (000652 .. 000684, of 34107):
Bryan Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of being a member of the science faculty at Dover Area High School 4 39 41 Before and after his resignation he regularly attended Board meetings Bryan Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of being a member of the science faculty at Dover Area High School Before and after his resignation he regularly attended Board meetings
Match 259 (1): Reference (013095 .. 013111, of 36359): Subject (000689 .. 000705, of 34107):
Christy Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of discussions she had with her husband Christy Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of discussions she had with her husband
Match 260 (1): Reference (013138 .. 013159, of 36359): Subject (000712 .. 000732, of 34107):
Plaintiffs Deborah F Fenimore and Joel A Leib are residents of Dover Pennsylvania They are the parents of a child in the in 2004 Deborah F Fenimore and Joel A Leib residents of Dover Pennsylvania are the parents of a child in the
Match 261 (1): Reference (013154 .. 013178, of 36359): Subject (000786 .. 000809, of 34107):
parents of a child in the eighth grade in the Dover Area School District and intend to send their child to Dover Area High School parent of a child in the eighth grade in the Dover Area School District and intends for his child to attend Dover High School
Match 262 (1): Reference (013184 .. 013196, of 36359): Subject (000590 .. 000601, of 34107):
first learned of a change in the biology curriculum from reading local newspapers first learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers
Match 263 (1): Reference (013214 .. 013225, of 36359): Subject (000619 .. 000634, of 34107):
a child in the ninth grade in the Dover Area School District a child in the second grade a child in kindergarden in the Dover Area School District
Match 264 (1): Reference (013229 .. 013254, of 36359): Subject (000810 .. 000836, of 34107):
Stough did not attend any board meetings until December 2004 Prior to that he had learned of the biology curriculum change by reading the local newspapers Stough did not attend any Board meetings until December 2004 and prior to that he had learned of the biology curriculum change by reading the local newspapers
Match 265 (1): Reference (013261 .. 013278, of 36359): Subject (000837 .. 000851, of 34107):
Beth A Eveland is a resident of York Pennsylvania She is the parent of a child in the Beth A Eveland resident of York Pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the
Match 266 (1): Reference (013275 .. 013293, of 36359): Subject (000619 .. 000641, of 34107):
a child in the second grade in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age a child in the second grade a child in kindergarden in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age
Match 267 (1): Reference (013295 .. 013341, of 36359): Subject (000868 .. 000909, of 34107):
intends to send her children to Dover Area High School 6 92 93 Eveland Eveland attended her first board meeting on June 14 2004 Prior to that she had learned of the issues relating to the purchase of the biology books from reading the York Daily Record intends for her children to attend Dover High School Eveland attended her first Board meeting on June 14 2004 Prior to that she had learned of the issues relating to the purchase of the biology books from reading the York Daily Record
Match 268 (1): Reference (013347 .. 013363, of 36359): Subject (000911 .. 000924, of 34107):
Cynthia Sneath is a resident of Dover Pennsylvania She is a parent of a child in the Cynthia Sneath resident of Dover Pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the
Match 269 (1): Reference (013360 .. 013378, of 36359): Subject (000619 .. 000641, of 34107):
a child in the second grade in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age a child in the second grade a child in kindergarden in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age
Match 270 (1): Reference (013380 .. 013419, of 36359): Subject (000941 .. 000976, of 34107):
intends to send her children to Dover Area High School 15 75 76 Sneath Sneath attended her first board meeting on October 18 2004 Prior to that she had learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers intends for her children to attend Dover High School Sneath attended her first Board meeting on October 18 2004 and prior to that she had learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers
Match 271 (1): Reference (013429 .. 013442, of 36359): Subject (000839 .. 000851, of 34107):
a resident of York Pennsylvania She is a parent of a child in the Eveland resident of York Pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the
Match 272 (1): Reference (013439 .. 013449, of 36359): Subject (000568 .. 000577, of 34107):
a child in the eleventh grade at Dover Area High School a child in the eleventh grade at Dover High School
Match 273 (1): Reference (013467 .. 013477, of 36359): Subject (000654 .. 000667, of 34107):
learned of and followed the biology curriculum controversy by reading the learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of being a member of the
Match 274 (1): Reference (013467 .. 013479, of 36359): Subject (001007 .. 001019, of 34107):
learned of and followed the biology curriculum controversy by reading the local newspapers learned of and followed the biology curriculum controversy by reading the local newspapers
Match 275 (1): Reference (013489 .. 013512, of 36359): Subject (001024 .. 001044, of 34107):
and Frederick B Callahan are residents of Dover Pennsylvania They are parents of a child in the eleventh grade at Dover Area High School and Frederick B Callahan residents of Dover Pennsylvania are parents of a child in the tenth grade at Dover High School
Match 276 (1): Reference (013489 .. 013517, of 36359): Subject (001024 .. 001046, of 34107):
and Frederick B Callahan are residents of Dover Pennsylvania They are parents of a child in the eleventh grade at Dover Area High School 3 123 124 B Callahan and Frederick B Callahan residents of Dover Pennsylvania are parents of a child in the tenth grade at Dover High School Barrie Callahan
Match 277 (1): Reference (013521 .. 013544, of 36359): Subject (001046 .. 001067, of 34107):
Callahan Aralene Callahan learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of her status as a former board member and from attending board meetings Callahan learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of her status of a former Board member and from attending Board meetings
Match 278 (1): Reference (013550 .. 013559, of 36359): Subject (001046 .. 001055, of 34107):
Callahan learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of Callahan learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of
Match 279 (1): Reference (013551 .. 013563, of 36359): Subject (000691 .. 000703, of 34107):
learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of discussions he had with learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of discussions she had with
Match 280 (1): Reference (013819 .. 013845, of 36359): Subject (022950 .. 022973, of 34107):
Interest in Injecting Religion Into the Dover Schools o 135 The Board held a retreat on January 9 2002 just several weeks after Bonsell joined the Board Interest to Inject Religion into the Dover Schools The Board held a retreat on January 9 2002 several weeks after Bonsell joined the Board
Match 281 (1): Reference (013871 .. 013883, of 36359): Subject (022974 .. 022988, of 34107):
Superintendent Nilsen s contemporaneous notes Bonsell identified creationism as his number one issue Superintendent Nilsen s contemporaneous notes reveal that Bonsell identified creationism as his number one issue
Match 282 (1): Reference (013915 .. 013959, of 36359): Subject (033925 .. 033974, of 34107):
Casey Brown testified that she recalled that Bonsell expressed a desire to look into bringing prayer and faith back into the schools that Bonsell mentioned the Bible and creationism and felt there should be a fair and balanced presentation within the curriculum 7 17 18 Casey Brown testified she recalled that Bonsell expressed a desire to look into bringing prayer and faith back into the schools that Bonsell mentioned the Bible and creationism and felt there should be a fair and balanced presentation within the curriculum Trial Tr vol 7 C Brown Test 17 18
Match 283 (1): Reference (013989 .. 014004, of 36359): Subject (023063 .. 023077, of 34107):
issues of interest as reflected in P25 Dr Nilsen s contemporaneous notes 35 50 53 Baksa issue of interest as reflected in Dr Nilsen s contemporaneous notes 35 50 53 Baksa
Match 284 (1): Reference (014037 .. 014055, of 36359): Subject (023135 .. 023153, of 34107):
recalled Bonsell saying at the March 26 2003 retreat that he felt creationism belong in biology class alongside evolution Recalled Bonsell say at the March 26 2003 retreat that he felt creationism belonged in biology class alongside evolution
Match 285 (1): Reference (014072 .. 014082, of 36359): Subject (023138 .. 023145, of 34107):
at the March 26 2003 board retreat Bonsell said that he at the March 26 2003 retreat that he
Match 286 (1): Reference (014081 .. 014092, of 36359): Subject (023171 .. 023184, of 34107):
that he wanted creationism taught 50 50 with evolution in biology class that Bonsell said he wanted creationism taught 50 50 with evolution in biology class
Match 287 (1): Reference (014164 .. 014174, of 36359): Subject (023302 .. 023312, of 34107):
Nilsen s contemporaneous note that Bonsell raised the issue of creationism Nilsen s contemporaneous note that Bonsell raised the issue of creationism
Match 288 (1): Reference (014182 .. 014205, of 36359): Subject (023187 .. 023212, of 34107):
Trudy Peterman then the principal of Dover High School sent to Assistant Superintendent Baksa and Science Department Chair Bertha Spahr with a copy to Trudy Peterman then principal of Dover High School sent a memo to Assistant Superintendent Baksa and Science Department Chair Bertha Spahr with a copy sent to
Match 289 (1): Reference (014213 .. 014248, of 36359): Subject (023220 .. 023255, of 34107):
memo reports that Peterman learned from Spahr that Baksa had said on March 31 2003 that an unidentified board member wanted fifty percent 50 of the topic of evolution to involve the teaching of Creationism o memo reports that Peterman learned from Spahr that Baksa said on March 31 2003 that an unidentified Board member wanted fifty percent of the topic of evolution to involve the teaching of Creationism P 26 Although
Match 290 (1): Reference (014250 .. 014289, of 36359): Subject (023321 .. 023360, of 34107):
Spahr confirmed that she had a conversation with Baksa as reported in the Peterman memo P26 and that Baksa told her that Bonsell wanted to have creationism share equal time with evolution in the curriculum 13 72 73 Spahr o Spahr confirmed that she had a conversation with Baksa as reported in the Peterman memo and that Baksa told her Bonsell wanted to have creationism share equal time with evolution in the curriculum 13 72 73 Spahr Third Baksa confirmed
Match 291 (1): Reference (014291 .. 014330, of 36359): Subject (023359 .. 023396, of 34107):
Baksa also confirmed that he had a conversation with Spahr as reported in the Peterman memo P26 in which he told her that Bonsell was looking for a 50 50 split with Darwin and some alternative 35 53 56 Baksa Baksa confirmed that he had a conversation with Spahr as reported in the Peterman memo in which he told her that Bonsell was looking for a 50 50 split with Darwin and some alternative 35 53 56 Baksa
Match 292 (1): Reference (014351 .. 014369, of 36359): Subject (023398 .. 023419, of 34107):
Baksa does not recall is Bonsell identifying creationism as the subject he wanted to share equal time with evolution Baksa claims he does not recall Bonsell identifying creationism as the subject with which he wanted to share equal time with evolution
Match 293 (1): Reference (014377 .. 014391, of 36359): Subject (023421 .. 023432, of 34107):
that he cannot recall Bonsell mentioning creationism at any time up until April 1 2003 that Bonsell mentioned creationism at any time up until April 1 2003
Match 294 (1): Reference (014572 .. 014582, of 36359): Subject (023337 .. 023353, of 34107):
that he wanted evolution to share equal time in the curriculum that Baksa told her Bonsell wanted to have creationism share equal time with evolution in the curriculum
Match 295 (1): Reference (014572 .. 014584, of 36359): Subject (023337 .. 023350, of 34107):
that he wanted evolution to share equal time in the curriculum with evolution that Baksa told her Bonsell wanted to have creationism share equal time with evolution
Match 296 (1): Reference (014573 .. 014585, of 36359): Subject (023412 .. 023422, of 34107):
he wanted evolution to share equal time in the curriculum with evolution Bonsell he wanted to share equal time with evolution nor that Bonsell
Match 297 (1): Reference (014589 .. 014613, of 36359): Subject (023487 .. 023512, of 34107):
of creationism on numerous other occasions a When he ran for the Board in 2001 Bonsell told Jeff Brown he did not believe in evolution of creationism on numerous other occasions as well When he ran for the Board in 2001 Bonsell told Jeff Brown he did not believe in evolution
Match 298 (1): Reference (014615 .. 014626, of 36359): Subject (023514 .. 023525, of 34107):
he wanted creationism taught side by side with evolution in biology classes he wanted creationism taught side by side with evolution in biology class
Match 299 (1): Reference (014632 .. 014642, of 36359): Subject (023528 .. 023538, of 34107):
taking prayer and Bible reading out of school was a mistake taking prayer and Bible reading out of school was a mistake
Match 300 (1): Reference (014632 .. 014678, of 36359): Subject (023528 .. 023575, of 34107):
taking prayer and Bible reading out of school was a mistake and he wanted it reinstated in the Dover public schools 8 48 49 J Brown b Later Bonsell told Jeff Brown he wanted to be on the Board Curriculum Committee because he had concerns about the taking prayer and Bible reading out of school was a mistake which he wanted reinstated in the Dover public schools 8 48 49 J Brown Subsequently Bonsell told Jeff Brown he wanted to be on the Board Curriculum Committee because he had concerns about teaching evolution and he
Match 301 (1): Reference (014678 .. 014713, of 36359): Subject (023568 .. 023605, of 34107):
the teaching of evolution and he wanted to see some changes in that area 8 55 J Brown c Nilsen complained to Jeff Brown that each Board President had a new set of priorities and Bonsell he had concerns about teaching evolution and he wanted to see some changes in that area 8 55 J Brown Additionally Nilsen complained to Jeff Brown that each Board President had a new set of priorities and Bonsell
Match 302 (1): Reference (014697 .. 014718, of 36359): Subject (023589 .. 023607, of 34107):
Nilsen complained to Jeff Brown that each Board President had a new set of priorities and Bonsell had creationism as his priority Nilsen complained to Jeff Brown that each Board President had a new set of priorities and Bonsell s priority
Match 303 (1): Reference (014850 .. 014871, of 36359): Subject (023668 .. 023691, of 34107):
Bonsell not only wanted prayer in schools and creationism in science class he wanted to inject religion into the social studies curriculum Bonsell not only wanted prayer in schools and creationism taught in science class he also wanted to inject religion into the social studies curriculum
Match 304 (1): Reference (014873 .. 014886, of 36359): Subject (023697 .. 023709, of 34107):
told Baksa that he wanted the students to learn more about the Founding Fathers to Baksa that he wanted students to learn more about the Founding Fathers
Match 305 (1): Reference (014897 .. 014909, of 36359): Subject (023714 .. 023728, of 34107):
a book entitled Myth of Separation by David Barton 36 14 15 Baksa a book entitled Myth of Separation by David Barton 22 36 14 15 17 Baksa
Match 306 (1): Reference (015133 .. 015156, of 36359): Subject (033980 .. 034006, of 34107):
an email to one of the social studies teachers on October 19 2004 the day after the Board passed the resolution at issue in an email to one of the social studies teachers on October 19 2004 the day after the Board passed the resolution at issue Baksa said all kidding
Match 307 (1): Reference (015133 .. 015214, of 36359): Subject (033980 .. 034058, of 34107):
an email to one of the social studies teachers on October 19 2004 the day after the Board passed the resolution at issue in this case Baksa said all kidding aside be careful what you ask for I ve been given a copy of the Myth of Separation by David Barton to review from board members Social Studies curriculum is next year Feel free to borrow my copy to get an idea where the board is coming from 36 14 Baksa P91 an email to one of the social studies teachers on October 19 2004 the day after the Board passed the resolution at issue Baksa said all kidding aside be careful what you ask for I ve been given a copy of the Myth of Separation by David Barton to review from Board members Social Studies curriculum is next year Feel free to borrow my copy to get an idea where the board is coming from 36 14 Baksa P
Match 308 (1): Reference (015216 .. 015234, of 36359): Subject (023732 .. 023746, of 34107):
Fall 2003 Bonsell Confronted the Teachers About Evolution o 151 Beginning shortly after Baksa took a position with the Fall 2003 Bonsell Confronted Teachers About Evolution Shortly after Baksa took a position with the
Match 309 (1): Reference (015239 .. 015265, of 36359): Subject (023748 .. 023774, of 34107):
in the fall of 2002 he and Bonsell then Chair of the Board Curriculum Committee had discussions in which Bonsell expressed concern about the teaching of evolution in the fall of 2002 he and Bonsell then Chair of the Board Curriculum Committee had discussions in which Bonsell expressed concern about the teaching of evolution
Match 310 (1): Reference (015313 .. 015323, of 36359): Subject (023787 .. 023797, of 34107):
felt that Darwin was presented as a fact not a theory felt that Darwin was presented as a fact not a theory
Match 311 (1): Reference (015416 .. 015434, of 36359): Subject (023804 .. 023820, of 34107):
Baksa o 153 Prior to the fall of 2003 Baksa discussed Bonsell s concerns about evolution with the teachers Baksa Prior to the fall of 2003 Baksa discussed Bonsell s evolu tionary concerns with the teachers
Match 312 (1): Reference (015466 .. 015485, of 36359): Subject (023820 .. 023843, of 34107):
a problem with the teachers teaching the origin of life by which Bonsell meant how species change into other species teachers including Bonsell s problem with the teach ing of the origin of life by which Bonsell meant how species change into other species
Match 313 (1): Reference (015507 .. 015520, of 36359): Subject (023749 .. 023763, of 34107):
the fall of 2003 Bonsell then the head of the Board Curriculum Committee had the fall of 2002 he and Bonsell then Chair of the Board Curriculum Committee had
Match 314 (1): Reference (015622 .. 015633, of 36359): Subject (023878 .. 023889, of 34107):
Jennifer Miller the senior biology teacher acted as spokesperson for the teachers Jennifer Miller the senior biology teacher acted as spokesperson for the teachers
Match 315 (1): Reference (015666 .. 015710, of 36359): Subject (023916 .. 023958, of 34107):
to the students in opposition to what parents presented at home leaving students with the impression that somebody is lying 12 111 J Miller Miller explained that the teachers taught evolution as change over time with emphasis on origin of species not origin of life to students in opposition to what parents presented at home leaving students with the impression that somebody is lying 12 111 J Miller Miller explained that evolution is taught as change over time with emphasis upon origin of species not origin of life
Match 316 (1): Reference (015796 .. 015835, of 36359): Subject (023977 .. 024016, of 34107):
because the concept of common ancestry offends his personal religious belief that God created man and other species in the forms they now exist and that the earth is only thousands of years old 33 54 58 115 Bonsell o because the concept of common ancestry offends his personal religious belief that God created man and other species in the forms they now exist and that the earth is only thousands of years old 33 54 58 115 Bonsell Prior
Match 317 (1): Reference (015897 .. 015924, of 36359): Subject (024015 .. 024043, of 34107):
Bonsell o 158 Prior to the fall of 2003 no Dover administrator or board member had ever met with the biology teachers and questioned how they taught evolution Bonsell Prior to the fall of 2003 no Dover administrator or Board member had ever met with the biology teachers and questioned them as to how they taught evolution
Match 318 (1): Reference (015949 .. 015959, of 36359): Subject (024094 .. 024107, of 34107):
class that creationism was based on Bibles religion and Biblical writings a practice of explaining that creationism was based on Bibles religion and Biblical writings
Match 319 (1): Reference (015949 .. 015972, of 36359): Subject (024094 .. 024120, of 34107):
class that creationism was based on Bibles religion and Biblical writings and that it was illegal to discuss creationism in public school 36 83 a practice of explaining that creationism was based on Bibles religion and Biblical writings noting that it was illegal to discuss creation in public school 36 83
Match 320 (1): Reference (015990 .. 016001, of 36359): Subject (004477 .. 004485, of 34107):
a separate non scientific religious theory at the beginning of the evolution Fundamentalism s attack on the scientific theory of evolution
Match 321 (1): Reference (016008 .. 016035, of 36359): Subject (024147 .. 024180, of 34107):
stopped using helpful Discovery Channel videos as teaching aides 36 82 85 Linker testified that he changed his practice because the unusual meeting with board member Bonsell had stop using helpful Discovery Channel evolution videos as teaching aides 36 82 85 Linker Linker testified that he changed his practices in the classroom because the unusual meeting with Bonsell alerted him to a
Match 322 (1): Reference (016008 .. 016087, of 36359): Subject (024147 .. 024228, of 34107):
stopped using helpful Discovery Channel videos as teaching aides 36 82 85 Linker testified that he changed his practice because the unusual meeting with board member Bonsell had alerted him to a controversy surrounding how he taught evolution 36 84 85 o 161 Linker also testified that other biology teacher Jen Miller changed her practices of having the students create an evolution time line in the hallway which addressed how various species developed over millions of years 36 86 87 stop using helpful Discovery Channel evolution videos as teaching aides 36 82 85 Linker Linker testified that he changed his practices in the classroom because the unusual meeting with Bonsell alerted him to a controversy surrounding how he taught evolution 36 84 85 Linker Linker additionally testified that Jen Miller a senior biology teacher changed her practice of having the students create an evolution time line in the hallway which addressed how various species developed over millions of years 36 86 87
Match 323 (1): Reference (016098 .. 016111, of 36359): Subject (024295 .. 024309, of 34107):
Sometime before June 2004 Seth Cooper an attorney with the Discovery Institute contacted Buckingham some point before June 2004 Seth Cooper an attorney with the Discovery Institute contacted Buckingham
Match 324 (1): Reference (016130 .. 016139, of 36359): Subject (024310 .. 024320, of 34107):
and two subsequent calls between the Discovery Institute and Buckingham and two subsequent calls occurred between the Discovery Institute and Buckingham
Match 325 (1): Reference (016172 .. 016181, of 36359): Subject (024345 .. 024358, of 34107):
Buckingham and Cooper discussed the legalities of teaching intelligent design Buckingham and Cooper discussed the legality of teaching ID and gaps in Darwin s
Match 326 (1): Reference (016182 .. 016192, of 36359): Subject (024346 .. 024360, of 34107):
and the legalities of teaching gaps in Darwin s theory 29 and Cooper discussed the legality of teaching ID and gaps in Darwin s theory 29
Match 327 (1): Reference (016203 .. 016213, of 36359): Subject (024368 .. 024376, of 34107):
Discovery Institute Buckingham received a DVD a videotape and a book Discovery Institute forwarded Buckingham a DVD videotape and book
Match 328 (1): Reference (016228 .. 016246, of 36359): Subject (024380 .. 024398, of 34107):
to Nilsen to give to the science teachers 29 131 Buckingham 25 100 101 Nilsen 26 114 115 Baksa to Nilsen to give the science teachers 29 130 131 Buckingham 25 100 01 Nilsen 26 114 15 Baksa
Match 329 (1): Reference (016228 .. 016274, of 36359): Subject (024380 .. 024423, of 34107):
to Nilsen to give to the science teachers 29 131 Buckingham 25 100 101 Nilsen 26 114 115 Baksa o 164 Sometime late in the 2003 04 school year Baksa arranged for the science teachers to watch a video from the Discovery Institute entitled Icons of Evolution to Nilsen to give the science teachers 29 130 131 Buckingham 25 100 01 Nilsen 26 114 15 Baksa Late in the 2003 04 school year Baksa arranged for the science teachers to watch a video from the Discovery Institute entitled Icons of Evolution
Match 330 (1): Reference (016292 .. 016309, of 36359): Subject (024429 .. 024444, of 34107):
two lawyers from the Discovery Institute came and made a legal presentation to the Board in executive session two lawyers from the Discovery Institute made a legal presentation to the Board in executive session
Match 331 (1): Reference (016338 .. 016352, of 36359): Subject (024473 .. 024487, of 34107):
In June 2003 the Board approved funds for new science textbooks including a biology textbook In June 2003 the Board approved funds for new science textbooks including a biology textbook
Match 332 (1): Reference (016484 .. 016494, of 36359): Subject (024742 .. 024756, of 34107):
the Board approve the purchase of the 2002 edition of Biology the Board would approve the purchase of the 2002 edition of the textbook entitled Biology
Match 333 (1): Reference (016514 .. 016525, of 36359): Subject (024532 .. 024543, of 34107):
that as of June 2004 the Board was delaying approval of Biology that as of June 2004 the Board was delaying approval of Biology
Match 334 (1): Reference (016532 .. 016558, of 36359): Subject (024544 .. 024570, of 34107):
because of the book s treatment of evolution and the fact that it did not cover any alternatives to the theory of evolution 29 33 34 Buckingham because of the book s treatment of evolution and the fact that it did not cover any alternatives to the theory of evolution 29 33 34 Buckingham
Match 335 (1): Reference (016560 .. 016576, of 36359): Subject (024572 .. 024588, of 34107):
June 2004 Board Meetings Buckingham and Other Board Members Spoke Out in Favor of Teaching Creationism o June 2004 Board Meetings Buckingham and Other Board Members Spoke in Favor of Teaching Creationism Plaintiffs introduced
Match 336 (1): Reference (016592 .. 016627, of 36359): Subject (024587 .. 024627, of 34107):
plaintiffs introduced evidence that at public board meetings held on June 7 and 14 2004 members of the Board spoke openly in favor of teaching creationism and disparaged the theory of evolution on religious grounds o Plaintiffs introduced evidence that at public school board meetings held on June 7 2004 and June 14 2004 members of the Board spoke openly in favor of teaching creationism and disparaged the theory of evolution on religious grounds On these important
Match 337 (1): Reference (016592 .. 016635, of 36359): Subject (024587 .. 024635, of 34107):
plaintiffs introduced evidence that at public board meetings held on June 7 and 14 2004 members of the Board spoke openly in favor of teaching creationism and disparaged the theory of evolution on religious grounds o 171 On these important points the plaintiffs introduced Plaintiffs introduced evidence that at public school board meetings held on June 7 2004 and June 14 2004 members of the Board spoke openly in favor of teaching creationism and disparaged the theory of evolution on religious grounds On these important points Plaintiffs introduced the testimony of Plaintiffs Fred
Match 338 (1): Reference (016592 .. 016675, of 36359): Subject (024587 .. 024670, of 34107):
plaintiffs introduced evidence that at public board meetings held on June 7 and 14 2004 members of the Board spoke openly in favor of teaching creationism and disparaged the theory of evolution on religious grounds o 171 On these important points the plaintiffs introduced the testimony of plaintiffs Fred and Barrie Callahan Bryan and Christy Rehm Beth Eveland former school board members Casey and Jeff Brown and William Buckingham teachers Bertha Spahr and Jennifer Miller and newspaper reporters Heidi Bernhard Bubb and Joseph Maldonado Plaintiffs introduced evidence that at public school board meetings held on June 7 2004 and June 14 2004 members of the Board spoke openly in favor of teaching creationism and disparaged the theory of evolution on religious grounds On these important points Plaintiffs introduced the testimony of Plaintiffs Fred and Barrie Callahan Bryan and Christy Rehm Beth Eveland former school Board members Casey and Jeff Brown and William Buckingham teachers Bertha Spahr and Jennifer Miller and newspaper reporters Heidi Bernhard Bubb and Joseph Maldonado
Match 339 (1): Reference (016676 .. 016689, of 36359): Subject (024678 .. 024692, of 34107):
With the exception of Buckingham the testimony of these witnesses was credible and convincing with the exception of Buckingham the testimony of these witnesses was both credible and convincing
Match 340 (1): Reference (016877 .. 016899, of 36359): Subject (024705 .. 024727, of 34107):
the board meeting on June 7 2004 a Approval of several science textbooks appeared on the agenda for the meeting but not approval the June 7 2004 Board meeting First the approval of several science textbooks appeared on the agenda for the meeting but not approval
Match 341 (1): Reference (016909 .. 016924, of 36359): Subject (024738 .. 024756, of 34107):
Barrie Callahan asked whether the Board would approve the purchase of the 2002 edition of Biology Barrie Callahan asked whether the Board would approve the purchase of the 2002 edition of the textbook entitled Biology
Match 342 (1): Reference (016929 .. 016985, of 36359): Subject (024757 .. 024814, of 34107):
Buckingham told Callahan that the book was laced with Darwinism and he spoke in favor of purchasing a textbook that included a balance of creationism and evolution P46 P790 35 76 78 Baksa 24 45 46 Nilsen 3 135 36 B Callahan 4 51 52 B Rehm 6 62 63 C Rehm 7 25 26 C Brown Buckingham told Callahan that the book was laced with Darwinism and spoke in favor of purchasing a textbook that included a balance of creationism and evolution P 46 P 790 35 76 78 Baksa 24 45 46 Nilsen 3 135 36 B Callahan 4 51 52 B Rehm 6 62 63 C Rehm 7 25 26 C Brown
Match 343 (1): Reference (016994 .. 017016, of 36359): Subject (024836 .. 024858, of 34107):
Buckingham c Buckingham said the Board Curriculum Committee would look for a book that presented a balance between creationism and evolution P45 P805 Buckingham said that the Board Curriculum Committee would look for a book that presented a balance between creationism and evolution P 45 P
Match 344 (1): Reference (016995 .. 017020, of 36359): Subject (024835 .. 024865, of 34107):
c Buckingham said the Board Curriculum Committee would look for a book that presented a balance between creationism and evolution P45 P805 30 96 Bernhard Bubb Second Buckingham said that the Board Curriculum Committee would look for a book that presented a balance between creationism and evolution P 45 P 805 Trial Tr vol 30 Bernhard Bubb
Match 345 (1): Reference (017027 .. 017143, of 36359): Subject (024886 .. 025011, of 34107):
d Bonsell said that there were only two theories that could possibly be taught creationism and evolution and as long as both were taught as theories there would be no problems for the district P46 P790 6 65 C Rehm e Buckingham spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P47 P791 8 60 61 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 3 137 138 B Callahan 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 60 66 Maldonado f Wenrich spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P47 P791 8 60 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 66 Maldonado Third Bonsell said that there were only two theories that could possibly be taught creationism and evolution and as long as both were taught as theories there would be no problems for the District P 46 P 790 6 65 C Rehm Fourth Buckingham spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P 47 P 791 8 60 61 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 3 137 38 B Callahan 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 60 66 Maldonado Fifth both Wenrich and Bonsell spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P 47 P 791 8 60 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 66 Maldonado
Match 346 (1): Reference (017145 .. 017167, of 36359): Subject (024976 .. 025000, of 34107):
Bonsell spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P47 P791 8 60 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 3 Bonsell spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P 47 P 791 8 60 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 30
Match 347 (1): Reference (017146 .. 017184, of 36359): Subject (024930 .. 024972, of 34107):
spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P47 P791 8 60 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 3 137 38 B Callahan 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 66 Maldonado h spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P 47 P 791 8 60 61 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 3 137 38 B Callahan 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 60 66 Maldonado Fifth
Match 348 (1): Reference (017184 .. 017201, of 36359): Subject (025017 .. 025034, of 34107):
h Superintendent Nilsen said that the district was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories Sixth Superintendent Nilsen said that the District was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories
Match 349 (1): Reference (017184 .. 017215, of 36359): Subject (025017 .. 025048, of 34107):
h Superintendent Nilsen said that the district was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories P44 He never challenged the accuracy of that quotation 25 119 20 Nilsen i Sixth Superintendent Nilsen said that the District was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories and never challenged the accuracy of that quotation 25 119 20 Nilsen Seventh Buckingham
Match 350 (1): Reference (017184 .. 017216, of 36359): Subject (025017 .. 025048, of 34107):
h Superintendent Nilsen said that the district was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories P44 He never challenged the accuracy of that quotation 25 119 20 Nilsen i Buckingham Sixth Superintendent Nilsen said that the District was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories and never challenged the accuracy of that quotation 25 119 20 Nilsen Seventh Buckingham
Match 351 (1): Reference (017219 .. 017250, of 36359): Subject (025056 .. 025092, of 34107):
separation of church and state is a myth and not something he supports P44 P804 P47 P791 3 141 42 B Callahan 7 32 33 C Brown 31 66 67 Maldonado Buckingham separation of church and state is a myth and not something that he supports P 44 P 804 P 47 P 791 3 141 42 B Callahan 7 32 33 C Brown 31 66 67 Maldonado Buckingham
Match 352 (1): Reference (017261 .. 017287, of 36359): Subject (025092 .. 025121, of 34107):
Buckingham said It is inexcusable to have a book that says man descended from apes with nothing to counterbalance it P44 P804 30 77 78 Bernhard Bubb Buckingham also said It is inexcusable to have a book that says man descended from apes with nothing to counterbalance it P 44 P 804 30 77 78 Bernhard Bubb
Match 353 (1): Reference (017294 .. 017323, of 36359): Subject (025128 .. 025161, of 34107):
This country wasn t founded on Muslim beliefs or evolution This country was founded on Christianity and our students should be taught as such P46 P790 31 63 Maldonado o This country wasn t founded on Muslim beliefs or evolution This country was founded on Christianity and our students should be taught as such P 46 P 790 31 63 Maldonado We will now
Match 354 (1): Reference (017339 .. 017350, of 36359): Subject (025177 .. 025188, of 34107):
subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of
Match 355 (1): Reference (017339 .. 017371, of 36359): Subject (025177 .. 025209, of 34107):
subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of this meeting but members of the public made comments and the Board continued to debate the subject of the biology textbook subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of the meeting but members of the public made comments and the Board continued to debate the subject of the biology textbook
Match 356 (1): Reference (017339 .. 017376, of 36359): Subject (025177 .. 025214, of 34107):
subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of this meeting but members of the public made comments and the Board continued to debate the subject of the biology textbook b Buckingham s wife Charlotte subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of the meeting but members of the public made comments and the Board continued to debate the subject of the biology textbook Second Buckingham s wife Charlotte
Match 357 (1): Reference (017397 .. 017486, of 36359): Subject (025234 .. 025325, of 34107):
evolution teaches nothing but lies quoted from Genesis asked how can we allow anything else to be taught in our schools recited gospel verses telling people to become born again Christians and stated that evolution violated the teachings of the Bible P53 P793 4 55 56 B Rehm 6 71 C Rehm 7 34 35 C Brown 8 104 05 F Callahan 8 63 J Brown 30 107 08 Bernhard Bubb 31 76 77 Maldonado 33 37 43 Bonsell 29 82 83 Buckingham 12 125 J Miller 13 84 Spahr evolution teaches nothing but lies quoted from Genesis asked how can we allow anything else to be taught in our schools recited gospel verses telling people to become born again Christians and stated that evolution violated the teachings of the Bible P 53 P 793 4 55 56 B Rehm 6 71 C Rehm 7 34 35 C Brown 8 104 05 F Callahan 8 63 J Brown 30 107 08 Bernhard Bubb 31 76 77 Maldonado 33 37 43 Bonsell 29 82 83 Buckingham 12 125 J Miller 13 84 Spahr
Match 358 (1): Reference (017488 .. 017514, of 36359): Subject (025327 .. 025357, of 34107):
her deposition Charlotte Buckingham admitted that she made a speech at the June 14 board meeting arguing that creationism as set forth in Genesis should be taught her deposition Charlotte Buckingham admitted that she made a speech at the June 14 2004 Board meeting in which she argued that creationism as set forth in Genesis should be taught
Match 359 (1): Reference (017516 .. 017539, of 36359): Subject (025359 .. 025379, of 34107):
Dover High School and that she read quotations from scripture as part of her speech C Buckingham Dep 4 15 05 at 19 22 Dover High School and that she read quotations from scripture as part of her speech C Buckingham Dep at 19 22
Match 360 (1): Reference (017547 .. 017571, of 36359): Subject (025392 .. 025417, of 34107):
board members William Buckingham and Geesey said amen 7 35 C Brown d William Buckingham stood by his opposition to the 2002 edition of Biology Board members Buckingham and Geesey said amen 7 35 C Brown Third Buckingham stood by his opposition to the 2002 edition of the textbook entitled Biology
Match 361 (1): Reference (017578 .. 017601, of 36359): Subject (025416 .. 025440, of 34107):
e Bonsell and Wenrich said that they agreed with William Buckingham that creationism should be taught to balance evolution P806 P54 f William Buckingham entitled Biology Fourth Bonsell and Wenrich said they agreed with Buckingham that creationism should be taught to balance evolution P 806 P 54 Fifth Buckingham
Match 362 (1): Reference (017603 .. 017616, of 36359): Subject (025451 .. 025464, of 34107):
Nowhere in the Constitution does it call for a separation of church and state Nowhere in the Constitution does it call for a separation of church and state
Match 363 (1): Reference (017654 .. 017670, of 36359): Subject (025474 .. 025493, of 34107):
Buckingham said I challenge you the audience to trace your roots to the monkey you came from Buckingham concedes that he said I challenge you the audience to trace your roots to the monkey you came from
Match 364 (1): Reference (017688 .. 017702, of 36359): Subject (025495 .. 025509, of 34107):
said that while growing up his generation read from the Bible and prayed during school said that while growing up his generation read from the Bible and prayed during school
Match 365 (1): Reference (017711 .. 017722, of 36359): Subject (025512 .. 025523, of 34107):
said liberals in black robes were taking away the rights of Christians said liberals in black robes were taking away the rights of Christians
Match 366 (1): Reference (017739 .. 017761, of 36359): Subject (025526 .. 025548, of 34107):
said words to the effect of 2 000 years ago someone died on a cross Can t someone take a stand for him said words to the effect of 2 000 years ago someone died on a cross Can t someone take a stand for him
Match 367 (1): Reference (017798 .. 017815, of 36359): Subject (025590 .. 025607, of 34107):
Rehm 6 96 Eveland 7 26 27 C Brown 8 63 J Brown 8 105 06 F Callahan Rehm 6 96 Eveland 7 26 27 C Brown 8 63 J Brown 8 105 06 F Callahan
Match 368 (1): Reference (017835 .. 017858, of 36359): Subject (025610 .. 025632, of 34107):
Buckingham Bonsell and other witnesses for defendants denied the reports in the news media and contradicted the great weight of the evidence about what Buckingham Bonsell and other defense witnesses denied the reports in the news media and contradicted the great weight of the evidence about what
Match 369 (1): Reference (017946 .. 017963, of 36359): Subject (025690 .. 025706, of 34107):
to discuss P132 a list of Buckingham s concerns about the textbook Biology 12 114 15 J Miller to discuss a list of Buckingham s concerns about the textbook Biology 12 114 15 J Miller
Match 370 (1): Reference (018069 .. 018086, of 36359): Subject (025728 .. 025745, of 34107):
the reference to a species of finch known as Darwin s finch simply because it refers to Darwin the reference to a species of finch known as Darwin s finch simply because it referred to Darwin
Match 371 (1): Reference (018093 .. 018124, of 36359): Subject (025750 .. 025781, of 34107):
the textbook because it did not give balanced presentation by which he meant that it did not include the theory of creationism with God as creator of all life 7 48 o the textbook did not give balanced presentation by which he meant that it did not include the theory of creationism with God as creator of all life 7 45 48 C Brown
Match 372 (1): Reference (018126 .. 018136, of 36359): Subject (026151 .. 026161, of 34107):
At the June meeting Bertha Spahr asked Buckingham where he had At the June 2004 meeting Spahr asked Buckingham where he had
Match 373 (1): Reference (018147 .. 018160, of 36359): Subject (026136 .. 026149, of 34107):
destroyed in 2002 by Larry Reeser the head of buildings and grounds for the destroyed in 2002 by Larry Reeser the head of buildings and grounds for the
Match 374 (1): Reference (018175 .. 018188, of 36359): Subject (026172 .. 026190, of 34107):
to Jennifer Miller Buckingham responded I gleefully watched it burn 12 118 J Miller torn down and incinerated Jen Miller testified that Buckingham responded I gleefully watched it burn 12 118 J Miller
Match 375 (1): Reference (018204 .. 018223, of 36359): Subject (026191 .. 026212, of 34107):
Buckingham disliked the mural because he thought it advocated the theory of evolution particularly common ancestry 26 120 Baksa o Buckingham disliked the mural because he thought it advocated the theory of evolution particularly common ancestry 26 120 Baksa Burning the evolutionary
Match 376 (1): Reference (018231 .. 018257, of 36359): Subject (025789 .. 025813, of 34107):
Buckingham s concern that the teachers were teaching what he referred to as origins of life which for him apparently includes origin of species and common ancestry Buckingham s concern that the teachers were teaching what he referred to as origins of life apparently including the origin of species and common ancestry
Match 377 (1): Reference (018355 .. 018367, of 36359): Subject (025848 .. 025860, of 34107):
a survey of biology books used in private religious schools in York County a survey of biology books used in private religious schools in York County
Match 378 (1): Reference (018432 .. 018443, of 36359): Subject (025861 .. 025872, of 34107):
a product profile of a biology textbook used at Bob Jones University a product profile of a biology textbook used at Bob Jones University
Match 379 (1): Reference (018529 .. 018555, of 36359): Subject (025907 .. 025933, of 34107):
explains the difference between Young Earth Creationism Creation Science Progressive Creationism Old Earth Creation Evolutionary Creation Theistic Creation Deistic Evolution Theistic Evolution and Dysteleological Evolution Atheistic Evolution explains the difference between Young Earth Creationism Creation Science Progressive Creationism Old Earth Creation Evolutionary Creation Theistic Creation Deistic Evolution Theistic Evolution and Dysteleological Evolution Atheistic Evolution
Match 380 (1): Reference (018567 .. 018581, of 36359): Subject (025940 .. 025958, of 34107):
under Progressive Creation Old Earth Creation is Intelligent Design Movement Phillip Johnson Michael Behe P149 under the Progressive Creation Old Earth Creation is that of the Intelligent Design Movement Phillip Johnson Michael Behe P
Match 381 (1): Reference (018753 .. 018785, of 36359): Subject (026031 .. 026059, of 34107):
teachers had already watched the video Icons of Evolution that Buckingham received from the Discovery Institute but at Buckingham s insistence they agreed to review it again and consider using in class any teachers had already watched the video Icons of Evolution from the Discovery Institute at Buckingham s insistence they agreed to review it again and consider using in class any
Match 382 (1): Reference (018790 .. 018810, of 36359): Subject (026061 .. 026081, of 34107):
that aligned with their curriculum 26 122 Baksa Baksa believed that the teachers had already determined that there were no parts that aligned with their curriculum 26 122 Baksa Although Baksa believed that the teachers had already determined there were no parts
Match 383 (1): Reference (018856 .. 018875, of 36359): Subject (026222 .. 026241, of 34107):
demanded that the teachers agree that there would never again be a mural depicting evolution in any of the classrooms demanded that the teachers agree that there would never again be a mural depicting evolution in any of the classrooms
Match 384 (1): Reference (018887 .. 018901, of 36359): Subject (026246 .. 026263, of 34107):
would agree to support the purchase of the biology textbook the students needed 36 57 would agree to support the purchase of the biology textbook in need by the students 36 56 57
Match 385 (1): Reference (018906 .. 018916, of 36359): Subject (026269 .. 026282, of 34107):
Baksa there was some mention of the words intelligent design at s testimony revealed that there was some mention of the words intelligent design at
Match 386 (1): Reference (018970 .. 018981, of 36359): Subject (026295 .. 026303, of 34107):
to the best of his knowledge no one else at the meeting to the best of his knowledge at the time
Match 387 (1): Reference (019009 .. 019022, of 36359): Subject (026314 .. 026328, of 34107):
word creationism used by Buckingham at a board meeting earlier that month 35 98 word creationism used by Buckingham at a Board meeting earlier that month 35 96 98
Match 388 (1): Reference (019222 .. 019242, of 36359): Subject (021409 .. 021429, of 34107):
4Two exhibit numbers separated by a slash indicates that Plaintiffs introduced different formats of the same article under different exhibit numbers 10Two exhibit numbers separated by a slash indicates that Plaintiffs introduced different formats of the same article under different exhibit numbers
Match 389 (1): Reference (019776 .. 019787, of 36359): Subject (026374 .. 026382, of 34107):
July 2004 Buckingham Contacted Rchard Thompson of the Thomas More Law Center July 2004 Buckingham contacted the Thomas More Law Center
Match 390 (1): Reference (019800 .. 019811, of 36359): Subject (026370 .. 026384, of 34107):
Sometime before late July 2004 Buckingham contacted Thomas More Law Center TMLC some point before late July 2004 Buckingham contacted the Thomas More Law Center hereinafter TMLC
Match 391 (1): Reference (019908 .. 019936, of 36359): Subject (026425 .. 026455, of 34107):
Buckingham and the Board first learned of the creationist textbook Of Pandas and People from Richard Thompson sometime before late July 2004 29 107 08 30 10 12 Buckingham Buckingham and the Board first learned of the creationist textbook Pandas from Richard Thompson at some point before late July 2004 29 107 08 Buckingham 30 10 12 15 16 Buckingham
Match 392 (1): Reference (019953 .. 019984, of 36359): Subject (016053 .. 016084, of 34107):
Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc
Match 393 (1): Reference (020059 .. 020073, of 36359): Subject (026465 .. 026482, of 34107):
In July 2004 the teachers discovered that there was a 2004 edition of Biology available In July 2004 after the teachers discovered that there was a 2004 edition of the textbook Biology available
Match 394 (1): Reference (020114 .. 020123, of 36359): Subject (026517 .. 026526, of 34107):
Spahr Miller and Baksa met to review the 2004 edition Spahr Miller and Baksa met to review the 2004 edition
Match 395 (1): Reference (020169 .. 020182, of 36359): Subject (026554 .. 026568, of 34107):
August 2004 Buckingham and Others Tried to Prevent Purchase of the Standard Biology Textbook August 2004 Buckingham and Other Board Members Tried to Prevent Purchase of Standard Biology Textbook
Match 396 (1): Reference (020229 .. 020243, of 36359): Subject (026597 .. 026610, of 34107):
meeting Casey Brown received a call from Assistant Superintendent Baksa who told her that Buckingham meeting Casey Brown received a telephone call from Baksa who told her that Buckingham
Match 397 (1): Reference (020253 .. 020272, of 36359): Subject (026608 .. 026631, of 34107):
he recommended the school district purchase as a supplemental textbook 7 52 53 C Brown 8 64 J Brown o her that Buckingham recommended that the District purchase Pandas as a supplemental textbook 7 52 53 C Brown 8 64 J Brown Jeff Brown
Match 398 (1): Reference (020253 .. 020286, of 36359): Subject (026608 .. 026643, of 34107):
he recommended the school district purchase as a supplemental textbook 7 52 53 C Brown 8 64 J Brown o 199 Jeff Brown went to Harkins home to pick up a copy of Pandas her that Buckingham recommended that the District purchase Pandas as a supplemental textbook 7 52 53 C Brown 8 64 J Brown Jeff Brown then went to Harkins home to pick up a copy of Pandas
Match 399 (1): Reference (020290 .. 020302, of 36359): Subject (026648 .. 026660, of 34107):
told him that she wanted the school district to purchase the book 8 told him that she wanted the school District to purchase the book 8
Match 400 (1): Reference (020425 .. 020467, of 36359): Subject (026670 .. 026709, of 34107):
meeting four days later Buckingham opposed the purchase of Biology which was recommended by the faculty and administration unless the Board also approved the purchase of Pandas as a companion text Only eight members of the Board were present on August 2 2004 meeting Buckingham opposed the purchase of Biology which was recommended by the faculty and administration unless the Board also approved the purchase of Pandas as a companion text Only eight members of the Board were present on August 2 2004
Match 401 (1): Reference (020472 .. 020497, of 36359): Subject (026710 .. 026733, of 34107):
and the initial vote to approve the purchase of Pandas failed to pass on a four to four vote with Buckingham Harkins Geesey and Yingling voting and the initial vote to approve the purchase of Pandas failed on a four to four vote with Buckingham Harkins Geesey and Yingling voting
Match 402 (1): Reference (020499 .. 020508, of 36359): Subject (026735 .. 026744, of 34107):
it 8 68 J Brown 29 105 06 Buckingham P67 it 8 68 J Brown 29 105 06 Buckingham P
Match 403 (1): Reference (020511 .. 020544, of 36359): Subject (026747 .. 026779, of 34107):
Buckingham stated that he had five votes in favor of purchasing Pandas and that if the Board approved the purchase of Pandas he would release his votes to also approve the purchase of Biology Buckingham stated that he had five votes in favor of purchasing Pandas and if the Board approved the purchase of Pandas he would release his votes to also approve the purchase of Biology
Match 404 (1): Reference (020550 .. 020570, of 36359): Subject (026780 .. 026803, of 34107):
Yingling then changed her vote and the motion to approve the purchase of Biology passed P67 8 69 At trial Buckingham Yingling changed her vote and the motion to approve the purchase of Biology passed P 67 8 68 69 J Brown At trial Buckingham
Match 405 (1): Reference (020572 .. 020595, of 36359): Subject (026805 .. 026829, of 34107):
that at the meeting he said if he didn t get his book the district would not get the biology book 29 106 Buckingham that at the meeting he specifically said if he didn t get his book the district would not get the biology book 29 106 Buckingham
Match 406 (1): Reference (020640 .. 020652, of 36359): Subject (026839 .. 026852, of 34107):
On August 26 2004 the Board Solicitor sent an email to Superintendent Nilsen On August 26 2004 Board Solicitor Stephen S Russell sent an email to Nilsen
Match 407 (1): Reference (020675 .. 020685, of 36359): Subject (026865 .. 026877, of 34107):
Center They refer to the creationism issue as intelligent design They t hey refer to the creationism issue as intelligent design P 70 The
Match 408 (1): Reference (020685 .. 020740, of 36359): Subject (026884 .. 026940, of 34107):
They have background knowledge and have talked to school boards in West Virginia and Michigan about possible litigation However nothing has come about in either state This suggests to me that no one is adopting the textbook because if they were one can safely assume there would have been a legal challenge by someone somewhere I They TMLC have background knowledge and have talked to school boards in West Virginia and Michigan about possible litigation However nothing has come about in either state This suggests to me that no one is adopting the textbook because if they were one can safely assume there would have been a legal challenge by someone somewhere I
Match 409 (1): Reference (020756 .. 020910, of 36359): Subject (026940 .. 027094, of 34107):
I guess my main concern at the moment is that even if use of the text is purely voluntary this may still make it very difficult to win a case I say this because one of the common themes in some of the US Supreme Court decision especially dealing with silent meditation is that even though something is voluntary it still causes a problem because the practice whatever it may be was initiated for religious reasons One of the best examples comes out of the silent meditation cases in Alabama which the court struck down because the record showed that the statute in question was enacted for religious reasons My concern for Dover is that in the last several years there has been a lot of discussion news print etc for putting religion back in the schools In my mind this would add weight to a lawsuit seeking to enjoin whatever the practice might be I guess my main concern at the moment is that even if use of the text is purely voluntary this may still make it very difficult to win a case I say this because one of the common themes in some of the US Supreme Court decisions especially dealing with silent meditation is that even though something is voluntary it still causes a problem because the practice whatever it may be was initiated for religious reasons One of the best examples comes out of the silent meditation cases in Alabama which the court struck down because the record showed that the statute in question was enacted for religious reasons My concern for Dover is that in the last several years there has been a lot of discussion news print etc for putting religion back in the schools In my mind this would add weight to a lawsuit seeking to enjoin whatever the practice might be
Match 410 (1): Reference (020912 .. 020942, of 36359): Subject (027096 .. 027125, of 34107):
emphasis added o 204 Nilsen shared this email with everyone present at the Board Curriculum Committee meeting on August 30 2004 including Buckingham Bonsell and Harkins 25 135 36 Nilsen o emphasis added Nilsen subsequently shared this email with everyone present at the Board Curriculum Committee meeting on August 30 2004 including Buckingham Bonsell and Harkins 25 135 36 Nilsen Additionally
Match 411 (1): Reference (020947 .. 020977, of 36359): Subject (027126 .. 027160, of 34107):
both admitted that they knew the email referred to the news reports of the June 2004 board meetings 25 135 36 138 39 Nilsen 35 105 06 111 12 Baksa o both Nilsen and Baksa admitted that they knew the email referred to the news reports of the June 2004 meetings 25 135 36 138 39 Nilsen 35 105 06 111 12 Baksa There is no
Match 412 (1): Reference (020997 .. 021012, of 36359): Subject (027200 .. 027213, of 34107):
August 30 2004 The Board Curriculum Committee Forced Pandas on the Teachers as a Reference Text August 30 2004 Board Curriculum Committee Forced Pandas on the Teachers as Reference Text
Match 413 (1): Reference (021024 .. 021034, of 36359): Subject (027223 .. 027233, of 34107):
with Spahr Miller Nilsen Baksa Bonsell Buckingham Harkins and Casey Brown with Spahr Miller Nilsen Baksa Bonsell Buckingham Harkins and Casey Brown
Match 414 (1): Reference (021049 .. 021071, of 36359): Subject (027241 .. 027262, of 34107):
Pandas and People and how it would be used in the classroom 12 134 J Miller Spahr expressed concern that the textbook taught Pandas and how it would be used in the classroom 12 134 J Miller Although Spahr expressed concern that the textbook taught
Match 415 (1): Reference (021085 .. 021103, of 36359): Subject (027269 .. 027288, of 34107):
Buckingham wanted Pandas used in the classroom as a comparison text side by side with the standard biology textbook Buckingham wanted Pandas to be used in the classroom as a comparison text side by side the standard biology textbook
Match 416 (1): Reference (021129 .. 021142, of 36359): Subject (027311 .. 027324, of 34107):
teachers agreed that Pandas could be placed in the classroom as a reference text they agreed that Pandas could be placed in the classroom as a reference text
Match 417 (1): Reference (021152 .. 021168, of 36359): Subject (027369 .. 027389, of 34107):
that if they compromised with the Board maybe this will go away again 12 136 J Miller that if the teachers compromised with the Board maybe this will go away again 35 120 Baksa 12 136 J Miller
Match 418 (1): Reference (021222 .. 021244, of 36359): Subject (027341 .. 027360, of 34107):
Baksa testified that no one could construe the teachers as having supported Pandas in any way either as a reference text or otherwise Baksa testified that no one could construe the teachers as having supported Pandas in any way reference text or otherwise
Match 419 (1): Reference (021271 .. 021284, of 36359): Subject (027444 .. 027457, of 34107):
directed his secretary to go to the webpage from the Institute for Creation Research directing his secretary to go to the webpage for the Institute for Creation Research
Match 420 (1): Reference (021296 .. 021310, of 36359): Subject (027467 .. 027481, of 34107):
webpage states that Pandas contains interpretations of classic evidences in harmony with the creation model webpage states that Pandas contains interpretations of classic evidences in harmony with the creation model
Match 421 (1): Reference (021333 .. 021352, of 36359): Subject (027499 .. 027521, of 34107):
35 115 Baksa Baksa then contradicted this testimony on re direct and stated that he had never read the webpage 35 114 15 Baksa The fact that Baksa contradicted this testimony on re direct and stated that he had never read the webpage
Match 422 (1): Reference (021408 .. 021429, of 36359): Subject (027553 .. 027577, of 34107):
that Superintendent Nilsen had accepted a donation of 60 copies of Pandas P78 at 9 There is no evidence that Bonsell or that Nilsen had accepted a donation of 60 copies of the text Pandas P 78 at 9 There is no evidence that Bonsell Buckingham or
Match 423 (1): Reference (021408 .. 021432, of 36359): Subject (027553 .. 027578, of 34107):
that Superintendent Nilsen had accepted a donation of 60 copies of Pandas P78 at 9 There is no evidence that Bonsell or Buckingham or anyone that Nilsen had accepted a donation of 60 copies of the text Pandas P 78 at 9 There is no evidence that Bonsell Buckingham or any
Match 424 (1): Reference (021521 .. 021533, of 36359): Subject (027682 .. 027696, of 34107):
Order so that plaintiffs could decide whether to seek a temporary restraining order order of this Court so Plaintiffs could decide whether to seek a temporary restraining order
Match 425 (1): Reference (021556 .. 021587, of 36359): Subject (027703 .. 027736, of 34107):
Bonsell Neither Buckingham nor Bonsell provided any information about Buckingham s involvement in the donation or about a collection he took at his church 30 50 56 Buckingham 33 31 35 Bonsell on this point neither Buckingham nor Bonsell provided any information about Buckingham s involvement in the donation or about a collection he took at his church 30 50 56 Buckingham 33 31 35 Bonsell
Match 426 (1): Reference (021592 .. 021613, of 36359): Subject (027739 .. 027761, of 34107):
Buckingham made a plea for donations to purchase Pandas at his church the Harmony Grove Community Church on a Sunday before services Buckingham actually made a plea for donations to purchase Pandas at his church the Harmony Grove Community Church on a Sunday before services
Match 427 (1): Reference (021636 .. 021648, of 36359): Subject (027794 .. 027810, of 34107):
to Donald Bonsell drawn on Buckingham s account jointly held with his wife to Donald Bonsell Alan Bonsell s father drawn on Buckingham s account jointly held with his wife
Match 428 (1): Reference (021738 .. 021748, of 36359): Subject (027857 .. 027866, of 34107):
discovered P144 a catalogue from the company that sold the books discovered a catalogue from the company that sold the books
Match 429 (1): Reference (021754 .. 021766, of 36359): Subject (027867 .. 027883, of 34107):
lists Pandas under Creation Science 13 94 95 Spahr P144 at 29 o listing Pandas under Creation Science 13 94 5 Spahr P 144 at 29 When we were moved
Match 430 (1): Reference (021769 .. 021825, of 36359): Subject (027895 .. 027951, of 34107):
testified that his father served as the conduit for the funds from Buckingham s church because He agreed to he said that he would take it I guess off the table or whatever because of seeing what was going on and with Mrs Callahan complaining at the Board meeting not using funds or whatever 33 129 Bonsell testified that his father served as the conduit for the funds from Buckingham s church because He agreed to he said that he would take it I guess off the table or whatever because of seeing what was going on and with Mrs Callahan complaining at the Board meetings not using funds or whatever 33 129 Bonsell
Match 431 (1): Reference (021842 .. 021854, of 36359): Subject (027631 .. 027646, of 34107):
Buckingham and Bonsell tried to hide the source of the donations because they Buckingham and Bonsell tried to hide the source of the donations because it showed at the
Match 432 (1): Reference (021867 .. 021882, of 36359): Subject (027650 .. 027666, of 34107):
extraordinary measures to ensure that students received a creationist alternative to Darwin s theory of evolution extraordinary measures taken to ensure that students received a creationist alternative to Darwin s theory of evoluti
Match 433 (1): Reference (021917 .. 021935, of 36359): Subject (028065 .. 028085, of 34107):
sought to conceal their blatantly religious purpose P October 7 2004 The Board Curriculum Committee Drafted the Curriculum Change sought to conceal the blatantly religious purpose behind the ID Policy m October 7 2004 Board Curriculum Committee Drafted Curriculum Change
Match 434 (1): Reference (021944 .. 021980, of 36359): Subject (028086 .. 028121, of 34107):
In September 2004 acting on the instructions of the Board Baksa prepared a change to the biology curriculum which stated Students will be made aware of gaps in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution In September 2004 acting on instructions of the Board Baksa prepared a change to the biology curriculum which stated Students will be made aware of gaps in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution
Match 435 (1): Reference (022067 .. 022076, of 36359): Subject (028169 .. 028182, of 34107):
Board Curriculum Committee met to discuss changing the biology curriculum Board Curriculum Committee met on October 7 2004 to discuss changing the biology curriculum
Match 436 (1): Reference (022127 .. 022139, of 36359): Subject (028214 .. 028228, of 34107):
various positions regarding the proposed curriculum change 35 125 Baksa 29 113 Buckingham various positions regarding the proposed curriculum change P 81 35 125 Baksa 29 113 Buckingham
Match 437 (1): Reference (022174 .. 022198, of 36359): Subject (000057 .. 000081, of 34107):
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design
Match 438 (1): Reference (022174 .. 022220, of 36359): Subject (028245 .. 028292, of 34107):
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design P82 35 125 Baksa The Board Curriculum Committee s proposed change also called for Pandas to be cited as a reference text Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design P 82 35 125 Baksa The Board Curriculum Committee s proposed change also called for Pandas to be cited as a reference text
Match 439 (1): Reference (022311 .. 022335, of 36359): Subject (028306 .. 028332, of 34107):
the change proposed by administration and accepted by the science faculty were circulated to the full Board by memoranda dated October 13 2004 P84A P84B the change proposed by the administration and accepted by the science faculty were circulated to the full Board by memoranda dated October 13 2004 P 84A P
Match 440 (1): Reference (022348 .. 022400, of 36359): Subject (028342 .. 028394, of 34107):
On October 18 2004 the Board passed by a 6 3 vote a resolution that amended the biology curriculum as follows Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design Note Origins of Life is not taught On October 18 2004 the Board passed by a 6 3 vote a resolution that amended the biology curriculum as follows Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design Note Origins of Life is not taught
Match 441 (1): Reference (022407 .. 022434, of 36359): Subject (028402 .. 028431, of 34107):
this subject to be covered in lecture format with Of Pandas and People as a reference book 7 89 90 C Brown P88 P209 at 1646 P84C o this subject is to be covered in lecture form with Pandas to be a reference book 7 89 90 C Brown P 88 P 209 at 1646 P 84C Board
Match 442 (1): Reference (022436 .. 022453, of 36359): Subject (028433 .. 028451, of 34107):
Bonsell Harkins Buckingham Geesey Cleaver and Yingling voted for the resolution Noel Wenrich and Casey and Jeff Brown Bonsell Buckingham Harkins Geesey Cleaver and Yingling voted for the resolution with Noel Wenrich and Casey and Jeff Brown
Match 443 (1): Reference (022467 .. 022480, of 36359): Subject (028470 .. 028484, of 34107):
passing the resolution the Board deviated from its regular practice in important respects a passing the resolution the Board deviated from its regular practice in important respects The normal
Match 444 (1): Reference (022482 .. 022493, of 36359): Subject (028500 .. 028512, of 34107):
the Board addressed curriculum changes an entire year in advance of implementation the Board typically addressed curriculum changes an entire year in advance of implementation
Match 445 (1): Reference (022508 .. 022518, of 36359): Subject (028522 .. 028532, of 34107):
during the 2004 05 school year to be effective that year during the 2004 05 school year to be effective that year
Match 446 (1): Reference (022519 .. 022534, of 36359): Subject (028483 .. 028498, of 34107):
The normal procedures were not followed at all in making this change 7 79 C Brown The normal procedures were not followed at all in making this change 7 79 C Brown
Match 447 (1): Reference (022569 .. 022584, of 36359): Subject (028563 .. 028580, of 34107):
before listing them for resolution on the agenda at the action meeting later in the month before they were listed for resolution on the agenda at the action meeting held later in the month
Match 448 (1): Reference (022590 .. 022612, of 36359): Subject (028581 .. 028608, of 34107):
The change to the biology curriculum was placed on the Board s agenda for the first time during an action meeting a number The change to the biology curriculum however was placed on the Board s agenda for the first time during an action meeting which several witnesses testified to be
Match 449 (1): Reference (022631 .. 022646, of 36359): Subject (028624 .. 028639, of 34107):
Brown 29 118 Buckingham c Board practice also called for the District Curriculum Committee to meet B Callahan 29 118 Buckingham Third Board practice called for the District Curriculum Committee to meet
Match 450 (1): Reference (022634 .. 022650, of 36359): Subject (028624 .. 028645, of 34107):
Buckingham c Board practice also called for the District Curriculum Committee to meet to discuss the change B Callahan 29 118 Buckingham Third Board practice called for the District Curriculum Committee to meet and discuss the proposed curriculum change
Match 451 (1): Reference (022660 .. 022669, of 36359): Subject (028634 .. 028645, of 34107):
the District Curriculum Committee meet to discuss the proposed change the District Curriculum Committee to meet and discuss the proposed curriculum change
Match 452 (1): Reference (022671 .. 022683, of 36359): Subject (028655 .. 028668, of 34107):
the Board overruled that suggestion 7 73 C Brown 26 8 10 Nilsen the Board overruled that suggestion 7 72 73 C Brown 26 8 10 Nilsen
Match 453 (1): Reference (022710 .. 022726, of 36359): Subject (028671 .. 028687, of 34107):
administration did send the proposed change to the District Curriculum Committee and received feedback from two members administration did send the proposed change to the District Curriculum Committee and received feedback from two members
Match 454 (1): Reference (022743 .. 022753, of 36359): Subject (028689 .. 028699, of 34107):
change and the other wanted the District Curriculum Committee to meet an opposition and a request for the District Curriculum to meet
Match 455 (1): Reference (022748 .. 022758, of 36359): Subject (028634 .. 028645, of 34107):
the District Curriculum Committee to meet to discuss the proposed change the District Curriculum Committee to meet and discuss the proposed curriculum change
Match 456 (1): Reference (022773 .. 022789, of 36359): Subject (028745 .. 028761, of 34107):
teachers were not included in the process of drafting the language adopted by the Board Curriculum Committee teachers were not included in the process of drafting the language adopted by the Board Curriculum Committee
Match 457 (1): Reference (022790 .. 022803, of 36359): Subject (028728 .. 028742, of 34107):
the Board chose not to follow the advice of their only science education resource the Board brazenly chose not to follow the advice of their only science education resources
Match 458 (1): Reference (022817 .. 022838, of 36359): Subject (028778 .. 028800, of 34107):
defendants testified that the rush to bring the curriculum change to a vote occurred because the issue had been debated for the defense witnesses testified that the rush to bring the curriculum change to a vote occurred because the issue had been debated for the
Match 459 (1): Reference (022840 .. 022882, of 36359): Subject (028802 .. 028844, of 34107):
six months and the Board was about to lose two board members Noel Wenrich and Jane Cleaver who had been a part of those discussions 26 10 12 Nilsen 33 113 14 Bonsell Their record contains no evidence of any public board meetings six months and more importantly the Board was about to lose two Board members Wenrich and Cleaver who had been a part of those discussions 26 10 12 Nilsen 33 113 14 Bonsell The record contains no evidence of any public Board meetings
Match 460 (1): Reference (022890 .. 022903, of 36359): Subject (028852 .. 028865, of 34107):
the evidence shows that the Board did discuss creationism within that six month period the evidence does show that the Board discussed creationism within that six month period
Match 461 (1): Reference (022919 .. 022935, of 36359): Subject (030151 .. 030166, of 34107):
in his parliamentary measures to have the vote delayed until the community could properly debate the issue in parliamentary measures to have the vote delayed until the community could properly debate the issue
Match 462 (1): Reference (022945 .. 022964, of 36359): Subject (028872 .. 028889, of 34107):
Buckingham In reality Buckingham wanted the Board to vote on the resolution on October 18 because he thought he had Buckingham wanted the Board to vote on the resolution on October 18 2004 because he thought he had
Match 463 (1): Reference (022948 .. 022977, of 36359): Subject (028872 .. 028900, of 34107):
Buckingham wanted the Board to vote on the resolution on October 18 because he thought he had all the votes needed to pass the resolution adopted at the October 7 Buckingham wanted the Board to vote on the resolution on October 18 2004 because he thought he had sufficient votes to pass the resolution adopted at the October 7
Match 464 (1): Reference (023119 .. 023128, of 36359): Subject (028915 .. 028924, of 34107):
the October 18 2004 meeting science teachers Spahr and Miller the October 18 2004 meeting science teachers Spahr and Miller
Match 465 (1): Reference (023137 .. 023149, of 36359): Subject (028934 .. 028946, of 34107):
against the curriculum change 13 41 42 J Miller 13 88 93 Spahr against the curriculum change 13 41 42 J Miller 13 88 93 Spahr
Match 466 (1): Reference (023151 .. 023208, of 36359): Subject (028951 .. 029006, of 34107):
her statement to the Board Spahr made clear that the teachers agreement to point out flaws problems with Darwin s theory not to teach origins of life and have Pandas available as a reference text were all compromises with the Board Curriculum Committee after what she described as a long and tiresome process 13 91 92 Spahr She her statement to the Board that the teachers agreement to point out flaws problems with Darwin s theory not to teach origins of life and to have Pandas available as a reference text were all compromises with the Board Curriculum Committee after what she described as a long and tiresome process 13 91 92 Spahr She
Match 467 (1): Reference (023210 .. 023227, of 36359): Subject (029008 .. 029025, of 34107):
stated that the change was being railroaded through without input from the teachers or the District Curriculum Committee stated that the change was being railroaded through without input from the teachers or the District Curriculum Committee
Match 468 (1): Reference (023260 .. 023270, of 36359): Subject (029081 .. 029091, of 34107):
testified that the teachers did not support Pandas in any way testified that the teachers did not support Pandas in any way
Match 469 (1): Reference (023284 .. 023300, of 36359): Subject (029092 .. 029111, of 34107):
but they made compromises to insure the purchase of the biology book 35 119 20 Baksa o but that they made compromises to insure the purchase of the biology book entitled Biology 35 119 20 Baksa Also
Match 470 (1): Reference (023303 .. 023324, of 36359): Subject (029116 .. 029138, of 34107):
suggestion that the teachers supported any part of the curriculum change must be soundly rejected 35 20 21 Baksa The evidence demonstrates suggestion the teachers supported any part of the curriculum change must be soundly rejected 35 20 21 Baksa The unrebuted evidence reveals that
Match 471 (1): Reference (023360 .. 023373, of 36359): Subject (029168 .. 029184, of 34107):
a biology book that should have been provided as a matter of course 35 a biology textbook that should have been approved as a matter of course Remarkably the 6 3
Match 472 (1): Reference (023390 .. 023406, of 36359): Subject (029050 .. 029067, of 34107):
amounted to creationism and could not be taught legally 24 102 Nilsen 35 14 15 Baksa o amounted to creationism and could not be taught legally 24 102 Nilsen 35 14 15 Baksa Baksa provided
Match 473 (1): Reference (023530 .. 023560, of 36359): Subject (029238 .. 029271, of 34107):
Baksa 8 36 C Brown 8 76 12 139 40 J Miller 13 102 Spahr 32 25 26 40 30 23 25 Buckingham 31 182 83 Geesey 34 124 26 Harkins Baksa 8 36 C Brown 8 76 J Brown 12 139 40 J Miller 13 102 Spahr 32 25 26 40 Cleaver 30 23 25 Buckingham 31 182 83 Geesey 34 124 26 Harkins
Match 474 (1): Reference (023562 .. 023571, of 36359): Subject (029221 .. 029231, of 34107):
justification was offered by any board member for the change justification was offered by any Board member for the curriculum change
Match 475 (1): Reference (023562 .. 023574, of 36359): Subject (029221 .. 029230, of 34107):
justification was offered by any board member for the change in the curriculum justification was offered by any Board member for the curriculum
Match 476 (1): Reference (023618 .. 023627, of 36359): Subject (029316 .. 029330, of 34107):
31 175 Geesey 32 50 Cleaver 34 117 18 Harkins 31 175 181 82 Geesey 32 49 50 Cleaver 34 117 18 124 25 Harkins
Match 477 (1): Reference (023632 .. 023644, of 36359): Subject (029376 .. 029386, of 34107):
testified candidly that they did not understand the substance of the curriculum change testified she did not understand the substance of the curriculum change
Match 478 (1): Reference (023638 .. 023664, of 36359): Subject (029304 .. 029333, of 34107):
understand the substance of the curriculum change that was adopted on October 18 2004 31 181 82 Geesey 32 49 50 Cleaver 34 124 25 Harkins o understand the substance of the curriculum change adopted on October 18 2004 31 175 181 82 Geesey 32 49 50 Cleaver 34 117 18 124 25 Harkins In fact one
Match 479 (1): Reference (023684 .. 023696, of 36359): Subject (030274 .. 030286, of 34107):
their decision to incorporate it as part of the high school biology curriculum their decision to incorporate it as part of the high school biology curriculum
Match 480 (1): Reference (023730 .. 023743, of 36359): Subject (029632 .. 029646, of 34107):
Board never heard from any persons or organization with scientific expertise about the change Board never heard from any person or organization with scientific expertise about the curriculum change
Match 481 (1): Reference (023730 .. 023746, of 36359): Subject (029632 .. 029645, of 34107):
Board never heard from any persons or organization with scientific expertise about the change to the curriculum Board never heard from any person or organization with scientific expertise about the curriculum
Match 482 (1): Reference (023748 .. 023759, of 36359): Subject (029654 .. 029666, of 34107):
the district s science teachers who opposed the change 29 109 Buckingham the District s science teachers who uniformly opposed the change 29 109 Buckingham
Match 483 (1): Reference (023760 .. 023777, of 36359): Subject (029692 .. 029710, of 34107):
The only outside organizations the Board consulted prior to the vote were the Discovery Institute and TMLC and The only outside organizations which the Board consulted prior to the vote were the Discovery Institute and TMLC and
Match 484 (1): Reference (023787 .. 023817, of 36359): Subject (029730 .. 029757, of 34107):
information about science education 33 111 12 Bonsell 29 130 137 43 30 10 14 Buckingham The Board received no materials other than Pandas to assist them in making their vote information 33 111 12 Bonsell 29 130 137 43 30 10 14 Buckingham The Board received no materials other than Pandas to assist them in making their vote
Match 485 (1): Reference (023833 .. 023844, of 36359): Subject (029758 .. 029770, of 34107):
No one on the Board or in the administration ever contacted the Nor did anyone on the Board or in the administration ever contact the
Match 486 (1): Reference (023856 .. 023874, of 36359): Subject (029776 .. 029791, of 34107):
Science the National Science Teachers Association the National Association of Biology Teachers or any other organization for information about Science Teachers Association the National Association of Biology Teachers or any other organization for information about
Match 487 (1): Reference (023888 .. 023908, of 36359): Subject (029883 .. 029903, of 34107):
of these organizations have information about teaching evolution readily available on the Internet and they include statements opposing the teaching of of these organizations have information about teaching evolution readily available on the internet and they include statements opposing the teaching of
Match 488 (1): Reference (023917 .. 023928, of 36359): Subject (029349 .. 029362, of 34107):
Board members who voted for the curriculum change that testified at trial Board members Conspicuously Board members who voted for the curriculum change testified at trial
Match 489 (1): Reference (023957 .. 023969, of 36359): Subject (029375 .. 029386, of 34107):
Geesey testified that she did not understand the substance of the curriculum change Geesey testified she did not understand the substance of the curriculum change
Match 490 (1): Reference (023970 .. 023996, of 36359): Subject (029392 .. 029418, of 34107):
31 181 82 Geesey 29 11 12 Buckingham Buckingham Dep 1 3 05 at 59 61 34 48 49 Harkins 33 112 113 Bonsell 26 21 Nilsen 31 181 82 Geesey 29 11 12 Buckingham Buckingham Dep 1 59 61 January 3 2005 34 48 49 Harkins 33 112 13 Bonsell 26 21 Nilsen
Match 491 (1): Reference (024017 .. 024033, of 36359): Subject (029474 .. 029496, of 34107):
of the time of his first deposition two and a half months after the policy was voted of the time of his first deposition which was two and a half months after the ID Policy was approved yet he voted
Match 492 (1): Reference (024042 .. 024051, of 36359): Subject (029592 .. 029604, of 34107):
was that evolution has a design 26 49 50 o was that evolution has a design 26 49 50 Nilsen Despite this collective
Match 493 (1): Reference (024054 .. 024075, of 36359): Subject (029427 .. 029448, of 34107):
voting for the curriculum change Geesey deferred completely to Bonsell and Buckingham 31 154 55 161 62 168 184 87 190 Geesey voting for the curriculum change Geesy deferred completely to Bonsell and Buckingham 31 154 55 161 62 168 184 87 190 Geesey
Match 494 (1): Reference (024076 .. 024095, of 36359): Subject (029506 .. 029524, of 34107):
Cleaver voted for the change despite the objections of the teachers based on assurances from Bonsell 32 23 25 Cleaver Cleaver voted for the curriculum change despite the teachers objections based upon assurances from Bonsell 32 23 25 Cleaver
Match 495 (1): Reference (024102 .. 024115, of 36359): Subject (029558 .. 029570, of 34107):
Pandas except that Bertha Spahr had said it was not a good science book Pandas except that Spahr had said it was not a good science book
Match 496 (1): Reference (024117 .. 024128, of 36359): Subject (029572 .. 029584, of 34107):
should not be used in high school 32 45 46 Cleaver o should not be used in high school 32 45 46 Cleaver In addition
Match 497 (1): Reference (024130 .. 024139, of 36359): Subject (029924 .. 029933, of 34107):
Nilsen and Baksa opposed the curriculum change 35 126 Baksa Nilsen and Baksa opposed the curriculum change 35 126 Baksa
Match 498 (1): Reference (024130 .. 024154, of 36359): Subject (029924 .. 029952, of 34107):
Nilsen and Baksa opposed the curriculum change 35 126 Baksa still feels the curriculum change was wrong 35 127 Baksa o 243 Both Casey Brown Nilsen and Baksa opposed the curriculum change 35 126 Baksa Baksa testified that he still feels the curriculum change was wrong 35 127 Baksa Both Casey and Jeff Brown
Match 499 (1): Reference (024158 .. 024168, of 36359): Subject (029958 .. 029968, of 34107):
resigned at the conclusion of the October 18 2004 board meeting resigned at the conclusion of the October 18 2004 Board meeting
Match 500 (1): Reference (024175 .. 024317, of 36359): Subject (029989 .. 030132, of 34107):
stated There has been a slow but steady marginalization of some board members Our opinions are no longer valued or listened to Our contributions have been minimized or not acknowledged at all A measure of that is the fact that I myself have been twice asked within the past year if I was born again No one has nor should have the right to ask that of a fellow board member An individual s religious beliefs should have no impact on his or her ability to serve as a school board director nor should a person s beliefs be used as a yardstick to measure the value of that service However it has become increasingly evident that is the direction the board has now chosen to go holding a certain religious belief is of paramount importance P680 7 92 93 C Brown o that time There has been a slow but steady marginalization of some board members Our opinions are no longer valued or listened to Our contributions have been minimized or not acknowledged at all A measure of that is the fact that I myself have been twice asked within the past year if I was born again No one has nor should have the right to ask that of a fellow board member An individual s religious beliefs should have no impact on his or her ability to serve as a school board director nor should a person s beliefs be used as a yardstick to measure the value of that service However it has become increasingly evident that it is the direction the board has now chosen to go holding a certain religious belief is of paramount importance 7 92 93 C Brown Additionally
Match 501 (1): Reference (024327 .. 024355, of 36359): Subject (030173 .. 030203, of 34107):
resigned and stated I was referred to as unpatriotic and my religious beliefs were questioned I served in the U S Army for 11 years and six years on resigned and stated the following I was referred to as unpatriotic and my religious beliefs were questioned I served in the U S Army for 11 years and six years on
Match 502 (1): Reference (024357 .. 024392, of 36359): Subject (030205 .. 030241, of 34107):
board Seventeen years of my life have been devoted to public service and my religion is personal It s between me God and my pastor P810 30 126 30 Bernhard Bubb 4 11 12 B Callahan board Seventeen years of my life have been devoted to public service and my religion is personal It s between me God and my pastor P 810 30 126 30 Bernhard Bubb 4 11 12 B Callahan
Match 503 (1): Reference (024428 .. 024441, of 36359): Subject (030320 .. 030333, of 34107):
preparing a statement to be read to students before the evolution unit in biology preparing a statement to be read to students before the evolution unit in biology
Match 504 (1): Reference (024443 .. 024458, of 36359): Subject (030376 .. 030392, of 34107):
first draft of the statement described Darwin s theory of evolution as the dominant scientific theory s initial draft of the statement described Darwin s theory of evolution as the dominant scientific theory
Match 505 (1): Reference (024445 .. 024455, of 36359): Subject (003593 .. 003612, of 34107):
of the statement described Darwin s theory of evolution as the of the statement that the District s conduct communicated in the community by focusing on how the members of the
Match 506 (1): Reference (024463 .. 024491, of 36359): Subject (030398 .. 030428, of 34107):
language from the final version D91 36 22 24 Baksa s draft also stated that there are gaps in Darwin s theory for which there is yet no evidence language from the final version D 91 36 22 24 Baksa Second Baksa s draft stated that there are gaps in Darwin s theory for which there is yet no evidence
Match 507 (1): Reference (024497 .. 024513, of 36359): Subject (030431 .. 030446, of 34107):
Board edited out the word yet so that the statement reads there are gaps in Darwin s Board selectively edited out the word yet so that the statement is read in a considerably
Match 508 (1): Reference (024507 .. 024520, of 36359): Subject (030411 .. 030428, of 34107):
reads there are gaps in Darwin s theory for which there is no evidence s draft stated that there are gaps in Darwin s theory for which there is yet no evidence
Match 509 (1): Reference (024536 .. 024553, of 36359): Subject (030483 .. 030499, of 34107):
suggested that language be added that stated there is a significant amount of evidence supporting Darwin s theory suggested that language be added that there is a significant amount of evidence supporting Darwin s theory
Match 510 (1): Reference (024599 .. 024618, of 36359): Subject (030342 .. 030361, of 34107):
that the final version of the statement communicated a very different message about the theory of evolution than the language that the final version of the statement communicated a very different message about the theory of evolution than the language
Match 511 (1): Reference (024628 .. 024641, of 36359): Subject (030540 .. 030553, of 34107):
final version of the statement prepared by defendants to be read to students in final version of the statement prepared by Defendants to be read to students in
Match 512 (1): Reference (024628 .. 024648, of 36359): Subject (030540 .. 030561, of 34107):
final version of the statement prepared by defendants to be read to students in 9 th grade biology class stated The final version of the statement prepared by Defendants to be read to students in ninth grade biology class states as follows The
Match 513 (1): Reference (024650 .. 024681, of 36359): Subject (000132 .. 000163, of 34107):
standards require students to learn about Darwin s Theory of Evolution and to eventually take a standardized test of which evolution is a part Because Darwin s Theory is a theory it Standards require students to learn about Darwin s Theory of Evolution and eventually to take a standardized test of which evolution is a part Because Darwin s Theory is a theory it
Match 514 (1): Reference (024684 .. 024750, of 36359): Subject (000166 .. 000232, of 34107):
being tested as new evidence is discovered The Theory is not a fact Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence A theory is defined as a well tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin s view The reference book Of Pandas and People is available for students be tested as new evidence is discovered The Theory is not a fact Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence A theory is defined as a well tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations Intelligent Design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin s view The reference book Of Pandas and People is available for students
Match 515 (1): Reference (024761 .. 024773, of 36359): Subject (000237 .. 000246, of 34107):
in an effort to gain an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually involves
Match 516 (1): Reference (024761 .. 024819, of 36359): Subject (000237 .. 000287, of 34107):
in an effort to gain an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves As is true with any theory students are encouraged to keep an open mind The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life up to individual students and their families As a standards driven district class instruction focuses on the standards and preparing students to in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually involves With respect to any theory students are encouraged to keep an open mind The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life to individual students and their families As a Standards driven district class instruction focuses upon preparing students to
Match 517 (1): Reference (024822 .. 024840, of 36359): Subject (030722 .. 030740, of 34107):
on standards based assessments P124 o 249 On January 6 2005 the teachers sent a memo to the Board on Standards based assessments P 124 Subsequently on January 6 2005 the teachers sent a memo to the Board
Match 518 (1): Reference (024848 .. 024860, of 36359): Subject (030743 .. 030757, of 34107):
them from any obligation to read the statement 36 97 Linker The memo they be released from any obligation to read the statement 36 97 Linker The memo
Match 519 (1): Reference (024865 .. 024883, of 36359): Subject (030840 .. 030858, of 34107):
that reading the statement violates our responsibilities as professional educators as set forth in the Code of Professional Practice that reading the statement violates our responsibilities as professional educators as set forth in the Code of Professional Practice
Match 520 (1): Reference (024929 .. 024965, of 36359): Subject (030921 .. 030960, of 34107):
To refer the students to Of Pandas and People as if it is a scientific resource breaches my ethical obligation to provide them with scientific knowledge that that is supported by recognized proof or theory P121 o To refer the students to Of Pandas and People as if it is a scientific resource breaches my ethical obligation to provide them with scientific knowledge that is supported by recognized scientific proof or theory P 121 emphasis in original
Match 521 (1): Reference (024969 .. 024978, of 36359): Subject (000113 .. 000128, of 34107):
read the statement to ninth graders at Dover high school read the following statement to students in the ninth grade biology class at Dover High School
Match 522 (1): Reference (024969 .. 024981, of 36359): Subject (030966 .. 030978, of 34107):
read the statement to ninth graders at Dover high school in January 2005 read the statement to ninth graders at Dover High School in January 2005
Match 523 (1): Reference (025014 .. 025027, of 36359): Subject (030993 .. 031004, of 34107):
35 38 Baksa o 251 The administrators read the statement again in June 2005 35 38 Baksa The administrators read the statement again in June 2005
Match 524 (1): Reference (025032 .. 025052, of 36359): Subject (031005 .. 031024, of 34107):
By that time the defendants had modified the statement to refer to other unnamed books in the library that relate to By that time Defendants had modified the statement to refer to other unnamed books in the library that relate to
Match 525 (1): Reference (025056 .. 025066, of 36359): Subject (031027 .. 031037, of 34107):
Pandas remains the only book identified by name in the statement Pandas remains the only book identified by name in the statement
Match 526 (1): Reference (025078 .. 025097, of 36359): Subject (031044 .. 031066, of 34107):
the other books can be found in the library including whether they are placed near Pandas 35 42 43 Baksa the other books can be found in the library including whether they are placed near Pandas P 131 35 40 42 43 Baksa
Match 527 (1): Reference (025179 .. 025193, of 36359): Subject (031082 .. 031102, of 34107):
a newsletter to the entire Dover community which was prepared in conjunction with TMLC o a newsletter to the entire Dover community in February 2005 which was prepared in conjunction with the TMLC P 127 Additionally
Match 528 (1): Reference (025218 .. 025233, of 36359): Subject (012717 .. 012734, of 34107):
February 2005 the Board unanimously voted to mail a specialized newsletter P127 to the community 15 February 2005 the Board unanimously voted to mail a specialized newsletter to the community Trial Tr vol 15
Match 529 (1): Reference (025235 .. 025246, of 36359): Subject (012745 .. 012753, of 34107):
P821 Although formatted like a typical district newsletter it amounts to an 82 Although formatted like a typical district newsletter an
Match 530 (1): Reference (025246 .. 025255, of 36359): Subject (012768 .. 012777, of 34107):
an aggressive advocacy piece denigrating the scientific theory of evolution an aggressive advocacy piece denigrating the scientific theory of evolution
Match 531 (1): Reference (025266 .. 025309, of 36359): Subject (012787 .. 012833, of 34107):
under Frequently Asked Questions the newsletter demeans the Plaintiffs for protecting their Constitutional rights A small minority of parents have objected to the recent curriculum change by arguing that the Board has acted to impose its own religious beliefs on students P127 at 1 under the heading Frequently Asked Questions demeans Plaintiffs for protecting their Constitutional rights as it states A small minority of parents have objected to the recent curriculum change by arguing that the Board has acted to impose its own religious beliefs on students P 127 at 1
Match 532 (1): Reference (025266 .. 025320, of 36359): Subject (012787 .. 012844, of 34107):
under Frequently Asked Questions the newsletter demeans the Plaintiffs for protecting their Constitutional rights A small minority of parents have objected to the recent curriculum change by arguing that the Board has acted to impose its own religious beliefs on students P127 at 1 b It mentions religion in the second Frequently Asked Questions as under the heading Frequently Asked Questions demeans Plaintiffs for protecting their Constitutional rights as it states A small minority of parents have objected to the recent curriculum change by arguing that the Board has acted to impose its own religious beliefs on students P 127 at 1 Religion is again mentioned in the second Frequently Asked Question as
Match 533 (1): Reference (025370 .. 025406, of 36359): Subject (012859 .. 012897, of 34107):
suggests that scientists engage in trickery and doublespeak about the theory of evolution The word evolution has several meanings and those supporting Darwin s theory of evolution use that confusion in definition to their advantage Id e suggests that scientists engage in trickery and doublespeak about the theory of evolution by stating The word evolution has several meanings and those supporting Darwin s theory of evolution use that confusion in definition to their advantage Id The
Match 534 (1): Reference (025415 .. 025456, of 36359): Subject (012905 .. 012947, of 34107):
is a scientific theory on a par with evolution and other scientific theories The theory of intelligent design ID is a scientific theory that differs from Darwin s view and is endorsed by a growing number of credible scientists Id at 2 is a scientific theory on par with evolution and other scientific theories by explaining The theory of intelligent design ID is a scientific theory that differs from Darwin s view and is endorsed by a growing number of credible scientists Id at 2
Match 535 (1): Reference (025479 .. 025555, of 36359): Subject (012972 .. 013051, of 34107):
In simple terms on a molecular level scientists have discovered a purposeful arrangement of parts which cannot be explained by Darwin s theory In fact since the 1950s advances in molecular biology and chemistry have shown us that living cells the fundamental units of life processes cannot be explained by chance Id g It suggests that evolution has atheistic implications Some have said that before Darwin we thought a benevolent God had created us Biology took away In simple terms on a molecular level scientists have discovered a purposeful arrangement of parts which cannot be explained by Darwin s theory In fact since the 1950s advances in molecular biology and chemistry have shown us that living cells the fundamental units of life processes cannot be explained by chance Id The newsletter suggests that evolution has atheistic implications by indicating that Some have said that before Darwin we thought a benevolent God had created us Biology took away
Match 536 (1): Reference (025557 .. 025577, of 36359): Subject (013053 .. 013076, of 34107):
status as made in the image of God or Darwinism made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist Id h status as made in the image of God or Darwinism made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist Id Finally and notably the
Match 537 (1): Reference (025626 .. 025661, of 36359): Subject (013087 .. 013122, of 34107):
Anthony Flew described as a world famous atheist who now believes in intelligent design as follows My whole life has been guided by the principle of Plato s Socrates Follow the evidence where it leads Id Anthony Flew described as a world famous atheist who now believes in intelligent design as follows My whole life has been guided by the principle of Plato s Socrates Follow the evidence where it leads Id
Match 538 (1): Reference (025694 .. 025703, of 36359): Subject (031131 .. 031139, of 34107):
Effect of the Board s Actions on the Plaintiffs o Effect of Board s Actions on Plaintiffs Plaintiffs provided
Match 539 (1): Reference (025694 .. 025705, of 36359): Subject (031131 .. 031138, of 34107):
Effect of the Board s Actions on the Plaintiffs o 256 Plaintiffs Effect of Board s Actions on Plaintiffs Plaintiffs
Match 540 (1): Reference (025707 .. 025717, of 36359): Subject (031144 .. 031155, of 34107):
the harm caused by the Board s policy on their children the harm caused by the Board s ID Policy on their children
Match 541 (1): Reference (025707 .. 025727, of 36359): Subject (031144 .. 031164, of 34107):
the harm caused by the Board s policy on their children their families and themselves in consistent but uniquely personal ways the harm caused by the Board s ID Policy on their children fam ilies and themselves in consistent but personal ways
Match 542 (1): Reference (025733 .. 025782, of 36359): Subject (031169 .. 031220, of 34107):
is an inherently religious concept and that its inclusion in the district s science curriculum interferes with their rights to teach their children about religion 3 118 119 Kitzmiller 4 13 15 Callahan 6 77 78 C Rehm 6 106 Eveland 16 26 30 Stough 17 147 48 Leib o is an inherently religious concept and that its inclusion in the District s science curriculum interferes with their rights to teach their children about religion 3 118 19 Kitzmiller 4 13 15 B Callahan 6 77 78 C Rehm 6 106 Eveland 16 26 30 Stough 17 147 48 Leib Plaintiffs additionally
Match 543 (1): Reference (025951 .. 025968, of 36359): Subject (031221 .. 031238, of 34107):
testified that their children confront challenges to their religious beliefs at school because of the Board s actions testified that their children confront challenges to their religious beliefs at school because of the Board s actions
Match 544 (1): Reference (026155 .. 026164, of 36359): Subject (031274 .. 031283, of 34107):
Joel Leib whose family has lived in Dover for generations Joel Leib whose family has lived in Dover for generations
Match 545 (1): Reference (026168 .. 026300, of 36359): Subject (031301 .. 031443, of 34107):
Well it s driven a wedge where there hasn t been a wedge before People are afraid to talk to people for fear and that s happened to me They re afraid to talk to me because I m on the wrong side of the fence 17 146 147 o 261 Board members opposing the curriculum change and its implementation have been confronted directly Casey Brown testified that following her opposition to the curriculum change on October 18 Buckingham called her an atheist and Bonsell told her she would go to hell 7 94 95 8 32 Angie Yingling was coerced into voting for the curriculum change by board members accusing her of being an atheist and un Christian 15 95 97 Sneath Both Bryan Rehm and Fred Callahan have been confronted in Well it s driven a wedge where there hasn t been a wedge before People are afraid to talk to people for fear and that s happened to me They re afraid to talk to me because I m on the wrong side of the fence 17 146 47 Leib Moreover Board members and teachers opposing the curriculum change and its implementation have been confronted directly First Casey Brown testified that following her opposition to the curriculum change on October 18 2004 Buckingham called her an atheist and Bonsell told her that she would go to hell 7 94 95 8 32 C Brown Second Angie Yingling was coerced into voting for the curriculum change by Board members accusing her of being an atheist and un Christian 15 95 97 Sneath In addition both Bryan Rehm and Fred Callahan have been confronted in
Match 546 (1): Reference (026304 .. 026313, of 36359): Subject (031453 .. 031462, of 34107):
4 93 96 B Rehm 8 115 16 F Callahan 4 93 96 B Rehm 8 115 16 F Callahan
Match 547 (1): Reference (026446 .. 026455, of 36359): Subject (013900 .. 013910, of 34107):
The Board s actions from June through October 18 2004 The Board s actions from June 2004 through October 18 2004
Match 548 (1): Reference (026456 .. 026493, of 36359): Subject (013919 .. 013974, of 34107):
were consistently reported in news articles in the two local papers the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch P44 P804 P45 P805 P46 P790 P47 P791 P51 P792 P53 P793 P54 P806 P55 P64 P682 P795 P683 were consistently reported in news articles in the two local newspapers the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch P 44 P 804 P 45 P 805 P 46 P 790 P 47 P 791 P 51 P 792 P 53 P 793 P 54 P 806 P 55 P 795 P 807 P 809 P
Match 549 (1): Reference (026508 .. 026550, of 36359): Subject (013977 .. 014022, of 34107):
most of the plaintiffs did not attend the 2004 board meetings that preceded the curriculum change and became aware of the Board s actions only after reading about them in the local papers Tammy Kitzmiller Beth Eveland Cindy Sneath Steven Stough and Joel Most of the Plaintiffs testified that they did not attend the 2004 Board meetings that preceded the curriculum change and became aware of the Board s actions only after reading about them in the local newspapers Tammy Kitzmiller Beth Eveland Cindy Sneath Steven Stough and Joel
Match 550 (1): Reference (026552 .. 026569, of 36359): Subject (014024 .. 014041, of 34107):
all first learned of the Board s actions regarding the biology curriculum and textbook from the news articles all first learned of the Board s actions regarding the biology curriculum and textbook from the news articles
Match 551 (1): Reference (026588 .. 026621, of 36359): Subject (021432 .. 021468, of 34107):
Stough testified he read the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch every day including on the Internet while he was away on vacation to follow the Board s actions relating to the change Stough testified that he read the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch every day including on the internet while he was away on vacation to follow the Board s actions relating to the biology curriculum change
Match 552 (1): Reference (026588 .. 026631, of 36359): Subject (021432 .. 021474, of 34107):
Stough testified he read the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch every day including on the Internet while he was away on vacation to follow the Board s actions relating to the change to the biology curriculum 15 112 113 16 4 o Stough testified that he read the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch every day including on the internet while he was away on vacation to follow the Board s actions relating to the biology curriculum change 15 112 13 16 4 Stough
Match 553 (1): Reference (026633 .. 026655, of 36359): Subject (014083 .. 014105, of 34107):
The news reports in the York newspapers were followed by numerous letters to the editor and editorials published in the same papers Plaintiffs The news reports in the York newspapers were followed by numerous letters to the editor and editorials published in the same papers P
Match 554 (1): Reference (026706 .. 026753, of 36359): Subject (014788 .. 014840, of 34107):
that the Dover community perceives the Board as having acted to promote religion with many citizens lined up as either for the curriculum change on religious grounds or against the curriculum change on the grounds that religion should not play a role in public school science class a that members of the Dover community perceived the Board as having acted to promote religion with many citizens lined up as either for the curriculum change on religious grounds or against the curriculum change on the ground that religion should not play a role in public school science class Accordingly the letters and
Match 555 (1): Reference (026753 .. 026768, of 36359): Subject (014516 .. 014531, of 34107):
a The York Daily Record published 139 letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions assertion The York Daily Record published 139 letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions
Match 556 (1): Reference (026770 .. 026798, of 36359): Subject (014533 .. 014560, of 34107):
Eighty six of those letters addressed the issues in religious terms 16 18 20 Stough b The York Daily Record published forty three editorials regarding the Board s actions eighty six of those letters addressed the issues in religious terms 16 18 20 Stough The York Daily Record published forty three editorials regarding the Board s actions
Match 557 (1): Reference (026814 .. 026830, of 36359): Subject (014578 .. 014593, of 34107):
Stough c The York Dispatch published eighty six letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions Stough The York Dispatch published eighty six letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions
Match 558 (1): Reference (026833 .. 026842, of 36359): Subject (014535 .. 014544, of 34107):
of those letters addressed the issues in religious terms 16 of those letters addressed the issues in religious terms 16
Match 559 (1): Reference (026836 .. 026849, of 36359): Subject (014567 .. 014582, of 34107):
addressed the issues in religious terms 16 24 Stough d The York Dispatch published addressed the issues in religious terms P 674 16 22 24 Stough The York Dispatch published
Match 560 (1): Reference (026836 .. 026856, of 36359): Subject (014597 .. 014616, of 34107):
addressed the issues in religious terms 16 24 Stough d The York Dispatch published nineteen editorials regarding the Board s actions addressed the issue in religious terms 16 24 Stough The York Dispatch published nineteen editorials regarding the Board s actions
Match 561 (1): Reference (027030 .. 027043, of 36359): Subject (014523 .. 014531, of 34107):
letters to the editor in the York newspapers opposed to the Board s actions letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions
Match 562 (1): Reference (027044 .. 027059, of 36359): Subject (014822 .. 014840, of 34107):
on the grounds that religion should not play a role in public school science class a on the ground that religion should not play a role in public school science class Accordingly the letters and
Match 563 (1): Reference (027328 .. 027343, of 36359): Subject (014822 .. 014840, of 34107):
on the grounds that religion should not play a role in public school science class a on the ground that religion should not play a role in public school science class Accordingly the letters and
Match 564 (1): Reference (027515 .. 027536, of 36359): Subject (027965 .. 027986, of 34107):
Both Bonsell and Buckingham lied at their January 3 2005 depositions about their knowledge of the source of the donation for Pandas both Bonsell and Buckingham lied at their January 3 2005 depositions about their knowledge of the source of the donation for Pandas
Match 565 (1): Reference (028643 .. 028655, of 36359): Subject (023452 .. 023463, of 34107):
the board member referred to in the Trudy Peterman memo P26 who wanted the unnamed Board member referred to in Peterman s memo who wanted
Match 566 (1): Reference (028655 .. 028666, of 36359): Subject (023175 .. 023182, of 34107):
wanted to teach creationism on a 50 50 basis with evolution in wanted creationism taught 50 50 with evolution in
Match 567 (1): Reference (028704 .. 028715, of 36359): Subject (023175 .. 023182, of 34107):
wanted to teach creationism on a 50 50 basis with evolution in wanted creationism taught 50 50 with evolution in
Match 568 (1): Reference (030189 .. 030206, of 36359): Subject (025590 .. 025607, of 34107):
Rehm 6 96 Eveland 7 26 27 C Brown 8 63 J Brown 8 105 06 F Callahan Rehm 6 96 Eveland 7 26 27 C Brown 8 63 J Brown 8 105 06 F Callahan
Match 569 (1): Reference (030365 .. 030377, of 36359): Subject (027686 .. 027697, of 34107):
so that plaintiffs could decide whether to seek a temporary restraining order o so Plaintiffs could decide whether to seek a temporary restraining order upon
Match 570 (1): Reference (030637 .. 030646, of 36359): Subject (028027 .. 028036, of 34107):
the President and the Chair of the Board Curriculum Committee the Board President and the Chair of the Curriculum Committee
Match 571 (1): Reference (030708 .. 030722, of 36359): Subject (029316 .. 029333, of 34107):
31 181 82 Geesey 32 49 50 Cleaver 34 117 18 124 25 Harkins o 31 175 181 82 Geesey 32 49 50 Cleaver 34 117 18 124 25 Harkins In fact one
Match 572 (1): Reference (030767 .. 030780, of 36359): Subject (025138 .. 025151, of 34107):
this country was founded on Christianity and our students should be taught as such This country was founded on Christianity and our students should be taught as such
Match 573 (1): Reference (031224 .. 031234, of 36359): Subject (029758 .. 029769, of 34107):
No one on the Board or in the administration ever contacted Nor did anyone on the Board or in the administration ever contact
Match 574 (1): Reference (031246 .. 031264, of 36359): Subject (029776 .. 029791, of 34107):
Science the National Science Teachers Association the National Association of Biology Teachers or any other organization for information about Science Teachers Association the National Association of Biology Teachers or any other organization for information about
Match 575 (1): Reference (031390 .. 031401, of 36359): Subject (027631 .. 027641, of 34107):
i Bonsell and Buckingham tried to hide the source of the donation Buckingham and Bonsell tried to hide the source of the donations
Match 576 (1): Reference (031495 .. 031517, of 36359): Subject (031984 .. 032006, of 34107):
that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board s real purpose which was to promote religion that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board s real purpose which was to promote religion
Match 577 (1): Reference (031618 .. 031627, of 36359): Subject (008639 .. 008649, of 34107):
the testimony of plaintiffs science education expert Dr Brian Alters the unrefuted testimony of Plaintiffs scien ce education expert Dr Alters
Match 578 (1): Reference (032675 .. 032688, of 36359): Subject (030777 .. 030793, of 34107):
misleads students about the status of evolution as a scientific theory and that there read to students at the beginning of the biology evolution unit of the class and that they
Match 579 (1): Reference (032886 .. 032895, of 36359): Subject (008767 .. 008776, of 34107):
learning about evolution only because it is required by Pennsylvania learn about evolutionary theory because it is required by Pennsylvania
Match 580 (1): Reference (032968 .. 033001, of 36359): Subject (010678 .. 010712, of 34107):
sets up what will be perceived by students as a God friendly science the one that mentions an intelligent designer and that other science evolution that takes no position on religion 14 144 45 sets up what will be perceived by students as a God friendly science the one that explicitly mentions an intelligent designer and that the other science evolution takes no position on religion 14 144 45
Match 581 (1): Reference (033099 .. 033153, of 36359): Subject (010718 .. 010775, of 34107):
a false duality And it tells students quite explicitly choose God on the side of intelligent design or choose atheism on the side of science 2 54 55 Introducing such a religious conflict into the classroom is very dangerous because it forces students to choose between God and science not a choice schools should be a false duality is produced It tells students quite explicitly choose God on the side of intelligent design or choose atheism on the side of science 2 54 55 Miller Introducing such a religious conflict into the classroom is very dangerous because it forces students to choose between God and science not a choice that schools should be
Match 582 (1): Reference (033260 .. 033277, of 36359): Subject (011951 .. 011968, of 34107):
Dr Alters rejects Dover s explanation that its curriculum change and the statement implementing it are not teaching Dr Alters rejected Dover s explanation that its curriculum change and the statement implementing it are not teaching
Match 583 (1): Reference (033283 .. 033292, of 36359): Subject (011972 .. 011984, of 34107):
that substantive misconceptions about the nature of science evolution and a mini lecture providing substantive misconceptions about the nature of science evolution and
Match 584 (1): Reference (034418 .. 034434, of 36359): Subject (031685 .. 031704, of 34107):
relied solely on legal advice from two organizations with religious cultural and legal missions i e the relied solely on legal advice from two organizations with demonstrably religious cultural and legal missions the Discovery Institute and the
Match 585 (1): Reference (034912 .. 034923, of 36359): Subject (033263 .. 033274, of 34107):
the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Match 586 (1): Reference (034929 .. 034938, of 36359): Subject (000518 .. 000529, of 34107):
and Art I Sec 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution o and Art I 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution B The Parties to
Match 587 (1): Reference (034950 .. 034965, of 36359): Subject (032421 .. 032436, of 34107):
a religious view of biological origins into the biology course in violation of the Establishment Clause a religious view of biological origins into the biology course in violation of the Establishment Clause
Match 588 (1): Reference (034971 .. 034980, of 36359): Subject (000518 .. 000529, of 34107):
and Art I Sec 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution o and Art I 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution B The Parties to
Match 589 (1): Reference (034982 .. 035005, of 36359): Subject (032408 .. 032430, of 34107):
The effect of the defendants actions in adopting the curriculum change was to impose a religious view of biological origins into the biology course The effect of Defendants actions in adopting the curriculum change was to impose a religious view of biological origins into the biology course
Match 590 (1): Reference (035025 .. 035034, of 36359): Subject (000518 .. 000529, of 34107):
and Art I Sec 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution o and Art I 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution B The Parties to
Match 591 (1): Reference (035069 .. 035078, of 36359): Subject (000518 .. 000529, of 34107):
and Art I Sec 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution o and Art I 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution B The Parties to
Match 592 (1): Reference (035083 .. 035094, of 36359): Subject (033254 .. 033265, of 34107):
preserve the separation of church and state mandated by the Establishment Clause preserve the separation of church and state mandated by the Establishment Clause
Match 593 (1): Reference (035121 .. 035144, of 36359): Subject (033305 .. 033329, of 34107):
from requiring teachers to denigrate or disparage the scientific theory of evolution and from requiring teachers to refer to an alternative theory known as from requiring teachers to denigrate or disparage the scientific theory of evolution and from requiring teachers to refer to a religious alternative theory known as
Match 594 (1): Reference (035154 .. 035179, of 36359): Subject (033334 .. 033360, of 34107):
issue a declaratory judgment that plaintiffs rights under the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have been violated by defendants actions o issue a declaratory judgment that Plaintiffs rights under the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have been violated by Defendants actions Defendants actions
Match 595 (1): Reference (035182 .. 035242, of 36359): Subject (033358 .. 033415, of 34107):
actions of the defendants in violation of Plaintiffs civil rights as guaranteed to them by the Constitution of the United States and 42 U S C 1983 subjects defendants to liability not only with respect to injunctive and declaratory relief but also for nominal damages and the reasonable value of plaintiffs attorneys services and costs incurred in vindicating plaintiffs constitutional rights actions Defendants actions in violation of Plaintiffs civil rights as guaranteed to them by the Constitution of the United States and 42 U S C 1983 subject Defendants to liability with respect to injunctive and declaratory relief but also for nominal damages and the reasonable value of Plaintiffs attorneys services and costs incurred in vindicating Plaintiffs constitutional rights 
Run Lengths: 
0001 : 181145
0010 : 53
0011 : 46
0012 : 40
0013 : 38
0014 : 43
0015 : 22
0016 : 28
0017 : 26
0018 : 25
0019 : 24
0020 : 22
0021 : 14
0022 : 17
0023 : 13
0024 : 16
0025 : 11
0026 : 9
0027 : 16
0028 : 7
0029 : 6
0030 : 5
0031 : 4
0032 : 9
0033 : 7
0034 : 6
0035 : 4
0036 : 7
0037 : 10
0038 : 3
0039 : 2
0040 : 5
0041 : 2
0042 : 2
0043 : 6
0044 : 3
0045 : 3
0047 : 5
0048 : 2
0049 : 2
0050 : 3
0053 : 1
0055 : 3
0056 : 1
0057 : 2
0058 : 3
0059 : 1
0060 : 1
0061 : 1
0062 : 2
0067 : 2
0073 : 1
0077 : 1
0078 : 1
0080 : 1
0081 : 1
0082 : 1
0084 : 1
0088 : 1
0090 : 1
0109 : 1
0112 : 1
0117 : 1
0133 : 1
0139 : 1
0143 : 1
0155 : 1

Runmin=10, Wordskip=4, Anchormin=6, Smallword=4, Wordratio=0.7

About 12863 words out of 36360 words (35 %) in ppfof_full.txt are due to decfull.txt
ppfof_full.txt,36360,decfull.txt,34108,595,12863,35
Wed Dec 20 09:43:03 PST 2006
Processing time: 443 seconds.