| Match 1 (1):
Reference (000057 .. 000074, of 34107): |
Subject (021964 .. 021980, of 36359): |
|
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution |
Students will be made aware of gaps in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution |
| Match 2 (1):
Reference (000057 .. 000081, of 34107): |
Subject (022174 .. 022198, of 36359): |
|
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design |
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design |
| Match 3 (1):
Reference (000057 .. 000088, of 34107): |
Subject (022369 .. 022400, of 36359): |
|
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design Note Origins of Life is not taught |
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design Note Origins of Life is not taught |
| Match 4 (1):
Reference (000114 .. 000129, of 34107): |
Subject (024631 .. 024648, of 36359): |
|
the following statement to students in the ninth grade biology class at Dover High School The |
the statement prepared by defendants to be read to students in 9 th grade biology class stated The |
| Match 5 (1):
Reference (000132 .. 000163, of 34107): |
Subject (024650 .. 024681, of 36359): |
|
Standards require students to learn about Darwin s Theory of Evolution and eventually to take a standardized test of which evolution is a part Because Darwin s Theory is a theory it |
standards require students to learn about Darwin s Theory of Evolution and to eventually take a standardized test of which evolution is a part Because Darwin s Theory is a theory it |
| Match 6 (1):
Reference (000166 .. 000232, of 34107): |
Subject (024684 .. 024750, of 36359): |
|
be tested as new evidence is discovered The Theory is not a fact Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence A theory is defined as a well tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations Intelligent Design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin s view The reference book Of Pandas and People is available for students |
being tested as new evidence is discovered The Theory is not a fact Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence A theory is defined as a well tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin s view The reference book Of Pandas and People is available for students |
| Match 7 (1):
Reference (000225 .. 000246, of 34107): |
Subject (010882 .. 010903, of 36359): |
|
Of Pandas and People is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually involves |
Of Pandas and People is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves |
| Match 8 (1):
Reference (000250 .. 000287, of 34107): |
Subject (024778 .. 024819, of 36359): |
|
any theory students are encouraged to keep an open mind The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life to individual students and their families As a Standards driven district class instruction focuses upon preparing students to |
any theory students are encouraged to keep an open mind The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life up to individual students and their families As a standards driven district class instruction focuses on the standards and preparing students to |
| Match 9 (1):
Reference (000337 .. 000349, of 34107): |
Subject (034913 .. 034923, of 36359): |
|
establishment of religion prohibited by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution |
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution |
| Match 10 (1):
Reference (000515 .. 000525, of 34107): |
Subject (034925 .. 034937, of 36359): |
|
United States Constitution and Art I 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution |
U S C 1983 and Art I Sec 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution |
| Match 11 (1):
Reference (000553 .. 000565, of 34107): |
Subject (013351 .. 013366, of 36359): |
|
resident of Dover Pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the ninth |
resident of Dover Pennsylvania She is a parent of a child in the second grade in |
| Match 12 (1):
Reference (000567 .. 000577, of 34107): |
Subject (013436 .. 013449, of 36359): |
|
and a child in the eleventh grade at Dover High School |
a parent of a child in the eleventh grade at Dover Area High School |
| Match 13 (1):
Reference (000590 .. 000601, of 34107): |
Subject (012976 .. 012987, of 36359): |
|
first learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers |
first learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers |
| Match 14 (1):
Reference (000602 .. 000616, of 34107): |
Subject (012994 .. 013008, of 36359): |
|
Bryan and Christy Rehm residents of Dover Pennsylvania are parents of a child in the |
Bryan and Christy Rehm are residents of Dover Pennsylvania They have a child in the |
| Match 15 (1):
Reference (000629 .. 000641, of 34107): |
Subject (013031 .. 013043, of 36359): |
|
in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age |
in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age |
| Match 16 (1):
Reference (000652 .. 000684, of 34107): |
Subject (013054 .. 013089, of 36359): |
|
Bryan Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of being a member of the science faculty at Dover Area High School Before and after his resignation he regularly attended Board meetings |
Bryan Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of being a member of the science faculty at Dover Area High School 4 39 41 Before and after his resignation he regularly attended Board meetings |
| Match 17 (1):
Reference (000689 .. 000705, of 34107): |
Subject (013095 .. 013111, of 36359): |
|
Christy Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of discussions she had with her husband |
Christy Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of discussions she had with her husband |
| Match 18 (1):
Reference (000714 .. 000732, of 34107): |
Subject (013139 .. 013159, of 36359): |
|
Deborah F Fenimore and Joel A Leib residents of Dover Pennsylvania are the parents of a child in the |
Deborah F Fenimore and Joel A Leib are residents of Dover Pennsylvania They are the parents of a child in the |
| Match 19 (1):
Reference (000764 .. 000773, of 34107): |
Subject (013183 .. 013192, of 36359): |
|
Leib first learned of a change in the biology curriculum |
Leib first learned of a change in the biology curriculum |
| Match 20 (1):
Reference (000766 .. 000777, of 34107): |
Subject (013244 .. 013254, of 36359): |
|
learned of a change in the biology curriculum by reading local newspapers |
learned of the biology curriculum change by reading the local newspapers |
| Match 21 (1):
Reference (000780 .. 000791, of 34107): |
Subject (013351 .. 013363, of 36359): |
|
resident of Dover Pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the |
resident of Dover Pennsylvania She is a parent of a child in the |
| Match 22 (1):
Reference (000785 .. 000809, of 34107): |
Subject (013152 .. 013178, of 36359): |
|
a parent of a child in the eighth grade in the Dover Area School District and intends for his child to attend Dover High School |
are the parents of a child in the eighth grade in the Dover Area School District and intend to send their child to Dover Area High School |
| Match 23 (1):
Reference (000810 .. 000819, of 34107): |
Subject (013229 .. 013238, of 36359): |
|
Stough did not attend any Board meetings until December 2004 |
Stough did not attend any board meetings until December 2004 |
| Match 24 (1):
Reference (000810 .. 000836, of 34107): |
Subject (013229 .. 013254, of 36359): |
|
Stough did not attend any Board meetings until December 2004 and prior to that he had learned of the biology curriculum change by reading the local newspapers |
Stough did not attend any board meetings until December 2004 Prior to that he had learned of the biology curriculum change by reading the local newspapers |
| Match 25 (1):
Reference (000837 .. 000851, of 34107): |
Subject (013261 .. 013278, of 36359): |
|
Beth A Eveland resident of York Pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the |
Beth A Eveland is a resident of York Pennsylvania She is the parent of a child in the |
| Match 26 (1):
Reference (000848 .. 000866, of 34107): |
Subject (013023 .. 013043, of 36359): |
|
a child in the first grade in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age |
a child in the first grade at schools in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age |
| Match 27 (1):
Reference (000868 .. 000909, of 34107): |
Subject (013295 .. 013341, of 36359): |
|
intends for her children to attend Dover High School Eveland attended her first Board meeting on June 14 2004 Prior to that she had learned of the issues relating to the purchase of the biology books from reading the York Daily Record |
intends to send her children to Dover Area High School 6 92 93 Eveland Eveland attended her first board meeting on June 14 2004 Prior to that she had learned of the issues relating to the purchase of the biology books from reading the York Daily Record |
| Match 28 (1):
Reference (000911 .. 000924, of 34107): |
Subject (013347 .. 013363, of 36359): |
|
Cynthia Sneath resident of Dover Pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the |
Cynthia Sneath is a resident of Dover Pennsylvania She is a parent of a child in the |
| Match 29 (1):
Reference (000921 .. 000939, of 34107): |
Subject (013023 .. 013043, of 36359): |
|
a child in the first grade in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age |
a child in the first grade at schools in the Dover Area School District and a child of pre school age |
| Match 30 (1):
Reference (000941 .. 000959, of 34107): |
Subject (013380 .. 013403, of 36359): |
|
intends for her children to attend Dover High School Sneath attended her first Board meeting on October 18 2004 |
intends to send her children to Dover Area High School 15 75 76 Sneath Sneath attended her first board meeting on October 18 2004 |
| Match 31 (1):
Reference (000966 .. 000976, of 34107): |
Subject (012977 .. 012987, of 36359): |
|
learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers |
learned of the biology curriculum controversy from reading the local newspapers |
| Match 32 (1):
Reference (000979 .. 000990, of 34107): |
Subject (013266 .. 013278, of 36359): |
|
resident of York Pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the |
resident of York Pennsylvania She is the parent of a child in the |
| Match 33 (1):
Reference (001007 .. 001017, of 34107): |
Subject (013056 .. 013069, of 36359): |
|
learned of and followed the biology curriculum controversy by reading the |
learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of being a member of the |
| Match 34 (1):
Reference (001007 .. 001019, of 34107): |
Subject (013467 .. 013479, of 36359): |
|
learned of and followed the biology curriculum controversy by reading the local newspapers |
learned of and followed the biology curriculum controversy by reading the local newspapers |
| Match 35 (1):
Reference (001024 .. 001046, of 34107): |
Subject (013489 .. 013517, of 36359): |
|
and Frederick B Callahan residents of Dover Pennsylvania are parents of a child in the tenth grade at Dover High School Barrie Callahan |
and Frederick B Callahan are residents of Dover Pennsylvania They are parents of a child in the eleventh grade at Dover Area High School 3 123 124 B Callahan |
| Match 36 (1):
Reference (001046 .. 001055, of 34107): |
Subject (013052 .. 013064, of 36359): |
|
Callahan learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of |
C Rehm Bryan Rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of |
| Match 37 (1):
Reference (001046 .. 001067, of 34107): |
Subject (013523 .. 013544, of 36359): |
|
Callahan learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of her status of a former Board member and from attending Board meetings |
Callahan learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of her status as a former board member and from attending board meetings |
| Match 38 (1):
Reference (001099 .. 001108, of 34107): |
Subject (012738 .. 012746, of 36359): |
|
Dover Area School District Board of Directors hereinafter the Board |
Dover Area School District Board of Directors the Board |
| Match 39 (1):
Reference (001129 .. 001139, of 34107): |
Subject (012752 .. 012762, of 36359): |
|
is comprised of Dover Township Washington Township and Dover Borough all |
is comprised of Dover Township Washington Township and Dover Borough all |
| Match 40 (1):
Reference (001144 .. 001155, of 34107): |
Subject (012763 .. 012774, of 36359): |
|
in York County Pennsylvania There are approximately 3 700 students in the |
in York County Pennsylvania There are approximately 3 700 students in the |
| Match 41 (1):
Reference (001157 .. 001170, of 34107): |
Subject (012777 .. 012792, of 36359): |
|
with approximately 1 000 attending Dover High School Joint Stip of Fact 3 The |
with approximately 1 000 attending Dover High School Joint Stipulations of Fact 3 o 123 There |
| Match 42 (1):
Reference (001553 .. 001566, of 34107): |
Subject (003679 .. 003691, of 36359): |
|
the Supreme Court turned the proscription against teaching creation science in the public school |
the Supreme Court s Edwards decision that teaching creation science in public schools |
| Match 43 (1):
Reference (003915 .. 003926, of 34107): |
Subject (035293 .. 035307, of 36359): |
|
of Defendants actions it is necessary to trace the history of the |
of the Board s actions is the promotion or endorsement of religion and thus they |
| Match 44 (1):
Reference (005057 .. 005068, of 34107): |
Subject (001042 .. 001054, of 36359): |
|
and who has written extensively on the subject of evolution and religion |
a theologian who has written extensively on the subject of evolution and religion |
| Match 45 (1):
Reference (005079 .. 005096, of 34107): |
Subject (001104 .. 001120, of 36359): |
|
is not a new scientific argument but is rather an old religious argument for the existence of God |
is not a new scientific argument but rather an old religious argument for the existence of God |
| Match 46 (1):
Reference (005079 .. 005145, of 34107): |
Subject (001104 .. 001168, of 36359): |
|
is not a new scientific argument but is rather an old religious argument for the existence of God He traced this argument back to at least Thomas Aquinas in the 13 th century who framed the argument as a syllogism Wherever complex design exists there must have been a designer nature is complex therefore nature must have had an intelligent designer Trial Tr vol 9 Haught Test |
is not a new scientific argument but rather an old religious argument for the existence of God This argument traces back at least to Thomas Aquinas in the 13 th century who framed the argument as a syllogism Wherever complex design exists there must have been a designer nature is complex therefore nature must have had an intelligent designer 9 1 Haught Dr Haught testified |
| Match 47 (1):
Reference (005151 .. 005166, of 34107): |
Subject (001166 .. 001181, of 36359): |
|
Dr Haught testified that Aquinas was explicit that this intelligent designer everyone understands to be God |
Dr Haught testified that Aquinas was explicit that this intelligent designer everyone understands to be God |
| Match 48 (1):
Reference (005168 .. 005179, of 34107): |
Subject (001185 .. 001196, of 36359): |
|
The syllogism described by Dr Haught is essentially the same argument for |
The syllogism described by Dr Haught is essentially the same argument for |
| Match 49 (1):
Reference (005182 .. 005220, of 34107): |
Subject (001199 .. 001235, of 36359): |
|
presented by defense expert witnesses Professors Behe and Minnich who employ the phrase purposeful arrangement of parts Dr Haught testified that this argument for the existence of God was advanced early in the 19 th century by Reverend Paley |
presented by Professors Behe and Minnich employing the phrase purposeful arrangement of parts o 3 Dr Haught testified that this argument for the existence of God was advanced early in the 19 th Century by Reverend Paley |
| Match 50 (1):
Reference (005234 .. 005249, of 34107): |
Subject (001251 .. 001265, of 36359): |
|
based on the purposeful arrangement of parts is the same one that Paley made for design |
based on purposeful arrangement of parts is the same one that Paley made for design |
| Match 51 (1):
Reference (005272 .. 005288, of 34107): |
Subject (001305 .. 001320, of 36359): |
|
Nov 4 2005 The only apparent difference between the argument made by Paley and the argument for |
o 4 The only apparent difference between the argument made by Paley and the argument for |
| Match 52 (1):
Reference (005302 .. 005313, of 34107): |
Subject (001333 .. 001344, of 36359): |
|
s official position does not acknowledge that the designer is God However |
s official position does not acknowledge that the designer is God However |
| Match 53 (1):
Reference (005315 .. 005335, of 34107): |
Subject (001354 .. 001373, of 36359): |
|
Dr Haught testified anyone familiar with Western religious thought would immediately make the association that the tactically unnamed designer is God |
Dr Haught testified anyone familiar with western religious thought would immediately make the association that the unnamed designer is God |
| Match 54 (1):
Reference (005361 .. 005371, of 34107): |
Subject (001395 .. 001405, of 36359): |
|
any intelligent actor known to exist in the natural world P |
any intelligent actor known to exist in the natural world Professors |
| Match 55 (1):
Reference (005381 .. 005405, of 34107): |
Subject (001405 .. 001431, of 36359): |
|
Professors Behe and Minnich admitted their personal view is that the designer is God and Professor Minnich testified that he understands many leading advocates of |
Professors Behe and Minnich acknowledged that it was their personal view that the designer is God and Professor Minnich testified that he understands many leading advocates of |
| Match 56 (1):
Reference (005422 .. 005441, of 34107): |
Subject (001466 .. 001482, of 36359): |
|
proponents of the IDM occasionally suggest that the designer could be a space alien or a time traveling cell biologist |
proponents occasionally suggest that the designer could be a space alien or a time traveling cell biologist |
| Match 57 (1):
Reference (005493 .. 005527, of 34107): |
Subject (001515 .. 001550, of 36359): |
|
what kind of intelligent agent was it the designer and answer On its own science cannot answer this question It must leave it to religion and philosophy P 11 at 7 9 13 14 Haught |
what kind of intelligent agent was it the designer and answers On its own science cannot answer this question It must leave it to religion and philosophy P11 at 7 emphasis added 9 13 14 Haught |
| Match 58 (1):
Reference (005557 .. 005570, of 34107): |
Subject (001600 .. 001614, of 36359): |
|
proponents reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity |
proponents similarly reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity |
| Match 59 (1):
Reference (005632 .. 005642, of 34107): |
Subject (001694 .. 001703, of 36359): |
|
s religious philosophical and cultural content The following is a representative |
s religious philosophical and cultural content The following are representative |
| Match 60 (1):
Reference (005683 .. 005696, of 34107): |
Subject (001704 .. 001720, of 36359): |
|
Trial has written that theistic realism or mere creation are defining concepts of the |
a Phillip Johnson has written that theistic realism or mere creation are the defining concepts of the |
| Match 61 (1):
Reference (005698 .. 005717, of 34107): |
Subject (001724 .. 001742, of 36359): |
|
This means that God is objectively real as Creator and recorded in the biological evidence Trial Tr vol 10 Forrest |
This means that God is objectively real as Creator and recorded in the biological evidence 10 80 81 Forrest |
| Match 62 (1):
Reference (005728 .. 005776, of 34107): |
Subject (001745 .. 001793, of 36359): |
|
Phillip Johnson states that the Darwinian theory of evolution contradicts not just the Book of Genesis but every word in the Bible from beginning to end It contradicts the idea that we are here because a creator brought about our existence for a purpose 11 16 17 Forrest P |
Phillip Johnson states that the Darwinian theory of evolution contradicts not just the Book of Genesis but every word in the Bible from beginning to end It contradicts the idea that we are here because a creator brought about our existence for a purpose 11 16 17 Forrest P524 |
| Match 63 (1):
Reference (005781 .. 005794, of 34107): |
Subject (001797 .. 001810, of 36359): |
|
proponents Johnson William Dembski and Charles Thaxton one of the editors of Pandas situate |
proponents Johnson William Dembski and Charles Thaxton one of the editors of Pandas situate |
| Match 64 (1):
Reference (005796 .. 005827, of 34107): |
Subject (001813 .. 001844, of 36359): |
|
in the Book of John in the New Testament of the Bible which begins In the Beginning was the Word and the Word was God 11 18 20 54 55 Forrest P |
in the Book of John in the New Testament of the Bible which begins In the Beginning was the Word and the Word was God 11 18 20 54 55 Forrest P524 |
| Match 65 (1):
Reference (005832 .. 005868, of 34107): |
Subject (001874 .. 001911, of 36359): |
|
357 Dembski has written that ID is a ground clearing operation to allow Christianity to receive serious consideration and Christ is never an addendum to a scientific theory but always a completion 11 50 53 Forrest P |
P357 d Dembski has written that ID is a ground clearing operation to allow Christianity to receive serious consideration and Christ is never an addendum to a scientific theory but always a completion 11 50 53 Forrest P386 |
| Match 66 (1):
Reference (005913 .. 005925, of 34107): |
Subject (001980 .. 001989, of 36359): |
|
Professor Behe remarkably and unmistakably claims that the plausibility of the argument for |
Professor Behe claims that the plausibility of the argument for |
| Match 67 (1):
Reference (005927 .. 005964, of 34107): |
Subject (001992 .. 002026, of 36359): |
|
depends upon the extent to which one believes in the existence of God P 718 at 705 emphasis added As no evidence in the record indicates that any other scientific proposition s validity rests on belief in God |
depends on the extent to which one believes in the existence of God P718 at 705 There is no evidence in the record that any other scientific proposition s validity rests on belief in God |
| Match 68 (1):
Reference (005977 .. 005990, of 34107): |
Subject (002034 .. 002047, of 36359): |
|
s assertion constitutes substantial evidence that in his view as is commensurate with other |
This assertion constitutes substantial evidence that in Professor Behe s view as with the |
| Match 69 (1):
Reference (006021 .. 006041, of 34107): |
Subject (002075 .. 002093, of 36359): |
|
the Wedge Document The Wedge Document developed by the Discovery Institute s Center for Renewal of Science and Culture hereinafter CRSC |
the Wedge Document which was developed by the Discovery Institute s Center for Renewal of Science and Culture CRSC |
| Match 70 (1):
Reference (006041 .. 006052, of 34107): |
Subject (002099 .. 002108, of 36359): |
|
CRSC represents from an institutional standpoint the IDM s goals and objectives |
CRSC represents from an institutional standpoint the goals and objectives |
| Match 71 (1):
Reference (006053 .. 006072, of 34107): |
Subject (002114 .. 002128, of 36359): |
|
much as writings from the Institute for Creation Research did for the earlier creation science movement as discussed in McLean |
much as the Institute for Creation Research did for the earlier creationists discussed in McLean |
| Match 72 (1):
Reference (006083 .. 006095, of 34107): |
Subject (002171 .. 002183, of 36359): |
|
The Wedge Document states in its Five Year Strategic Plan Summary that the |
The Wedge Document states in its Five Year Strategic Plan Summary that the |
| Match 73 (1):
Reference (006097 .. 006116, of 34107): |
Subject (002187 .. 002209, of 36359): |
|
s goal is to replace science as currently practiced with theistic and Christian science P 140 at 6 As posited |
s goal is to replace science as currently practiced with theistic and Christian science P140 at 6 Professor Behe s book Darwin s |
| Match 74 (1):
Reference (006126 .. 006156, of 34107): |
Subject (002253 .. 002283, of 36359): |
|
are to defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral cultural and political legacies and to replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God |
are to defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral cultural and political legacies and to replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God |
| Match 75 (1):
Reference (006165 .. 006174, of 34107): |
Subject (002311 .. 002324, of 36359): |
|
the Wedge Document a program of Christian apologetics to promote |
the Wedge Document the CSRC expressly announces a program of Christian apologetics to promote |
| Match 76 (1):
Reference (006242 .. 006254, of 34107): |
Subject (002338 .. 002350, of 36359): |
|
s religious nature is evident because it involves a supernatural designer The courts |
is religious because it involves a supernatural designer The Edwards and McLean courts |
| Match 77 (1):
Reference (006242 .. 006280, of 34107): |
Subject (002338 .. 002374, of 36359): |
|
s religious nature is evident because it involves a supernatural designer The courts in Edwards and McLean expressly found that this characteristic removed creationism from the realm of science and made it a religious proposition Edwards 482 U S |
is religious because it involves a supernatural designer The Edwards and McLean courts expressly found that this characteristic removed creationism from the realm of science and made it a religious proposition Edwards v Aguillard 482 U S |
| Match 78 (1):
Reference (006293 .. 006302, of 34107): |
Subject (002391 .. 002399, of 36359): |
|
proponents have made abundantly clear that the designer is supernatural |
proponents have made clear that the designer is supernatural |
| Match 79 (1):
Reference (006329 .. 006364, of 34107): |
Subject (002575 .. 002607, of 36359): |
|
he means not designed by the laws of nature and that it is implausible that the designer is a natural entity P 647 at 193 P 718 at 696 700 Second Professor Minnich testified that for |
he means not designed by the laws of nature and that it is implausible that the designer is a natural entity P647 at 193 P718 at 696 700 Professor Minnich testified that for |
| Match 80 (1):
Reference (006366 .. 006381, of 34107): |
Subject (002610 .. 002625, of 36359): |
|
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened so that supernatural |
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened so that supernatural |
| Match 81 (1):
Reference (006399 .. 006416, of 34107): |
Subject (002641 .. 002657, of 36359): |
|
s project to change the ground rules of science to include the supernatural Trial Tr vol 28 Fuller |
s project to change the ground rules of science to include the supernatural 28 20 24 Fuller |
| Match 82 (1):
Reference (006433 .. 006458, of 34107): |
Subject (002409 .. 002436, of 36359): |
|
has concluded that science must be redefined to include the supernatural if religious challenges to evolution are to get a hearing 11 8 15 Forrest P |
s Wedge Strategy concluded that science must be redefined to include the supernatural if religious challenges to evolution are to get a hearing 11 8 15 Forrest P429 |
| Match 83 (1):
Reference (006462 .. 006478, of 34107): |
Subject (002488 .. 002504, of 36359): |
|
agrees that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if |
agrees that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if |
| Match 84 (1):
Reference (006524 .. 006533, of 34107): |
Subject (002666 .. 002675, of 36359): |
|
that there are two kinds of causes natural and intelligent |
that there are two kinds of causes natural and intelligent |
| Match 85 (1):
Reference (006536 .. 006547, of 34107): |
Subject (002678 .. 002688, of 36359): |
|
that intelligent causes are beyond nature P 11 at 6 Professor Haught |
that intelligent causes are beyond nature P11 at 6 Professor Haught |
| Match 86 (1):
Reference (006552 .. 006587, of 34107): |
Subject (002689 .. 002721, of 36359): |
|
the only theologian to testify in this case explained that in Western intellectual tradition non natural causes occupy a space reserved for ultimate religious explanations 9 13 14 Haught Robert Pennock Plaintiffs expert in the philosophy |
the only theologian to testify in this case explained that in Western intellectual tradition non natural causes occupy a space reserved for ultimate religious explanations 9 13 14 Robert Pennock the scientific philosopher |
| Match 87 (1):
Reference (006596 .. 006617, of 34107): |
Subject (002727 .. 002748, of 36359): |
|
that because its basic proposition is that the features of the natural world are produced by a transcendent immaterial non natural being |
that because its basic proposition is that the features of the natural world are produced by a transcendent immaterial non natural being |
| Match 88 (1):
Reference (006619 .. 006638, of 34107): |
Subject (002751 .. 002770, of 36359): |
|
is a religious proposition regardless of whether that religious proposition is given a recognized religious label 5 55 56 Pennock |
is a religious proposition regardless of whether that religious proposition is given a recognized religious label 5 55 56 Pennock |
| Match 89 (1):
Reference (006796 .. 006817, of 34107): |
Subject (002882 .. 002901, of 36359): |
|
FTE as noted whose articles of incorporation and filings with the Internal Revenue Service describe it as a religious Christian organization P |
FTE s Articles of Incorporation and filings with the Internal Revenue Service describe it as a religious Christian organization P461 |
| Match 90 (1):
Reference (006832 .. 006843, of 34107): |
Subject (003061 .. 003072, of 36359): |
|
Pandas was written by Dean Kenyon and Percival Davis both acknowledged creationists |
Pandas was written by Dean Kenyon and Percival Davis both acknowledged creationists |
| Match 91 (1):
Reference (006912 .. 006928, of 34107): |
Subject (003418 .. 003437, of 36359): |
|
points emerge 1 the definition for creation science in early drafts is identical to the definition of |
points emerge from this comparison 1 the definition for creation science in early drafts is identical to the definition of |
| Match 92 (1):
Reference (006953 .. 006977, of 34107): |
Subject (003455 .. 003481, of 36359): |
|
and 3 the changes occurred shortly after the Supreme Court held that creation science is religious and cannot be taught in public school science classes |
and 3 the changes occurred shortly after the Supreme Court held in Edwards that creation science is religious and cannot be taught in public school science classes |
| Match 93 (1):
Reference (007034 .. 007068, of 34107): |
Subject (003531 .. 003567, of 36359): |
|
defined as various forms of life that began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc the very same way in |
defined in these drafts as various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc the same way intelligent |
| Match 94 (1):
Reference (007071 .. 007085, of 34107): |
Subject (003569 .. 003584, of 36359): |
|
is defined in the subsequent published versions P 560 at 210 P 1 at 2 |
is defined in the published versions P560 at 210 P1 at 2 13 P562 at 2 |
| Match 95 (1):
Reference (007103 .. 007117, of 34107): |
Subject (003254 .. 003264, of 36359): |
|
11 at 99 100 P 856 2 This definition was described by many witnesses for |
P11 at 99 100 This was described by many witnesses for |
| Match 96 (1):
Reference (007124 .. 007147, of 34107): |
Subject (003270 .. 003294, of 36359): |
|
Minnich and Fuller as special creation of kinds of animals an inherently religious and creationist concept 28 85 86 Fuller Minnich Dep at 34 |
Minnich and Steven Fuller as special creation of kinds of animals an inherently religious and creationist concept 28 85 86 Fuller Minnich Dep at 34 |
| Match 97 (1):
Reference (007176 .. 007194, of 34107): |
Subject (003314 .. 003333, of 36359): |
|
Professor Behe s assertion that this passage was merely a description of appearances in the fossil record is illogical |
Professor Behe s assertion that this passage was merely a description of appearances in the fossil record is not logical |
| Match 98 (1):
Reference (007206 .. 007219, of 34107): |
Subject (003359 .. 003372, of 36359): |
|
a conclusion about how life began based upon an interpretation of the fossil record |
a conclusion about how life began based on an interpretation of the fossil record |
| Match 99 (1):
Reference (007230 .. 007259, of 34107): |
Subject (003663 .. 003684, of 36359): |
|
The weight of the evidence clearly demonstrates as noted that the systemic change from creation to intelligent design occurred sometime in 1987 after the Supreme Court s important Edwards decision |
The evidence demonstrates that the change from creation to intelligent design occurred sometime in 1987 after the Supreme Court s Edwards decision |
| Match 100 (1):
Reference (007379 .. 007396, of 34107): |
Subject (003934 .. 003952, of 36359): |
|
Dr Forrest testified and sponsored exhibits showing six arguments common to creationists 10 140 48 Forrest P 856 |
Dr Forrest testified and sponsored exhibits showing six arguments common to creationists 10 140 48 Forrest P856 1 6 |
| Match 101 (1):
Reference (007495 .. 007516, of 34107): |
Subject (003955 .. 003976, of 36359): |
|
creationists made the same argument that the complexity of the bacterial flagellum supported creationism as Professors Behe and Minnich now make for |
creationists made the same argument that the complexity of the bacterial flagellum supported creationism as Professors Behe and Minnich now make for |
| Match 102 (1):
Reference (007528 .. 007553, of 34107): |
Subject (003989 .. 004014, of 36359): |
|
openly welcomes adherents to creationism into its Big Tent urging them to postpone biblical disputes like the age of the earth 11 3 15 Forrest P |
openly welcomes adherents to creationism into its Big Tent urging them to postpone biblical disputes like the age of the earth 11 3 15 Forrest P429 |
| Match 103 (1):
Reference (007616 .. 007627, of 34107): |
Subject (004073 .. 004087, of 36359): |
|
is not creationism their testimony was primarily by way of bare assertion |
is not creationism but their testimony on this subject was primarily by way of assertion |
| Match 104 (1):
Reference (007632 .. 007650, of 34107): |
Subject (004092 .. 004110, of 36359): |
|
directly rebut the creationist history of Pandas or other evidence presented by Plaintiffs showing the commonality between creationism and |
directly rebut the creationist history of Pandas or other evidence presented by plaintiffs showing the commonality between creationism and |
| Match 105 (1):
Reference (007662 .. 007686, of 34107): |
Subject (004125 .. 004149, of 36359): |
|
was their assertion that the term creationism applies only to arguments based on the Book of Genesis a young earth and a catastrophic Noaich flood |
was the assertion that the term creationism applies only to arguments based on the Book of Genesis a young earth and a catastrophic Noaich flood |
| Match 106 (1):
Reference (007688 .. 007709, of 34107): |
Subject (004153 .. 004174, of 36359): |
|
substantial evidence established that this is only one form of creationism including the chart that was distributed to the Board Curriculum Committee |
substantial evidence introduced that this is only one form of creationism including the chart that was distributed to the Board Curriculum Committee |
| Match 107 (1):
Reference (007716 .. 007727, of 34107): |
Subject (004175 .. 004187, of 36359): |
|
149 at 2 10 129 32 Forrest P 555 at 22 24 |
P149 at 2 See also 10 129 32 Forrest P555 at 22 24 |
| Match 108 (1):
Reference (008549 .. 008572, of 34107): |
Subject (024650 .. 024673, of 36359): |
|
Standards require students to learn about Darwin s Theory of Evolution and eventually to take a standardized test of which evolution is a part |
standards require students to learn about Darwin s Theory of Evolution and to eventually take a standardized test of which evolution is a part |
| Match 109 (1):
Reference (008638 .. 008649, of 34107): |
Subject (031615 .. 031627, of 36359): |
|
Notably the unrefuted testimony of Plaintiffs scien ce education expert Dr Alters |
o 293 Consequently the testimony of plaintiffs science education expert Dr Brian Alters |
| Match 110 (1):
Reference (008825 .. 008864, of 34107): |
Subject (024684 .. 024723, of 36359): |
|
be tested as new evidence is discovered The Theory is not a fact Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence A theory is defined as a well tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations |
being tested as new evidence is discovered The Theory is not a fact Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence A theory is defined as a well tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations |
| Match 111 (1):
Reference (009139 .. 009165, of 34107): |
Subject (024724 .. 024750, of 36359): |
|
Intelligent Design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin s view The reference book Of Pandas and People is available for students |
Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin s view The reference book Of Pandas and People is available for students |
| Match 112 (1):
Reference (009158 .. 009180, of 34107): |
Subject (010882 .. 010904, of 36359): |
|
Of Pandas and People is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually involves P |
Of Pandas and People is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves P124 |
| Match 113 (1):
Reference (009400 .. 009437, of 34107): |
Subject (024778 .. 024819, of 36359): |
|
any theory students are encouraged to keep an open mind The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life to individual students and their families As a Standards driven district class instruction focuses upon preparing students to |
any theory students are encouraged to keep an open mind The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life up to individual students and their families As a standards driven district class instruction focuses on the standards and preparing students to |
| Match 114 (1):
Reference (010678 .. 010712, of 34107): |
Subject (032968 .. 033001, of 36359): |
|
sets up what will be perceived by students as a God friendly science the one that explicitly mentions an intelligent designer and that the other science evolution takes no position on religion 14 144 45 |
sets up what will be perceived by students as a God friendly science the one that mentions an intelligent designer and that other science evolution that takes no position on religion 14 144 45 |
| Match 115 (1):
Reference (010724 .. 010775, of 34107): |
Subject (033104 .. 033153, of 36359): |
|
tells students quite explicitly choose God on the side of intelligent design or choose atheism on the side of science 2 54 55 Miller Introducing such a religious conflict into the classroom is very dangerous because it forces students to choose between God and science not a choice that schools should be |
tells students quite explicitly choose God on the side of intelligent design or choose atheism on the side of science 2 54 55 Introducing such a religious conflict into the classroom is very dangerous because it forces students to choose between God and science not a choice schools should be |
| Match 116 (1):
Reference (011951 .. 011968, of 34107): |
Subject (033260 .. 033277, of 36359): |
|
Dr Alters rejected Dover s explanation that its curriculum change and the statement implementing it are not teaching |
Dr Alters rejects Dover s explanation that its curriculum change and the statement implementing it are not teaching |
| Match 117 (1):
Reference (012717 .. 012734, of 34107): |
Subject (025218 .. 025233, of 36359): |
|
February 2005 the Board unanimously voted to mail a specialized newsletter to the community Trial Tr vol 15 |
February 2005 the Board unanimously voted to mail a specialized newsletter P127 to the community 15 |
| Match 118 (1):
Reference (012768 .. 012777, of 34107): |
Subject (025246 .. 025255, of 36359): |
|
an aggressive advocacy piece denigrating the scientific theory of evolution |
an aggressive advocacy piece denigrating the scientific theory of evolution |
| Match 119 (1):
Reference (012787 .. 012831, of 34107): |
Subject (025266 .. 025309, of 36359): |
|
under the heading Frequently Asked Questions demeans Plaintiffs for protecting their Constitutional rights as it states A small minority of parents have objected to the recent curriculum change by arguing that the Board has acted to impose its own religious beliefs on students P 127 |
under Frequently Asked Questions the newsletter demeans the Plaintiffs for protecting their Constitutional rights A small minority of parents have objected to the recent curriculum change by arguing that the Board has acted to impose its own religious beliefs on students P127 at 1 |
| Match 120 (1):
Reference (012859 .. 012897, of 34107): |
Subject (025370 .. 025406, of 36359): |
|
suggests that scientists engage in trickery and doublespeak about the theory of evolution by stating The word evolution has several meanings and those supporting Darwin s theory of evolution use that confusion in definition to their advantage Id The |
suggests that scientists engage in trickery and doublespeak about the theory of evolution The word evolution has several meanings and those supporting Darwin s theory of evolution use that confusion in definition to their advantage Id e |
| Match 121 (1):
Reference (012905 .. 012948, of 34107): |
Subject (025415 .. 025460, of 36359): |
|
is a scientific theory on par with evolution and other scientific theories by explaining The theory of intelligent design ID is a scientific theory that differs from Darwin s view and is endorsed by a growing number of credible scientists Id at 2 Evolution |
is a scientific theory on a par with evolution and other scientific theories The theory of intelligent design ID is a scientific theory that differs from Darwin s view and is endorsed by a growing number of credible scientists Id at 2 f It denigrates evolution |
| Match 122 (1):
Reference (012972 .. 013023, of 34107): |
Subject (025479 .. 025530, of 36359): |
|
In simple terms on a molecular level scientists have discovered a purposeful arrangement of parts which cannot be explained by Darwin s theory In fact since the 1950s advances in molecular biology and chemistry have shown us that living cells the fundamental units of life processes cannot be explained by chance Id |
In simple terms on a molecular level scientists have discovered a purposeful arrangement of parts which cannot be explained by Darwin s theory In fact since the 1950s advances in molecular biology and chemistry have shown us that living cells the fundamental units of life processes cannot be explained by chance Id |
| Match 123 (1):
Reference (013026 .. 013051, of 34107): |
Subject (025533 .. 025555, of 36359): |
|
suggests that evolution has atheistic implications by indicating that Some have said that before Darwin we thought a benevolent God had created us Biology took away |
suggests that evolution has atheistic implications Some have said that before Darwin we thought a benevolent God had created us Biology took away |
| Match 124 (1):
Reference (013053 .. 013072, of 34107): |
Subject (025557 .. 025576, of 36359): |
|
status as made in the image of God or Darwinism made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist Id |
status as made in the image of God or Darwinism made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist Id |
| Match 125 (1):
Reference (013087 .. 013122, of 34107): |
Subject (025626 .. 025661, of 36359): |
|
Anthony Flew described as a world famous atheist who now believes in intelligent design as follows My whole life has been guided by the principle of Plato s Socrates Follow the evidence where it leads Id |
Anthony Flew described as a world famous atheist who now believes in intelligent design as follows My whole life has been guided by the principle of Plato s Socrates Follow the evidence where it leads Id |
| Match 126 (1):
Reference (013899 .. 013910, of 34107): |
Subject (026444 .. 026455, of 36359): |
|
Policy The Board s actions from June 2004 through October 18 2004 |
o 263 The Board s actions from June through October 18 2004 |
| Match 127 (1):
Reference (013907 .. 013917, of 34107): |
Subject (022346 .. 022366, of 36359): |
|
through October 18 2004 the date the Board approved the curriculum |
o 224 On October 18 2004 the Board passed by a 6 3 vote a resolution that amended the biology curriculum |
| Match 128 (1):
Reference (013919 .. 013938, of 34107): |
Subject (026456 .. 026475, of 36359): |
|
were consistently reported in news articles in the two local newspapers the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch P |
were consistently reported in news articles in the two local papers the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch P44 |
| Match 129 (1):
Reference (013983 .. 014022, of 34107): |
Subject (026510 .. 026550, of 36359): |
|
they did not attend the 2004 Board meetings that preceded the curriculum change and became aware of the Board s actions only after reading about them in the local newspapers Tammy Kitzmiller Beth Eveland Cindy Sneath Steven Stough and Joel |
the plaintiffs did not attend the 2004 board meetings that preceded the curriculum change and became aware of the Board s actions only after reading about them in the local papers Tammy Kitzmiller Beth Eveland Cindy Sneath Steven Stough and Joel |
| Match 130 (1):
Reference (014024 .. 014042, of 34107): |
Subject (026552 .. 026571, of 36359): |
|
all first learned of the Board s actions regarding the biology curriculum and textbook from the news articles 11 |
all first learned of the Board s actions regarding the biology curriculum and textbook from the news articles 3 114 |
| Match 131 (1):
Reference (014083 .. 014105, of 34107): |
Subject (026633 .. 026655, of 36359): |
|
The news reports in the York newspapers were followed by numerous letters to the editor and editorials published in the same papers P |
The news reports in the York newspapers were followed by numerous letters to the editor and editorials published in the same papers Plaintiffs |
| Match 132 (1):
Reference (014516 .. 014531, of 34107): |
Subject (026753 .. 026768, of 36359): |
|
assertion The York Daily Record published 139 letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions |
a The York Daily Record published 139 letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions |
| Match 133 (1):
Reference (014533 .. 014560, of 34107): |
Subject (026770 .. 026798, of 36359): |
|
eighty six of those letters addressed the issues in religious terms 16 18 20 Stough The York Daily Record published forty three editorials regarding the Board s actions |
Eighty six of those letters addressed the issues in religious terms 16 18 20 Stough b The York Daily Record published forty three editorials regarding the Board s actions |
| Match 134 (1):
Reference (014566 .. 014576, of 34107): |
Subject (026804 .. 026812, of 36359): |
|
editorials addressed the issues in religious terms P 674 16 22 |
editorials addressed the issues in religious terms 16 22 |
| Match 135 (1):
Reference (014578 .. 014595, of 34107): |
Subject (026814 .. 026833, of 36359): |
|
Stough The York Dispatch published eighty six letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions sixty of |
Stough c The York Dispatch published eighty six letters to the editor regarding the Board s actions P672 Sixty of |
| Match 136 (1):
Reference (014597 .. 014618, of 34107): |
Subject (026836 .. 026859, of 36359): |
|
addressed the issue in religious terms 16 24 Stough The York Dispatch published nineteen editorials regarding the Board s actions seventeen of |
addressed the issues in religious terms 16 24 Stough d The York Dispatch published nineteen editorials regarding the Board s actions P675 Seventeen of |
| Match 137 (1):
Reference (014788 .. 014836, of 34107): |
Subject (026706 .. 026752, of 36359): |
|
that members of the Dover community perceived the Board as having acted to promote religion with many citizens lined up as either for the curriculum change on religious grounds or against the curriculum change on the ground that religion should not play a role in public school science class |
that the Dover community perceives the Board as having acted to promote religion with many citizens lined up as either for the curriculum change on religious grounds or against the curriculum change on the grounds that religion should not play a role in public school science class |
| Match 138 (1):
Reference (014857 .. 014870, of 34107): |
Subject (023252 .. 023266, of 36359): |
|
the curriculum change because they demonstrate that r egardless of the listener s support |
the teachers 35 126 Baksa o 230 Baksa testified that the teachers did not support |
| Match 139 (1):
Reference (015339 .. 015351, of 34107): |
Subject (012645 .. 012657, of 36359): |
|
arguments may be true a proposition on which the Court takes no position |
arguments may be true a proposition on which the Court takes no position |
| Match 140 (1):
Reference (015399 .. 015422, of 34107): |
Subject (004533 .. 004552, of 36359): |
|
argument of irreducible complexity central to ID employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980 s and |
argument irreducible complexity employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980 s and |
| Match 141 (1):
Reference (015425 .. 015436, of 34107): |
Subject (004556 .. 004567, of 36359): |
|
s negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community |
s negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community |
| Match 142 (1):
Reference (015453 .. 015478, of 34107): |
Subject (004571 .. 004591, of 36359): |
|
has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community it has not generated peer reviewed publications nor has it been the subject of testing and research |
has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community generate peer reviewed publications or been the subject of testing and research |
| Match 143 (1):
Reference (015483 .. 015541, of 34107): |
Subject (004658 .. 004716, of 36359): |
|
since the scientific revolution of the 16 th and 17 th centuries science has been limited to the search for natural causes to explain natural phenomena 9 19 22 Haught 5 25 29 Pennock 1 62 Miller This revolution entailed the rejection of the appeal to authority and by extension revelation in favor of empirical evidence 5 28 Pennock |
Since the scientific revolution of the 16 th and 17 th centuries science has been limited to the search for natural causes to explain natural phenomena 9 19 22 Haught 5 25 29 Pennock 1 62 Miller This revolution entailed the rejection of the appeal to authority and by extension revelation in favor of empirical evidence 5 28 Pennock |
| Match 144 (1):
Reference (015542 .. 015578, of 34107): |
Subject (004745 .. 004780, of 36359): |
|
Since that time period science has been a discipline in which testability rather than any ecclesiastical authority or philosophical coherence has been the measure of a scientific idea s worth 9 21 22 Haught 1 63 Miller |
since that time science has been a discipline in which testability rather than any ecclesiastical authority or philosophical coherence has been the measure of a scientific idea s worth 9 21 22 Haught 1 63 Miller |
| Match 145 (1):
Reference (015582 .. 015613, of 34107): |
Subject (004788 .. 004819, of 36359): |
|
theological or ultimate explanations for the existence or characteristics of the natural world science does not consider issues of meaning and purpose in the world 9 21 Haught 1 64 87 Miller |
theological or ultimate explanations for the existence or characteristics of the natural world 9 21 Haught Science does not consider issues of meaning and purpose in the world 1 64 87 Miller |
| Match 146 (1):
Reference (015615 .. 015660, of 34107): |
Subject (004822 .. 004870, of 36359): |
|
supernatural explanations may be important and have merit they are not part of science 3 103 Miller 9 19 20 Haught This self imposed convention of science which limits inquiry to testable natural explanations about the natural world is referred to by philosophers as methodological naturalism |
Supernatural explanations are important and may have merit but they are not part of science 3 103 Miller 9 19 20 Haught o 38 This self imposed convention of science which limits inquiry to testable natural explanations about the natural world is referred to by philosophers as methodological naturalism |
| Match 147 (1):
Reference (015665 .. 015675, of 34107): |
Subject (004868 .. 004879, of 36359): |
|
as the scientific method 5 23 29 30 Pennock Methodological naturalism |
as methodological naturalism 5 23 29 30 Pennock o 39 Methodological naturalism |
| Match 148 (1):
Reference (015678 .. 015695, of 34107): |
Subject (004902 .. 004917, of 36359): |
|
ground rule of science today which requires scientists to seek explanations in the world around us based upon |
ground rule of science requires scientists to seek explanations in the world around us based upon |
| Match 149 (1):
Reference (015697 .. 015715, of 34107): |
Subject (004919 .. 004936, of 36359): |
|
we can observe test replicate and verify 1 59 64 2 41 43 Miller 5 8 23 30 Pennock |
we can observe test replicate and verify 1 59 64 2 41 43 Miller 5 23 30 Pennock |
| Match 150 (1):
Reference (015718 .. 015729, of 34107): |
Subject (004954 .. 004964, of 36359): |
|
National Academy of Sciences hereinafter NAS was recognized by experts for both |
National Academy of Sciences NAS was recognized by experts for both |
| Match 151 (1):
Reference (015760 .. 015842, of 34107): |
Subject (005008 .. 005088, of 36359): |
|
NAS is in agreement that science is limited to empirical observable and ultimately testable data Science is a particular way of knowing about the world In science explanations are restricted to those that can be inferred from the confirmable data the results obtained through observations and experiments that can be substantiated by other scientists Anything that can be observed or measured is amenable to scientific investigation Explanations that cannot be based upon empirical evidence are not part of science P 649 at 27 |
NAS agrees that science is limited to empirical observable and ultimately testable data Science is a particular way of knowing about the world In science explanations are restricted to those that can be inferred from the confirmable data the results obtained through observations and experiments that can be substantiated by other scientists Anything that can be observed or measured is amenable to scientific investigation Explanations that cannot be based on empirical evidence are not a part of science P649 at 27 |
| Match 152 (1):
Reference (015843 .. 015852, of 34107): |
Subject (005122 .. 005131, of 36359): |
|
This rigorous attachment to natural explanations is an essential attribute |
This rigorous attachment to natural explanations is an essential attribute |
| Match 153 (1):
Reference (015878 .. 015904, of 34107): |
Subject (005276 .. 005302, of 36359): |
|
from a practical perspective attributing unsolved problems about nature to causes and forces that lie outside the natural world is a science stopper 3 14 15 Miller |
From a practical perspective attributing unsolved problems about nature to causes and forces that lie outside the natural world is a science stopper 3 14 15 Miller |
| Match 154 (1):
Reference (015878 .. 015939, of 34107): |
Subject (005276 .. 005332, of 36359): |
|
from a practical perspective attributing unsolved problems about nature to causes and forces that lie outside the natural world is a science stopper 3 14 15 Miller As Dr Miller explained once you attribute a cause to an untestable supernatural force a proposition that cannot be disproven there is no reason to continue seeking natural explanations as we have our answer Id |
From a practical perspective attributing unsolved problems about nature to causes and forces that lie outside the natural world is a science stopper 3 14 15 Miller Once you attribute a cause to an untestable supernatural force a proposition that cannot be disproven there is no reason to continue seeking natural explanations we have our answer Id |
| Match 155 (1):
Reference (015967 .. 015988, of 34107): |
Subject (005354 .. 005375, of 36359): |
|
takes a natural phenomenon and instead of accepting or seeking a natural explanation argues that the explanation is supernatural 5 107 Pennock |
takes a natural phenomenon and instead of accepting or seeking a natural explanation argues that the explanation is supernatural 5 107 Pennock |
| Match 156 (1):
Reference (016024 .. 016091, of 34107): |
Subject (005407 .. 005473, of 36359): |
|
Darwinists object to the view of intelligent design because it does not give a natural cause explanation of how the various forms of life started in the first place Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive features already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc P 11 at 99 100 emphasis added |
Darwinists object to the view of intelligent design because it does not give a natural cause explanation of how the various forms of life started in the first place Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency with their distinctive feature already intact fish with fins and scales birds with feathers beaks and wings etc P11 at 99 100 Emphasis added |
| Match 157 (1):
Reference (016098 .. 016128, of 34107): |
Subject (005477 .. 005513, of 36359): |
|
animals did not evolve naturally through evolutionary means but were created abruptly by a non natural or supernatural designer Defendants own expert witnesses acknowledged this point 21 96 100 Behe P |
animals did not evolve naturally through evolutionary means but rather were created abruptly by a non natural or supernatural designer o 45 Even defendants own expert witnesses acknowledged this point 21 96 100 Behe see also P718 |
| Match 158 (1):
Reference (016130 .. 016169, of 34107): |
Subject (005519 .. 005557, of 36359): |
|
at 696 700 implausible that the designer is a natural entity 28 21 22 Fuller ID s rejection of naturalism and commitment to supernaturalism 38 95 96 Minnich ID does not exclude the possibility of a supernatural designer including deities |
at 696 700 implausible that the designer is a natural entity 28 21 22 Fuller ID s rejection of naturalism and commitment to supernaturalism 24 38 95 96 Minnich ID does not exclude possibility of supernatural designer including deities |
| Match 159 (1):
Reference (016180 .. 016193, of 34107): |
Subject (002636 .. 002650, of 36359): |
|
that of the IDM itself is to change the ground rules of science to |
that it is intelligent design s project to change the ground rules of science to |
| Match 160 (1):
Reference (016185 .. 016200, of 34107): |
Subject (005571 .. 005586, of 36359): |
|
is to change the ground rules of science to allow supernatural causation of the natural world |
is to change the ground rules of science to allow supernatural causation of the natural world |
| Match 161 (1):
Reference (016252 .. 016262, of 34107): |
Subject (005606 .. 005616, of 36359): |
|
Professor Behe admitted that his broadened definition of science which encompasses |
Professor Behe admitted that his broadened definition of science which encompasses |
| Match 162 (1):
Reference (016264 .. 016282, of 34107): |
Subject (005619 .. 005631, of 36359): |
|
would also embrace astrology 28 26 Fuller 21 37 42 Behe Moreover defense expert Professor Minnich acknowledged that for |
would also embrace astrology 21 37 42 Behe Professor Minnich acknowledged that for |
| Match 163 (1):
Reference (016284 .. 016296, of 34107): |
Subject (002610 .. 002622, of 36359): |
|
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened |
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened |
| Match 164 (1):
Reference (016284 .. 016302, of 34107): |
Subject (005634 .. 005655, of 36359): |
|
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened to allow consideration of supernatural forces |
to be considered science the ground rules of science have to be broadened to allow consideration of supernatural causes 38 97 o |
| Match 165 (1):
Reference (016342 .. 016359, of 34107): |
Subject (005663 .. 005680, of 36359): |
|
leader proclaims that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if |
leader proclaims that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if |
| Match 166 (1):
Reference (016372 .. 016396, of 34107): |
Subject (002534 .. 002557, of 36359): |
|
Indeed entire fields of inquiry including especially in the human sciences will need to be rethought from the ground up in terms of intelligent design |
Indeed entire fields of inquiry including especially the human sciences will need to be rethought from the ground up in terms of intelligent design |
| Match 167 (1):
Reference (016415 .. 016446, of 34107): |
Subject (002254 .. 002285, of 36359): |
|
to defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral cultural and political legacies and replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God P 140 at |
to defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral cultural and political legacies and to replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God P140 at |
| Match 168 (1):
Reference (016455 .. 016466, of 34107): |
Subject (002172 .. 002183, of 36359): |
|
Wedge Document states in its Five Year Strategic Plan Summary that the |
Wedge Document states in its Five Year Strategic Plan Summary that the |
| Match 169 (1):
Reference (016468 .. 016481, of 34107): |
Subject (002187 .. 002200, of 36359): |
|
s goal is to replace science as currently practiced with theistic and Christian science |
s goal is to replace science as currently practiced with theistic and Christian science |
| Match 170 (1):
Reference (016504 .. 016514, of 34107): |
Subject (005799 .. 005810, of 36359): |
|
Notably every major scientific association that has taken a position on |
o 49 Every major scientific association that has taken a position on |
| Match 171 (1):
Reference (016534 .. 016544, of 34107): |
Subject (005825 .. 005835, of 36359): |
|
1 98 99 Miller 14 75 78 Alters 37 25 Minnich |
1 98 99 Miller 14 75 78 Alters 37 25 Minnich |
| Match 172 (1):
Reference (016560 .. 016672, of 34107): |
Subject (005844 .. 005955, of 36359): |
|
as follows Creationism intelligent design and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority revelation or religious belief Documentation offered in support of these claims is typically limited to the special publications of their advocates These publications do not offer hypotheses subject to change in light of new data new interpretations or demonstration of error This contrasts with science where any hypothesis or theory always remains subject to the possibility of rejection or modification in the light of new knowledge P 192 at 25 Additionally |
as follows Creationism intelligent design and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority revelation or religious belief Documentation offered in support of these claims is typically limited to the special publications of their advocates These publications do not offer hypotheses subject to change in light of new data new interpretations or demonstration of error This contrasts with science where any hypothesis or theory always remains subject to the possibility of rejection or modification in the light of new knowledge P192 at 25 National |
| Match 173 (1):
Reference (016672 .. 016683, of 34107): |
Subject (023845 .. 023857, of 36359): |
|
Additionally the American Association for the Advancement of Science hereinafter AAAS the |
National Academy of Sciences the American Association for the Advancement of Science the |
| Match 174 (1):
Reference (016698 .. 016734, of 34107): |
Subject (005999 .. 006035, of 36359): |
|
namely that it has not proposed a scientific means of testing its claims and that the lack of scientific warrant for so called intelligent design theory makes it improper to include as part of science education P |
namely that it has not proposed a scientific means of testing its claims and that the lack of scientific warrant for so called intelligent design theory makes it improper to include as part of science education P198 |
| Match 175 (1):
Reference (016770 .. 016781, of 34107): |
Subject (006078 .. 006089, of 36359): |
|
is not a theory as that term is defined by the NAS |
is not a theory as that term is defined by the NAS |
| Match 176 (1):
Reference (016834 .. 016874, of 34107): |
Subject (006176 .. 006219, of 36359): |
|
meet the essential ground rules that limit science to testable natural explanations 3 101 03 Miller 14 62 Alters Science cannot be defined differently for Dover students than it is defined in the scientific community as an affirmative action program as |
meet the essential ground rules that limit science to testable natural explanations 3 101 03 Miller 14 62 Alters o 56 Science cannot be defined differently for Dover students than it is defined in the scientific community as an affirmative action program for a |
| Match 177 (1):
Reference (016879 .. 016893, of 34107): |
Subject (006218 .. 006232, of 36359): |
|
for a view that has been unable to gain a foothold within the scientific establishment |
for a view that has been unable to gain a foothold within the scientific establishment |
| Match 178 (1):
Reference (016896 .. 016906, of 34107): |
Subject (006235 .. 006244, of 36359): |
|
s fa ilure to meet the ground rules of science is |
s failure to meet the ground rules of science is |
| Match 179 (1):
Reference (016944 .. 016960, of 34107): |
Subject (006277 .. 006291, of 36359): |
|
is at bottom premised upon a false dichotomy namely that to the extent evolutionary theory is discredited |
is premised on a false dichotomy namely that to the extent evolutionary theory is discredited |
| Match 180 (1):
Reference (016987 .. 016998, of 34107): |
Subject (006312 .. 006323, of 36359): |
|
was employed by creationists in the 1980 s to support creation science |
was employed by creationists in the 1980 s to support creation science |
| Match 181 (1):
Reference (017071 .. 017081, of 34107): |
Subject (006334 .. 006344, of 36359): |
|
today than it was to justify creation science two decades ago |
today than it was to justify creation science two decades ago |
| Match 182 (1):
Reference (017083 .. 017094, of 34107): |
Subject (006349 .. 006364, of 36359): |
|
proponents primarily argue for design through negative arguments against evolution as illustrated |
proponents primarily argue for design through negative argument against evolution including Professor Behe s argument that |
| Match 183 (1):
Reference (017096 .. 017130, of 34107): |
Subject (006360 .. 006394, of 36359): |
|
Professor Behe s argument that irreducibly complex systems cannot be produced through Darwinian or any natural mechanisms 5 38 41 Pennock 1 39 2 15 2 35 37 3 96 Miller 16 72 73 Padian |
Professor Behe s argument that irreducibly complex systems cannot be produced through Darwinian or any natural mechanisms 5 38 41 Pennock 1 39 2 15 2 35 37 3 96 Miller 16 72 73 Padian |
| Match 184 (1):
Reference (017150 .. 017179, of 34107): |
Subject (006662 .. 006693, of 36359): |
|
just because scientists cannot explain today how biological systems evolved does not mean that they cannot and will not be able to explain them tomorrow 2 36 37 Miller As |
Just because scientists cannot explain today how biological systems evolved does not mean they cannot and will not be able to explain them tomorrow 2 36 37 Miller In Dr Padian s |
| Match 185 (1):
Reference (017184 .. 017193, of 34107): |
Subject (006695 .. 006704, of 36359): |
|
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence 17 45 |
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence 17 45 |
| Match 186 (1):
Reference (017207 .. 017234, of 34107): |
Subject (006714 .. 006741, of 36359): |
|
examples where Pandas asserted that no natural explanations exist and in some cases that none could exist and yet natural explanations have been identified in the intervening years |
examples where Pandas asserted that no natural explanations exist and in some cases that none could exist and yet natural explanations have been identified in the intervening years |
| Match 187 (1):
Reference (017244 .. 017260, of 34107): |
Subject (006773 .. 006789, of 36359): |
|
just because scientists cannot explain every evolutionary detail does not undermine its validity as a scientific theory |
Just because scientists cannot explain every evolutionary detail does not undermine its validity as a scientific theory |
| Match 188 (1):
Reference (017276 .. 017305, of 34107): |
Subject (006969 .. 007000, of 36359): |
|
of irreducible complexity is ID s alleged scientific centerpiece Irreducible complexity is a negative argument against evolution not proof of design a point conceded by defense expert Professor Minnich 2 |
o 64 Irreducible complexity intelligent design s alleged scientific centerpiece is simply a negative argument against evolution not proof of design 2 15 Miller a point conceded by Professor Minnich 38 82 |
| Match 189 (1):
Reference (017310 .. 017325, of 34107): |
Subject (006998 .. 007015, of 36359): |
|
Minnich irreducible complexity is not a test of intelligent design it s a test of evoluti |
Minnich 38 82 irreducible complexity is not a test of intelligent design it s a test of evolution |
| Match 190 (1):
Reference (017349 .. 017492, of 34107): |
Subject (007043 .. 007181, of 36359): |
|
irreducible complexity as defined by Professor Behe in his book Darwin s Black Box and subsequently modified in his 2001 article entitled Reply to My Critics appears as follows By irreducibly complex I mean a single system which is composed of several well matched interacting parts that contribute to the basic function wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning An irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly by slight successive modifications of a precursor system because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional Since natural selection can only choose systems that are already working then if a biological system cannot be produced gradually it would have to arise as an integrated unit in one fell swoop for natural selection to have anything to act on P |
Irreducible complexity was defined by Professor Behe in Darwin s Black Box and modified in his 2001 article Reply to My Critics as follows By irreducibly complex I mean a single system which is composed of several well matched interacting parts that contribute to the basic function wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning An irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly by slight successive modifications of a precursor system because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional Since natural selection can only choose systems that are already working then if a biological system cannot be produced gradually it would have to arise as an integrated unit in one fell swoop for natural selection to have anything to act on P647 |
| Match 191 (1):
Reference (017494 .. 017543, of 34107): |
Subject (007188 .. 007240, of 36359): |
|
at 39 P 718 at 694 Professor Behe admitted in Reply to My Critics that there was a defect in his view of irreducible complexity because while it purports to be a challenge to natural selection it does not actually address the task facing natural selection P 718 at 695 |
at 39 Free Press 1996 P718 at 694 o 66 Professor Behe admitted in Reply to My Critics that there was a defect in his view of irreducible complexity because while it purports to be a challenge to natural selection it does not actually address the task facing natural selection P718 at 695 |
| Match 192 (1):
Reference (017494 .. 017600, of 34107): |
Subject (007188 .. 007296, of 36359): |
|
at 39 P 718 at 694 Professor Behe admitted in Reply to My Critics that there was a defect in his view of irreducible complexity because while it purports to be a challenge to natural selection it does not actually address the task facing natural selection P 718 at 695 Professor Behe specifically explained that t he current definition puts the focus on removing a part from an already functioning system but t he difficult task facing Darwinian evolution however would not be to remove parts from sophisticated pre existing systems it would be to bring together components to make a new system in the first place |
at 39 Free Press 1996 P718 at 694 o 66 Professor Behe admitted in Reply to My Critics that there was a defect in his view of irreducible complexity because while it purports to be a challenge to natural selection it does not actually address the task facing natural selection P718 at 695 Specifically Behe explained that t he current definition puts the focus on removing a part from an already functioning system but t he difficult task facing Darwinian evolution however would not be to remove parts from sophisticated pre existing systems it would be to bring together components to make a new system in the first place |
| Match 193 (1):
Reference (017602 .. 017617, of 34107): |
Subject (007300 .. 007315, of 36359): |
|
In that article Professor Behe wrote that he hoped to repair this defect in future work |
In that article Professor Behe wrote that he hoped to repair this defect in future work |
| Match 194 (1):
Reference (017642 .. 017660, of 34107): |
Subject (007326 .. 007344, of 36359): |
|
s admitted failure to properly address the very phenomenon that irreducible complexity purports to place at issue natural selection |
This admitted failure to properly address the very phenomenon that irreducible complexity purports to place at issue natural selection |
| Match 195 (1):
Reference (017666 .. 017687, of 34107): |
Subject (007361 .. 007380, of 36359): |
|
that Professor Behe s concept of irreducible complexity depends on ignoring ways in which evolution is known to occur Although Professor Behe |
that Professor Behe s concept of irreducible complexity depends on ignoring ways in which evolution is known to occur Behe |
| Match 196 (1):
Reference (017689 .. 017714, of 34107): |
Subject (007382 .. 007407, of 36359): |
|
adamant in his definition of irreducible complexity when he says a precursor missing a part is by definition nonfunctional what he obviously means is that it |
adamant that in his definition of irreducible complexity when he says a precursor missing a part is by definition nonfunctional what he means is that it |
| Match 197 (1):
Reference (017716 .. 017730, of 34107): |
Subject (007409 .. 007422, of 36359): |
|
not function in the same way the system functions when all the parts are present |
t function in the way the system functions when all the parts are present |
| Match 198 (1):
Reference (017775 .. 017787, of 34107): |
Subject (007448 .. 007467, of 36359): |
|
in some other way for example as a secretory system 19 88 95 |
in some other way for example in the case of the bacterial flagellum as a secretory system 19 88 95 |
| Match 199 (1):
Reference (017794 .. 017812, of 34107): |
Subject (007471 .. 007489, of 36359): |
|
qualification on what is meant by irreducible complexity renders it meaningless as a criticism of evolution 3 40 Miller |
qualification on what is meant by irreducible complexity renders it meaningless as a criticism of evolution 3 40 Miller |
| Match 200 (1):
Reference (017813 .. 017900, of 34107): |
Subject (007605 .. 007692, of 36359): |
|
In fact the theory of evolution proffers exaptation as a well recognized well documented explanation for how systems with multiple parts could have evolved through natural means Exaptation means that some precursor of the subject system had a different selectable function before experiencing the change or addition that resulted in the subject system with its present function 16 146 48 Padian For instance Dr Padian identified the evolution of the mammalian middle ear bones from what had been jawbones as an example of this process 17 6 17 |
In fact the theory of evolution has a well recognized well documented explanation for how systems with multiple parts could have evolved through natural means namely exaptation Exaptation means that some precursor of the subject system had a different selectable function before experiencing the change or addition that resulted in the subject system with its present function 16 146 48 Padian For instance Dr Padian identified the evolution of the mammalian middle ear bones from what had been jawbones as an example of this process 17 6 17 |
| Match 201 (1):
Reference (017902 .. 017923, of 34107): |
Subject (007785 .. 007805, of 36359): |
|
By defining irreducible complexity in the way that he has Professor Behe attempts to exclude the phenomenon of exaptation by definitional fiat |
By defining irreducible complexity in the way he has Professor Behe attempts to exclude the phenomenon of exaptation by definitional fiat |
| Match 202 (1):
Reference (017938 .. 017948, of 34107): |
Subject (007831 .. 007840, of 36359): |
|
has rejected Professor Behe s claim for irreducible complexity by using |
has rejected Professor Behe s claim for irreducible complexity using |
| Match 203 (1):
Reference (017952 .. 018024, of 34107): |
Subject (007843 .. 007915, of 36359): |
|
reasoning S tructures and processes that are claimed to be irreducibly complex typically are not on closer inspection For example it is incorrect to assume that a complex structure or biochemical process can function only if all its components are present and functioning as we see them today Complex biochemical systems can be built up from simpler systems through natural selection Thus the history of a protein can be traced through simpler organisms |
reasoning S tructures and processes that are claimed to be irreducibly complex typically are not on closer inspection For example it is incorrect to assume that a complex structure or biochemical process can function only if all its components are present and functioning as we see them today Complex biochemical systems can be built up from simpler systems through natural selection Thus the history of a protein can be traced through simpler organisms |
| Match 204 (1):
Reference (018025 .. 018102, of 34107): |
Subject (007935 .. 008011, of 36359): |
|
The evolution of complex molecular systems can occur in several ways Natural selection can bring together parts of a system for one function at one time and then at a later time recombine those parts with other systems of components to produce a system that has a different function Genes can be duplicated altered and then amplified through natural selection The complex biochemical cascade resulting in blood clotting has been explained in this fashion P 192 at 22 |
The evolution of complex molecular systems can occur in several ways Natural selection can bring together parts of a system for one function at one time and then at a later time recombine those parts with other systems of components to produce a system that has a different function Genes can be duplicated altered and then amplified through natural selection The complex biochemical cascade resulting in blood clotting has been explained in this fashion P192 at 22 |
| Match 205 (1):
Reference (018105 .. 018144, of 34107): |
Subject (008077 .. 008115, of 36359): |
|
complexity is only a negative argument against evolution it is refutable and accordingly testable unlike ID by showing that there are intermediate structures with selectable functions that could have evolved into the allegedly irreducibly complex systems 2 15 16 Miller |
it is only a negative argument against evolution irreducible complexity unlike intelligent design is testable by showing that there are intermediate structures with selectable functions that could have evolved into the allegedly irreducibly complex systems 2 15 16 Miller |
| Match 206 (1):
Reference (018151 .. 018164, of 34107): |
Subject (008120 .. 008129, of 36359): |
|
negative argument of irreducible complexity is testable does not make testable the argument for |
negative argument is testable does not make the argument for |
| Match 207 (1):
Reference (018171 .. 018200, of 34107): |
Subject (008012 .. 008036, of 36359): |
|
Pennock Professor Behe has applied the concept of irreducible complexity to only a few select systems 1 the bacterial flagellum 2 the blood clotting cascade and 3 the immune system |
o 71 Professor Behe has applied irreducible complexity only to a few select systems the bacterial flagellum the blood clotting cascade and the immune system |
| Match 208 (1):
Reference (018220 .. 018231, of 34107): |
Subject (008140 .. 008152, of 36359): |
|
however Dr Miller presented evidence based upon peer reviewed studies that they |
o 73 Dr Miller presented evidence based on peer reviewed studies that the |
| Match 209 (1):
Reference (018245 .. 018275, of 34107): |
Subject (008173 .. 008204, of 36359): |
|
Dr Miller pointed to peer reviewed studies that identified a possible precursor to the bacterial flagellum a subsystem that was fully functional namely the Type III Secretory System 2 8 20 |
Dr Miller pointed to peer reviewed studies that identified a possible pre cursor to the bacterial flagellum a subsystem that was fully functional namely the Type III Secretory System 2 8 20 |
| Match 210 (1):
Reference (018285 .. 018326, of 34107): |
Subject (008212 .. 008252, of 36359): |
|
Professor Minnich admited that there is serious scientific research on the question of whether the bacterial flagellum evolved into the Type III Secretary System the Type III Secretory System into the bacterial flagellum or whether they both evolved from a common ancestor |
Professor Minnich admits that there is serious scientific research on the question of whether the bacterial flagellum evolved into the Type III Secretory System the Type III Secretory System into the bacterial flagellum or they both evolved from a common ancestor |
| Match 211 (1):
Reference (018347 .. 018381, of 34107): |
Subject (008268 .. 008300, of 36359): |
|
testified about his research as follows we re looking at the function of these systems and how they could have been derived one from the other And it s a legitimate scientific inquiry 38 16 |
testified about this research we re looking at the function of these systems and how they could have been derived one from the other And it s a legitimate scientific inquiry 38 16 |
| Match 212 (1):
Reference (018391 .. 018410, of 34107): |
Subject (008374 .. 008393, of 36359): |
|
Dr Miller demonstrated that the alleged irreducible complexity of the blood clotting cascade has been disproven by peer reviewed studies |
Dr Miller demonstrated that the alleged irreducible complexity of the blood clotting cascade has been disproven by peer reviewed studies |
| Match 213 (1):
Reference (018412 .. 018442, of 34107): |
Subject (008395 .. 008425, of 36359): |
|
back to 1969 which show that dolphins and whales blood clots despite missing a part of the cascade a study that was confirmed by molecular testing in 1998 1 122 29 |
back to 1969 which showed that dolphins and whales blood clots despite missing a part of the cascade a study that was confirmed by molecular testing in 1998 1 122 29 |
| Match 214 (1):
Reference (018412 .. 018475, of 34107): |
Subject (008395 .. 008454, of 36359): |
|
back to 1969 which show that dolphins and whales blood clots despite missing a part of the cascade a study that was confirmed by molecular testing in 1998 1 122 29 Miller P 854 17 854 22 Additionally and more recently scientists published studies showing that in puffer fish blood clots despite the cascade missing not only one but three parts 1 128 29 |
back to 1969 which showed that dolphins and whales blood clots despite missing a part of the cascade a study that was confirmed by molecular testing in 1998 1 122 29 P854 17 854 22 More recently scientists published studies showing that in puffer fish blood clots despite the cascade missing not only one but three parts 1 128 29 |
| Match 215 (1):
Reference (018478 .. 018498, of 34107): |
Subject (008457 .. 008476, of 36359): |
|
scientists in peer reviewed publications have refuted Professor Behe s predication about the alleged irreducible complexity of the blood clotting cascade |
scientists in peer reviewed publications have refuted Behe s prediction about the alleged irreducible complexity of the blood clotting cascade |
| Match 216 (1):
Reference (018515 .. 018527, of 34107): |
Subject (008505 .. 008520, of 36359): |
|
designed to avoid peer reviewed scientific evidence that falsifies his argument as it |
designed to avoid peer reviewed scientific evidence that falsifies his argument not a scientifically warranted redefinition |
| Match 217 (1):
Reference (018515 .. 018533, of 34107): |
Subject (008505 .. 008520, of 36359): |
|
designed to avoid peer reviewed scientific evidence that falsifies his argument as it was not a scientifically warranted redefinition |
designed to avoid peer reviewed scientific evidence that falsifies his argument not a scientifically warranted redefinition |
| Match 218 (1):
Reference (018600 .. 018618, of 34107): |
Subject (008525 .. 008545, of 36359): |
|
However Dr Miller presented peer reviewed studies refuting Professor Behe s claim that the immune system was irreducibly complex |
o 76 Dr Miller also presented peer reviewed studies refuting Professor Behe s claim that the immune system was irreducibly complex |
| Match 219 (1):
Reference (018619 .. 018641, of 34107): |
Subject (008641 .. 008663, of 36359): |
|
Between 1996 and 2002 various studies confirmed each element of the evolutionary hypothesis explaining the origin of the immune system 2 31 Miller |
between 1996 and 2005 various studies confirmed each element of the evolutionary hypothesis explaining the origin of the immune system 2 31 Miller |
| Match 220 (1):
Reference (018619 .. 018650, of 34107): |
Subject (008641 .. 008672, of 36359): |
|
Between 1996 and 2002 various studies confirmed each element of the evolutionary hypothesis explaining the origin of the immune system 2 31 Miller In fact on cross examination Professor Behe was questioned |
between 1996 and 2005 various studies confirmed each element of the evolutionary hypothesis explaining the origin of the immune system 2 31 Miller o 77 On cross examination Professor Behe was questioned |
| Match 221 (1):
Reference (018652 .. 018668, of 34107): |
Subject (008674 .. 008690, of 36359): |
|
his 1996 claim that science would never find an evolutionary explanation for the immune system He was |
his 1996 claim that science would never find an evolutionary explanation for the immune system He was |
| Match 222 (1):
Reference (018670 .. 018689, of 34107): |
Subject (008692 .. 008713, of 36359): |
|
with fifty eight peer reviewed publications nine books and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system |
with the fifty eight peer reviewed publications nine books and several immunology text book chapters about the evolution of the immune system |
| Match 223 (1):
Reference (018691 .. 018711, of 34107): |
Subject (008724 .. 008741, of 36359): |
|
he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution and that it was not good enough 23 19 |
he insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution it was not good enough 23 19 |
| Match 224 (1):
Reference (018722 .. 018737, of 34107): |
Subject (008751 .. 008763, of 36359): |
|
argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution |
argument depends on setting a burden of proof for the theory of evolution |
| Match 225 (1):
Reference (018746 .. 018761, of 34107): |
Subject (008779 .. 008794, of 36359): |
|
proposed by both Professors Behe and Minnich is to grow the bacterial flagellum in the laboratory |
proposed by both Professors Behe and Minnich is to grow the bacterial flagellum in the laboratory |
| Match 226 (1):
Reference (018793 .. 018802, of 34107): |
Subject (008823 .. 008832, of 36359): |
|
that the proposed test could not approximate real world conditions |
that the proposed test could not approximate real world conditions |
| Match 227 (1):
Reference (018812 .. 018822, of 34107): |
Subject (008841 .. 008851, of 36359): |
|
it would merely be a test of evolution not design 22 |
it would be merely a test of evolution not design 2 |
| Match 228 (1):
Reference (018836 .. 018867, of 34107): |
Subject (008879 .. 008908, of 36359): |
|
Professor Behe s claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large 17 45 46 Padian 3 99 Miller |
Professor Behe s claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community 17 45 46 Padian 3 99 Miller |
| Match 229 (1):
Reference (018869 .. 018881, of 34107): |
Subject (008910 .. 008922, of 36359): |
|
even if irreducible complexity had not been rejected it still does not support |
even if irreducible complexity had not been rejected it still does not support |
| Match 230 (1):
Reference (018884 .. 018898, of 34107): |
Subject (008941 .. 008952, of 36359): |
|
it is merely a test for evolution not design 2 15 2 35 40 Miller |
complexity is merely a test for evolution not design 2 15 Miller |
| Match 231 (1):
Reference (018930 .. 019038, of 34107): |
Subject (009120 .. 009231, of 36359): |
|
is the purposeful arrangement of parts Professor Behe summarized the argument as follows We infer design when we see parts that appear to be arranged for a purpose The strength of the inference is quantitative the more parts that are arranged the more intricately they interact the stronger is our confidence in design The appearance of design in aspects of biology is overwhelming Since nothing other than an intelligent cause has been demonstrated to be able to yield such a strong appearance of design Darwinian claims notwithstanding the conclusion that the design seen in life is real design is rationally justified 18 90 91 18 109 10 Behe 37 |
is in the purposeful arrangement of parts o 83 Professor Behe summarized the argument as follows We infer design when we see parts that appear to be arranged for a purpose The strength of the inference is quantitative the more parts that are arranged and the more intricately they interact the stronger is our confidence in design The appearance of design in aspects of biology is overwhelming Since nothing other than an intelligent cause has been demonstrated to be able to yield such a strong appearance of design Darwinian claims notwithstanding the conclusion that the design seen in life is real design is rationally justified 18 90 91 Behe slides at 7 |
| Match 232 (1):
Reference (019048 .. 019061, of 34107): |
Subject (009249 .. 009262, of 36359): |
|
a restatement of the Reverend William Paley s argument applied at the cell level |
a restatement of the Reverend William Paley s argument applied at the cell level |
| Match 233 (1):
Reference (019062 .. 019103, of 34107): |
Subject (009270 .. 009312, of 36359): |
|
Minnich Behe and Paley reach the same conclusion that complex organisms must have been designed using the same reasoning except that Professors Behe and Minnich refuse to identify the designer whereas Paley inferred from the presence of design that it was God |
Minnich Minnich Behe and Paley reach the same conclusion that complex organisms must have been designed using the same reasoning except that Professors Behe and Minnich refuse to identify the designer whereas Paley inferred from the presence of design that it was God |
| Match 234 (1):
Reference (019126 .. 019137, of 34107): |
Subject (009326 .. 009336, of 36359): |
|
Professor Behe can never be ruled out 2 40 Miller 22 101 |
Professor Behe admitted it can never be ruled out 22 101 |
| Match 235 (1):
Reference (019144 .. 019166, of 34107): |
Subject (009345 .. 009367, of 36359): |
|
assertion that design of biological systems can be inferred from the purposeful arrangement of parts is based upon an analogy to human design |
assertion that design of biological systems can be inferred from the purposeful arrangement of parts is based on an analogy to human design |
| Match 236 (1):
Reference (019167 .. 019177, of 34107): |
Subject (009372 .. 009382, of 36359): |
|
Because we are able to recognize design of artifacts and objects |
because we are able to recognize design of artifacts and objects |
| Match 237 (1):
Reference (019182 .. 019204, of 34107): |
Subject (009383 .. 009406, of 36359): |
|
that same reasoning can be employed to determine biological design 18 116 17 23 50 Behe Professor Behe testified that the strength of |
that same reasoning can be employed to determine biological design 18 116 17 23 50 o 87 Professor Behe testified that the strength of |
| Match 238 (1):
Reference (019204 .. 019217, of 34107): |
Subject (009400 .. 009419, of 36359): |
|
of the analogy depends upon the degree of similarity entailed in the two propositions |
Professor Behe testified that the strength of an analogy depends on the degree of similarity entailed in the two propositions |
| Match 239 (1):
Reference (019225 .. 019264, of 34107): |
Subject (009429 .. 009471, of 36359): |
|
completely fails Unlike biological systems human artifacts do not live and reproduce over time They are non replicable they do not undergo genetic recombination and they are not driven by natural selection 1 131 33 Miller 23 57 59 Behe |
completely fails o 88 Unlike biological systems human artifacts do not live and reproduce over deep time They are non replicable they don t undergo genetic recombination and they are not driven by natural selection 1 131 33 Miller 23 57 59 Behe |
| Match 240 (1):
Reference (019265 .. 019279, of 34107): |
Subject (009529 .. 009542, of 36359): |
|
For human artifacts we know the designer s identity human and the mechanism of design |
For human artifacts we know the designer s identity human the mechanism of design |
| Match 241 (1):
Reference (019281 .. 019293, of 34107): |
Subject (009544 .. 009556, of 36359): |
|
we have experience based upon empirical evidence that humans can make such things |
we have experience based on empirical evidence that humans can make such things |
| Match 242 (1):
Reference (019312 .. 019323, of 34107): |
Subject (009571 .. 009582, of 36359): |
|
1 131 33 Miller 23 63 Behe 5 55 58 Pennock With |
1 131 33 Miller 23 63 Behe 5 55 58 Pennock With |
| Match 243 (1):
Reference (019327 .. 019353, of 34107): |
Subject (009587 .. 009612, of 36359): |
|
that they refuse to propose hypotheses on the designer s identity do not propose a mechanism and the designer he she it they has never been seen |
that they refuse to propose hypotheses on the designer s identity do not propose a mechanism and he she it or they has never been seen |
| Match 244 (1):
Reference (019359 .. 019373, of 34107): |
Subject (009613 .. 009628, of 36359): |
|
Professor Minnich agreed that in the case of human artifacts and objects we know the |
Professor Minnich agreed that in the case of human artifacts and objects we know who the |
| Match 245 (1):
Reference (019381 .. 019410, of 34107): |
Subject (009638 .. 009662, of 36359): |
|
but we do not know any of those attributes for the designer of biological life 38 44 47 Minnich In addition Professor Behe agreed that for the design of human |
but that we don t know any of those attributes for the designer of biological life 38 44 47 Professor Behe agreed that for human |
| Match 246 (1):
Reference (019419 .. 019436, of 34107): |
Subject (009680 .. 009697, of 36359): |
|
and we have a baseline for human design that does not exist for design of biological systems 23 |
and we have a baseline for human design that does not exist for design of biological systems 23 |
| Match 247 (1):
Reference (019438 .. 019463, of 34107): |
Subject (009699 .. 009722, of 36359): |
|
73 Behe Professor Behe s only response to these seemingly insurmountable points of disanalogy was that the inference still works in science fiction movies 23 73 |
73 Professor Behe s only response to these insurmountable points of disanalogy was that the inference still works in science fiction movies 23 73 |
| Match 248 (1):
Reference (019473 .. 019492, of 34107): |
Subject (009726 .. 009745, of 36359): |
|
the only attribute of design that biological systems appear to share with human artifacts is their complex appearance i e |
the only attribute of design that biological systems share with human artifacts is their complex appearance if it looks complex |
| Match 249 (1):
Reference (019473 .. 019506, of 34107): |
Subject (009726 .. 009755, of 36359): |
|
the only attribute of design that biological systems appear to share with human artifacts is their complex appearance i e if it looks complex or designed it must have been designed 23 73 Behe |
the only attribute of design that biological systems share with human artifacts is their complex appearance if it looks complex or designed it must have been designed 23 73 Behe |
| Match 250 (1):
Reference (019507 .. 019533, of 34107): |
Subject (009833 .. 009861, of 36359): |
|
This inference to design based upon the appearance of a purposeful arrangement of parts is a completely subjective proposition determined in the eye of each beholder and |
This inference to design based on the appearance of a purposeful arrangement of parts is a completely subjective proposition determined in the eye of each beholder Both Behe and |
| Match 251 (1):
Reference (019545 .. 019593, of 34107): |
Subject (009856 .. 009906, of 36359): |
|
Professors Behe and Minnich assert that there is a quantitative aspect to the inference on cross examination they admitted that there is no quantitative criteria for determining the degree of complexity or number of parts that bespeak design rather than a natural process 23 50 Behe 38 59 Minnich |
of each beholder Both Behe and Minnich asserted that there is a quantitative aspect to the inference but on cross examination admitted there is no quantitative criteria for determining the degree of complexity or number of parts that bespeak design rather than a natural process 23 50 Behe 38 59 Minnich |
| Match 252 (1):
Reference (019602 .. 019617, of 34107): |
Subject (009910 .. 009928, of 36359): |
|
the entire trial only one piece of evidence generated by Defendants addressed the strength of the |
the entire trial there was only one piece of evidence generated by defendants that addressed the strength of the |
| Match 253 (1):
Reference (019619 .. 019646, of 34107): |
Subject (009931 .. 009958, of 36359): |
|
inference the argument is less plausible to those for whom God s existence is in question and is much less plausible for those who deny God s existence |
inference the argument is less plausible to those for whom God s existence is in question and is much less plausible for those who deny God s existence |
| Match 254 (1):
Reference (019658 .. 019677, of 34107): |
Subject (009985 .. 010004, of 36359): |
|
does not satisfy the ground rules of science which require testable hypotheses based upon natural explanations 3 101 03 Miller |
does not satisfy the ground rules of science which require testable hypotheses based on natural explanations 3 101 03 Miller |
| Match 255 (1):
Reference (019681 .. 019705, of 34107): |
Subject (010008 .. 010034, of 36359): |
|
upon forces acting outside of the natural world forces that we cannot see replicate control or test which have produced changes in this world While |
on forces acting outside the natural world forces that we cannot see replicate control or test which have produced changes in this world 3 101 Miller While |
| Match 256 (1):
Reference (019715 .. 019741, of 34107): |
Subject (010058 .. 010084, of 36359): |
|
they are simply not testable by scientific means and therefore cannot qualify as part of the scientific process or as a scientific theory 3 101 02 Miller |
they are not testable by science and therefore cannot qualify as part of the scientific process or as a scientific hypothesis or theory 3 101 02 Miller |
| Match 257 (1):
Reference (019760 .. 019812, of 34107): |
Subject (010105 .. 010161, of 36359): |
|
that evolutionary theory cannot account for life s complexity by pointing to real gaps in scientific knowledge which indisputably exist in all scientific theories but also by misrepresenting well established scientific propositions 1 112 1 122 1 136 37 Miller 16 74 79 17 45 46 Padian Before discussing Defendants claims about evolution |
that evolutionary theory cannot account for life s complexity by pointing not only to real gaps in scientific knowledge which indisputably exist in all scientific theories but also by misrepresenting well established scientific propositions 1 112 1 122 1 136 37 Miller 16 74 79 17 45 46 Padian o 94 Before discussing defendants claims about evolution |
| Match 258 (1):
Reference (019818 .. 019830, of 34107): |
Subject (010171 .. 010183, of 36359): |
|
overwhelming number of scientists as reflected by every scientific association that has spoken |
overwhelming number of scientists as reflected by every scientific association that has spoken |
| Match 259 (1):
Reference (019843 .. 019856, of 34107): |
Subject (010331 .. 010348, of 36359): |
|
Plaintiffs expert in biology Dr Miller a widely recognized biology professor at Brown University |
plaintiffs expert in biology explained evolutionary theory Dr Miller is a widely recognized biology professor at Brown University |
| Match 260 (1):
Reference (019884 .. 019900, of 34107): |
Subject (010703 .. 010720, of 36359): |
|
overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community and that every major scientific association agrees 1 94 100 Miller |
overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community and that every major scientific association agrees 1 94 100 See e |
| Match 261 (1):
Reference (019945 .. 019957, of 34107): |
Subject (010796 .. 010810, of 36359): |
|
in original Despite the scientific community s overwhelming support for evolution Defendants and |
living world o 101 Despite the scientific community s overwhelming support for evolution defendants and |
| Match 262 (1):
Reference (019959 .. 019977, of 34107): |
Subject (010813 .. 010830, of 36359): |
|
proponents insist that evolution is unsupported by empirical evidence Plaintiffs science experts Drs Miller and Padian clearly explained how |
proponents insist that evolution is unsupported by empirical evidence Plaintiffs science experts Drs Miller and Padian explained how |
| Match 263 (1):
Reference (019979 .. 019994, of 34107): |
Subject (010833 .. 010848, of 36359): |
|
proponents generally and Pandas specifically distort and misrepresent scientific knowledge in making their anti evolution argument |
proponents generally and Pandas specifically distort and misrepresent scientific knowledge in making the anti evolution argument |
| Match 264 (1):
Reference (020040 .. 020060, of 34107): |
Subject (010926 .. 010949, of 36359): |
|
of arguments against evolutionary theory found in Pandas involve paleontology which studies the life of the past and the fossil record |
of the arguments against evolutionary theory in Of Pandas and People involve paleontology which studies the life of the past and the fossil record |
| Match 265 (1):
Reference (020063 .. 020076, of 34107): |
Subject (010956 .. 010969, of 36359): |
|
Professor Padi an was the only testifying expert witness with any expertise in paleontology |
Professor Kevin Padian was the only testifying expert witness with any expertise in paleontology |
| Match 266 (1):
Reference (020084 .. 020097, of 34107): |
Subject (011132 .. 011143, of 36359): |
|
Padian s demonstrative slides pr epared on the basis of peer reviewing scientific literature |
a series of demonstrative slides prepared based on peer reviewed scientific literature |
| Match 267 (1):
Reference (020099 .. 020108, of 34107): |
Subject (011147 .. 011160, of 36359): |
|
how Pandas systematically distorts and misrepresents established important evolutionary principles |
how Of Pandas and People systematically distorts and misrepresents established and important evolutionary principles |
| Match 268 (1):
Reference (020119 .. 020145, of 34107): |
Subject (011163 .. 011189, of 36359): |
|
Pandas misrepresents the dominant form of understanding relationships between organisms namely the tree of life represented by classification determined via the method of cladistics 16 87 97 |
Pandas misrepresents the dominant form of understanding relationships between organisms namely the tree of life represented by classification determined via the method of cladistics 16 87 97 |
| Match 269 (1):
Reference (020148 .. 020162, of 34107): |
Subject (011191 .. 011205, of 36359): |
|
855 6 855 19 Second Pandas misrepresents homology the central concept of comparative biology that |
P855 6 855 19 Pandas also misrepresents homology the central concept of comparative biology that |
| Match 270 (1):
Reference (020188 .. 020204, of 34107): |
Subject (011230 .. 011248, of 36359): |
|
Pandas fails to address the well established biological concept of exaptation which involves a structure changing function |
Pandas fails to address at all the well established biological concept of exaptation which involves a structure changing function |
| Match 271 (1):
Reference (020207 .. 020220, of 34107): |
Subject (011250 .. 011263, of 36359): |
|
fish fins evolving fingers and bones to become legs for weight bearing land animals |
fish fins evolving fingers and bones to become legs for weight bearing land animals |
| Match 272 (1):
Reference (020233 .. 020251, of 34107): |
Subject (011298 .. 011316, of 36359): |
|
address exaptation because they deny that organisms change function which is a view necessary to support abrupt appearance Id |
address exaptation because they deny that organisms change function a view necessary to support the abrupt appearance argument Id |
| Match 273 (1):
Reference (020253 .. 020273, of 34107): |
Subject (011319 .. 011340, of 36359): |
|
Dr Padian s unrebutted testimony demonstrates that Pandas distorts and misrepresents evidence in the fossil record about pre Cambrian era fossils |
Dr Padian s unrebutted testimony also demonstrates that Pandas distorts and misrepresents evidence in the fossil record about pre Cambrian era fossils |
| Match 274 (1):
Reference (020295 .. 020305, of 34107): |
Subject (011392 .. 011400, of 36359): |
|
and the evolution of whales from land animals 16 107 17 |
and the evolution of whales from land animals 17 |
| Match 275 (1):
Reference (020358 .. 020373, of 34107): |
Subject (011544 .. 011559, of 36359): |
|
Dr Miller testified that Pandas treatment of biochemical similarities between organisms is inaccurate and downright false |
Dr Miller testified that Pandas treatment of biochemical similarities between organisms is inaccurate and downright false |
| Match 276 (1):
Reference (020376 .. 020386, of 34107): |
Subject (011576 .. 011587, of 36359): |
|
how Pandas misrepresents basic molecular biology concepts to advance design theory |
how Pandas misrepresents basic molecular biology concepts to advance the design theory |
| Match 277 (1):
Reference (020398 .. 020417, of 34107): |
Subject (011589 .. 011605, of 36359): |
|
example that he testified as to how Pandas misinforms readers on the standard evolutionary relationships between different types of animals |
example he testified how Pandas misinforms readers on the standard evolutionary relationships between different types of animals |
| Match 278 (1):
Reference (020452 .. 020464, of 34107): |
Subject (011621 .. 011634, of 36359): |
|
Dr Miller refuted Pandas claim that evolution cannot account for new genetic information |
Dr Miller also refuted Pandas claim that evolution cannot account for new genetic information |
| Match 279 (1):
Reference (020466 .. 020488, of 34107): |
Subject (011637 .. 011659, of 36359): |
|
pointed to more than three dozen peer reviewed scientific publications showing the origin of new genetic information by evolutionary processes 1 133 36 |
pointed to more than three dozen peer reviewed scientific publications showing the origin of new genetic information by evolutionary processes 1 133 36 |
| Match 280 (1):
Reference (020466 .. 020504, of 34107): |
Subject (011637 .. 011673, of 36359): |
|
pointed to more than three dozen peer reviewed scientific publications showing the origin of new genetic information by evolutionary processes 1 133 36 Miller P 245 In summary Dr Miller testified that Pandas misrepresents molecular biology and genetic principles |
pointed to more than three dozen peer reviewed scientific publications showing the origin of new genetic information by evolutionary processes 1 133 36 P245 In sum Dr Miller testified that Pandas misrepresents molecular biology and genetics principles |
| Match 281 (1):
Reference (020508 .. 020534, of 34107): |
Subject (011675 .. 011701, of 36359): |
|
the current state of scientific knowledge in those areas in order to teach readers that common descent and natural selection are not scientifically sound 1 139 42 |
the current state of scientific knowledge in those areas in order to teach readers that common descent and natural selection are not scientifically sound 1 139 42 |
| Match 282 (1):
Reference (020536 .. 020554, of 34107): |
Subject (011770 .. 011788, of 36359): |
|
Accordingly the one textbook to which the Dover ID Policy directs students contains outdated concepts and badly flawed science |
o 111 In sum the one textbook to which the Dover policy directs students contains badly flawed and scientifically |
| Match 283 (1):
Reference (020571 .. 020586, of 34107): |
Subject (011818 .. 011833, of 36359): |
|
has failed to demonstrate scientific warrant is the complete absence of peer reviewed publications supporting the |
has failed to demonstrate scientific warrant is the complete absence of peer reviewed publications supporting the |
| Match 284 (1):
Reference (020592 .. 020602, of 34107): |
Subject (011833 .. 011843, of 36359): |
|
the peer review process is exquisitely important in the scientific process |
the concept Peer review is exquisitely important in the scientific process |
| Match 285 (1):
Reference (020604 .. 020638, of 34107): |
Subject (011849 .. 011883, of 36359): |
|
is a way for scientists to write up their empirical research and to share the work with fellow experts in the field opening up the hypotheses to study testing and criticism 1 66 69 Miller |
is a way for scientists to write up their empirical research and to share the work with fellow experts in the field opening up the hypotheses to study testing and criticism 1 66 69 Miller |
| Match 286 (1):
Reference (020642 .. 020652, of 34107): |
Subject (012075 .. 012087, of 36359): |
|
expert Professor Behe recognizes the importance of the peer review process |
expert Professor Behe recognizes the importance to science of the peer review process |
| Match 287 (1):
Reference (020654 .. 020663, of 34107): |
Subject (012091 .. 012100, of 36359): |
|
has written that science must publish or perish 22 19 |
has written that science must publish or perish 22 19 |
| Match 288 (1):
Reference (020666 .. 020722, of 34107): |
Subject (011884 .. 011945, of 36359): |
|
Peer review helps to ensure that research papers are scientifically accurately meet the standards of the scientific method and are relevant to other scientists in the field 1 39 40 Miller Moreover peer review involves scientists submitting a manuscript to a scientific journal in the field journal editors soliciting critical reviews from other experts in the field |
Peer review helps to ensure that research papers are scientifically accurate meet the standards of the scientific method and are relevant and interesting to other scientists in the field 1 39 40 Miller o 113 Peer review involves scientists submitting a manuscript to a scientific journal in the field The journal editors will solicit critical reviews from other experts in the field |
| Match 289 (1):
Reference (020724 .. 020742, of 34107): |
Subject (011948 .. 011966, of 36359): |
|
deciding whether the scientist has followed proper research procedures employed up to date methods considered and cited relevant literature |
decide whether the scientist has followed proper research procedures employed up to date methods considered and cited relevant literature |
| Match 290 (1):
Reference (020743 .. 020752, of 34107): |
Subject (011973 .. 011982, of 36359): |
|
and generally whether the researcher has employed sound science The |
and generally whether the researcher has employed sound science The |
| Match 291 (1):
Reference (020761 .. 020772, of 34107): |
Subject (012304 .. 012315, of 36359): |
|
is not supported by any peer reviewed research data or publications Both |
is not supported by any peer reviewed research data or publications Both |
| Match 292 (1):
Reference (020774 .. 020795, of 34107): |
Subject (012317 .. 012338, of 36359): |
|
Padian and Forrest testified that recent literature reviews of scientific and medical electronic databases disclosed no studies supporting a biological concept of |
Padian and Forrest testified that recent literature reviews of scientific and medical electronic databases disclosed no studies supporting a biological concept of |
| Match 293 (1):
Reference (020806 .. 020847, of 34107): |
Subject (012354 .. 012393, of 36359): |
|
cross examination Professor Behe admitted that There are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred 22 22 23 Behe |
cross examination admitted that There are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred 22 22 23 Behe |
| Match 294 (1):
Reference (020855 .. 020898, of 34107): |
Subject (012400 .. 012443, of 36359): |
|
no peer reviewed papers supporting his claims that complex molecular systems like the bacterial flagellum the blood clotting cascade and the immune system were intelligently designed 21 61 62 complex molecular systems 23 4 5 immune system and 22 124 25 blood clotting cascade |
no peer reviewed papers supporting his claims that complex molecular systems like the bacterial flagellum the blood clotting cascade and the immune system were intelligently designed 21 61 62 complex molecular systems 23 4 5 immune system and 22 124 25 blood clotting cascade |
| Match 295 (1):
Reference (020903 .. 020927, of 34107): |
Subject (012447 .. 012470, of 36359): |
|
there are no peer reviewed articles supporting Professor Behe s argument that certain complex molecular structures are irreducibly complex 17 21 62 22 124 25 |
there are no peer reviewed articles supporting Professor Behe s argument that certain complex molecular structures are irreducibly complex 21 62 22 124 25 |
| Match 296 (1):
Reference (020941 .. 020957, of 34107): |
Subject (012562 .. 012578, of 36359): |
|
also features no scientific research or testing 28 114 15 Fuller 18 22 23 105 06 Behe |
also features no scientific research or testing 28 114 115 Fuller 18 22 23 105 106 Behe |
| Match 297 (1):
Reference (021005 .. 021024, of 34107): |
Subject (012602 .. 012621, of 36359): |
|
has failed to publish in peer reviewed journals engage in research and testing and gain acceptance in the scientific community |
has failed to publish in peer reviewed journals engage in research and testing and gain acceptance in the scientific community |
| Match 298 (1):
Reference (021409 .. 021429, of 34107): |
Subject (019222 .. 019242, of 36359): |
|
10Two exhibit numbers separated by a slash indicates that Plaintiffs introduced different formats of the same article under different exhibit numbers |
4Two exhibit numbers separated by a slash indicates that Plaintiffs introduced different formats of the same article under different exhibit numbers |
| Match 299 (1):
Reference (021432 .. 021474, of 34107): |
Subject (026588 .. 026631, of 36359): |
|
Stough testified that he read the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch every day including on the internet while he was away on vacation to follow the Board s actions relating to the biology curriculum change 15 112 13 16 4 Stough |
Stough testified he read the York Daily Record and the York Dispatch every day including on the Internet while he was away on vacation to follow the Board s actions relating to the change to the biology curriculum 15 112 113 16 4 o |
| Match 300 (1):
Reference (021918 .. 021927, of 34107): |
Subject (011058 .. 011067, of 36359): |
|
no evidence that either Defendants testifying experts or any other |
no evidence that either defendants testifying experts or any other |
| Match 301 (1):
Reference (021946 .. 021968, of 34107): |
Subject (011078 .. 011099, of 36359): |
|
they have published peer reviewed literature or presented such information at scientific conferences on paleontology or the fossil record 17 15 16 Padian |
they have not published peer reviewed literature or presented at scientific conferences on paleontology or the fossil record 17 15 16 Padian |
| Match 302 (1):
Reference (022026 .. 022037, of 34107): |
Subject (012471 .. 012481, of 36359): |
|
17The one article referenced by both Professors Behe and Minnich as supporting |
The one article referenced by Professors Behe and Minnich as supporting |
| Match 303 (1):
Reference (022044 .. 022063, of 34107): |
Subject (012484 .. 012503, of 36359): |
|
Behe and Snoke entitled Simulating evolution by gene duplication of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues P 721 |
Behe and Snoke Simulating evolution by gene duplication of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues Protein Science P721 |
| Match 304 (1):
Reference (022095 .. 022121, of 34107): |
Subject (012520 .. 012546, of 36359): |
|
did not rule out many known evolutionary mechanisms and that the research actually might support evolutionary pathways if a biologically realistic population size were used 22 41 |
did not rule out many known evolutionary mechanisms and that the research actually might support evolutionary pathways if a biologically realistic population size were used 22 41 |
| Match 305 (1):
Reference (022815 .. 022845, of 34107): |
Subject (012790 .. 012826, of 36359): |
|
of nine seats The nine members of the Board in 2004 were Alan Bonsell William Buckingham Sheila Harkins Jane Cleaver Heather Geesey Angie Yingling Noel Wenrich Jeff Brown and Casey Brown |
o 123 There are nine seats on the Board The nine members of the Board in 2004 were Alan Bonsell William Buckingham Sheila Harkins Jane Cleaver Heather Geesey Angie Yingling Noel Wenrich Jeff Brown and Casey Brown |
| Match 306 (1):
Reference (022846 .. 022855, of 34107): |
Subject (012836 .. 012844, of 36359): |
|
Wenrich and Cleaver resigned on October 4 2004 Casey and |
Wenrich and Cleaver resigned on October 4 2004 and |
| Match 307 (1):
Reference (022854 .. 022863, of 34107): |
Subject (012827 .. 012837, of 36359): |
|
Casey and Jeff Brown resigned on October 18 2004 and |
Casey and Jeff Brown resigned on October 18 2004 Wenrich and |
| Match 308 (1):
Reference (022862 .. 022879, of 34107): |
Subject (012843 .. 012859, of 36359): |
|
2004 and Yingling resigned verbally in November 2004 and in writing February 2005 Trial Tr vol 34 Harkins |
2004 and Yingling resigned verbally in November 2004 and in writing in February 2004 34 113 Harkins |
| Match 309 (1):
Reference (022902 .. 022917, of 34107): |
Subject (012879 .. 012893, of 36359): |
|
President he appointed Buckingham to be Chair of the Board s Curriculum Committee 32 86 87 |
President he appointed William Buckingham Chair of the Board s Curriculum Committee 32 86 87 |
| Match 310 (1):
Reference (022915 .. 022924, of 34107): |
Subject (012909 .. 012918, of 36359): |
|
32 86 87 Bonsell 34 39 Harkins As Board President |
32 86 87 Bonsell 34 39 Harkins As Board President |
| Match 311 (1):
Reference (022926 .. 022940, of 34107): |
Subject (012920 .. 012936, of 36359): |
|
also served as an ex officio member of the Curriculum Committee 32 116 Bonsell a |
also served as an ex officio member of the Curriculum Committee 32 116 Bonsell o 125 Plaintiff |
| Match 312 (1):
Reference (022950 .. 022973, of 34107): |
Subject (013819 .. 013845, of 36359): |
|
Interest to Inject Religion into the Dover Schools The Board held a retreat on January 9 2002 several weeks after Bonsell joined the Board |
Interest in Injecting Religion Into the Dover Schools o 135 The Board held a retreat on January 9 2002 just several weeks after Bonsell joined the Board |
| Match 313 (1):
Reference (022974 .. 022988, of 34107): |
Subject (013871 .. 013883, of 36359): |
|
Superintendent Nilsen s contemporaneous notes reveal that Bonsell identified creationism as his number one issue |
Superintendent Nilsen s contemporaneous notes Bonsell identified creationism as his number one issue |
| Match 314 (1):
Reference (023063 .. 023077, of 34107): |
Subject (013989 .. 014004, of 36359): |
|
issue of interest as reflected in Dr Nilsen s contemporaneous notes 35 50 53 Baksa |
issues of interest as reflected in P25 Dr Nilsen s contemporaneous notes 35 50 53 Baksa |
| Match 315 (1):
Reference (023135 .. 023153, of 34107): |
Subject (014037 .. 014055, of 36359): |
|
Recalled Bonsell say at the March 26 2003 retreat that he felt creationism belonged in biology class alongside evolution |
recalled Bonsell saying at the March 26 2003 retreat that he felt creationism belong in biology class alongside evolution |
| Match 316 (1):
Reference (023165 .. 023184, of 34107): |
Subject (014073 .. 014092, of 36359): |
|
the March 26 2003 retreat reveal that Bonsell said he wanted creationism taught 50 50 with evolution in biology class |
the March 26 2003 board retreat Bonsell said that he wanted creationism taught 50 50 with evolution in biology class |
| Match 317 (1):
Reference (023186 .. 023218, of 34107): |
Subject (014179 .. 014211, of 36359): |
|
fact Trudy Peterman then principal of Dover High School sent a memo to Assistant Superintendent Baksa and Science Department Chair Bertha Spahr with a copy sent to Dr Nilsen on April 1 2003 |
a memo that Trudy Peterman then the principal of Dover High School sent to Assistant Superintendent Baksa and Science Department Chair Bertha Spahr with a copy to Superintendent Nilsen on April 1 2003 |
| Match 318 (1):
Reference (023220 .. 023252, of 34107): |
Subject (014213 .. 014247, of 36359): |
|
memo reports that Peterman learned from Spahr that Baksa said on March 31 2003 that an unidentified Board member wanted fifty percent of the topic of evolution to involve the teaching of Creationism |
memo reports that Peterman learned from Spahr that Baksa had said on March 31 2003 that an unidentified board member wanted fifty percent 50 of the topic of evolution to involve the teaching of Creationism |
| Match 319 (1):
Reference (023300 .. 023312, of 34107): |
Subject (014158 .. 014174, of 36359): |
|
in Superintendent Nilsen s contemporaneous note that Bonsell raised the issue of creationism |
find corroboration not only in P25 Nilsen s contemporaneous note that Bonsell raised the issue of creationism |
| Match 320 (1):
Reference (023320 .. 023357, of 34107): |
Subject (014248 .. 014288, of 36359): |
|
Additionally Spahr confirmed that she had a conversation with Baksa as reported in the Peterman memo and that Baksa told her Bonsell wanted to have creationism share equal time with evolution in the curriculum 13 72 73 Spahr |
o 140 Spahr confirmed that she had a conversation with Baksa as reported in the Peterman memo P26 and that Baksa told her that Bonsell wanted to have creationism share equal time with evolution in the curriculum 13 72 73 Spahr |
| Match 321 (1):
Reference (023359 .. 023396, of 34107): |
Subject (014291 .. 014330, of 36359): |
|
Baksa confirmed that he had a conversation with Spahr as reported in the Peterman memo in which he told her that Bonsell was looking for a 50 50 split with Darwin and some alternative 35 53 56 Baksa |
Baksa also confirmed that he had a conversation with Spahr as reported in the Peterman memo P26 in which he told her that Bonsell was looking for a 50 50 split with Darwin and some alternative 35 53 56 Baksa |
| Match 322 (1):
Reference (023398 .. 023419, of 34107): |
Subject (014351 .. 014369, of 36359): |
|
Baksa claims he does not recall Bonsell identifying creationism as the subject with which he wanted to share equal time with evolution |
Baksa does not recall is Bonsell identifying creationism as the subject he wanted to share equal time with evolution |
| Match 323 (1):
Reference (023421 .. 023432, of 34107): |
Subject (014377 .. 014391, of 36359): |
|
that Bonsell mentioned creationism at any time up until April 1 2003 |
that he cannot recall Bonsell mentioning creationism at any time up until April 1 2003 |
| Match 324 (1):
Reference (023449 .. 023458, of 34107): |
Subject (014331 .. 014343, of 36359): |
|
Bonsell is clearly the unnamed Board member referred to in |
Bonsell is thus without a doubt the unnamed board member referred to in |
| Match 325 (1):
Reference (023452 .. 023463, of 34107): |
Subject (028643 .. 028655, of 36359): |
|
the unnamed Board member referred to in Peterman s memo who wanted |
the board member referred to in the Trudy Peterman memo P26 who wanted |
| Match 326 (1):
Reference (023463 .. 023476, of 34107): |
Subject (014233 .. 014247, of 36359): |
|
wanted fifty percent of the topic of evolution to involve the teaching of creationism |
wanted fifty percent 50 of the topic of evolution to involve the teaching of Creationism |
| Match 327 (1):
Reference (023487 .. 023512, of 34107): |
Subject (014589 .. 014613, of 36359): |
|
of creationism on numerous other occasions as well When he ran for the Board in 2001 Bonsell told Jeff Brown he did not believe in evolution |
of creationism on numerous other occasions a When he ran for the Board in 2001 Bonsell told Jeff Brown he did not believe in evolution |
| Match 328 (1):
Reference (023514 .. 023525, of 34107): |
Subject (014615 .. 014626, of 36359): |
|
he wanted creationism taught side by side with evolution in biology class |
he wanted creationism taught side by side with evolution in biology classes |
| Match 329 (1):
Reference (023528 .. 023538, of 34107): |
Subject (014632 .. 014642, of 36359): |
|
taking prayer and Bible reading out of school was a mistake |
taking prayer and Bible reading out of school was a mistake |
| Match 330 (1):
Reference (023540 .. 023587, of 34107): |
Subject (014644 .. 014695, of 36359): |
|
he wanted reinstated in the Dover public schools 8 48 49 J Brown Subsequently Bonsell told Jeff Brown he wanted to be on the Board Curriculum Committee because he had concerns about teaching evolution and he wanted to see some changes in that area 8 55 J Brown |
he wanted it reinstated in the Dover public schools 8 48 49 J Brown b Later Bonsell told Jeff Brown he wanted to be on the Board Curriculum Committee because he had concerns about the teaching of evolution and he wanted to see some changes in that area 8 55 J Brown |
| Match 331 (1):
Reference (023589 .. 023607, of 34107): |
Subject (014697 .. 014718, of 36359): |
|
Nilsen complained to Jeff Brown that each Board President had a new set of priorities and Bonsell s priority |
Nilsen complained to Jeff Brown that each Board President had a new set of priorities and Bonsell had creationism as his priority |
| Match 332 (1):
Reference (023668 .. 023691, of 34107): |
Subject (014850 .. 014871, of 36359): |
|
Bonsell not only wanted prayer in schools and creationism taught in science class he also wanted to inject religion into the social studies curriculum |
Bonsell not only wanted prayer in schools and creationism in science class he wanted to inject religion into the social studies curriculum |
| Match 333 (1):
Reference (023697 .. 023709, of 34107): |
Subject (014873 .. 014886, of 36359): |
|
to Baksa that he wanted students to learn more about the Founding Fathers |
told Baksa that he wanted the students to learn more about the Founding Fathers |
| Match 334 (1):
Reference (023714 .. 023728, of 34107): |
Subject (014897 .. 014909, of 36359): |
|
a book entitled Myth of Separation by David Barton 22 36 14 15 17 Baksa |
a book entitled Myth of Separation by David Barton 36 14 15 Baksa |
| Match 335 (1):
Reference (023732 .. 023746, of 34107): |
Subject (015216 .. 015234, of 36359): |
|
Fall 2003 Bonsell Confronted Teachers About Evolution Shortly after Baksa took a position with the |
Fall 2003 Bonsell Confronted the Teachers About Evolution o 151 Beginning shortly after Baksa took a position with the |
| Match 336 (1):
Reference (023748 .. 023774, of 34107): |
Subject (015239 .. 015265, of 36359): |
|
in the fall of 2002 he and Bonsell then Chair of the Board Curriculum Committee had discussions in which Bonsell expressed concern about the teaching of evolution |
in the fall of 2002 he and Bonsell then Chair of the Board Curriculum Committee had discussions in which Bonsell expressed concern about the teaching of evolution |
| Match 337 (1):
Reference (023787 .. 023797, of 34107): |
Subject (015313 .. 015323, of 36359): |
|
felt that Darwin was presented as a fact not a theory |
felt that Darwin was presented as a fact not a theory |
| Match 338 (1):
Reference (023804 .. 023820, of 34107): |
Subject (015416 .. 015434, of 36359): |
|
Baksa Prior to the fall of 2003 Baksa discussed Bonsell s evolu tionary concerns with the teachers |
Baksa o 153 Prior to the fall of 2003 Baksa discussed Bonsell s concerns about evolution with the teachers |
| Match 339 (1):
Reference (023823 .. 023844, of 34107): |
Subject (015464 .. 015488, of 36359): |
|
s problem with the teach ing of the origin of life by which Bonsell meant how species change into other species aspects |
Bonsell had a problem with the teachers teaching the origin of life by which Bonsell meant how species change into other species also known as |
| Match 340 (1):
Reference (023878 .. 023889, of 34107): |
Subject (015622 .. 015633, of 36359): |
|
Jennifer Miller the senior biology teacher acted as spokesperson for the teachers |
Jennifer Miller the senior biology teacher acted as spokesperson for the teachers |
| Match 341 (1):
Reference (023916 .. 023958, of 34107): |
Subject (015666 .. 015710, of 36359): |
|
to students in opposition to what parents presented at home leaving students with the impression that somebody is lying 12 111 J Miller Miller explained that evolution is taught as change over time with emphasis upon origin of species not origin of life |
to the students in opposition to what parents presented at home leaving students with the impression that somebody is lying 12 111 J Miller Miller explained that the teachers taught evolution as change over time with emphasis on origin of species not origin of life |
| Match 342 (1):
Reference (023977 .. 024016, of 34107): |
Subject (015796 .. 015835, of 36359): |
|
because the concept of common ancestry offends his personal religious belief that God created man and other species in the forms they now exist and that the earth is only thousands of years old 33 54 58 115 Bonsell Prior |
because the concept of common ancestry offends his personal religious belief that God created man and other species in the forms they now exist and that the earth is only thousands of years old 33 54 58 115 Bonsell o |
| Match 343 (1):
Reference (024015 .. 024037, of 34107): |
Subject (015898 .. 015922, of 36359): |
|
Bonsell Prior to the fall of 2003 no Dover administrator or Board member had ever met with the biology teachers and questioned them |
o 158 Prior to the fall of 2003 no Dover administrator or board member had ever met with the biology teachers and questioned how they |
| Match 344 (1):
Reference (024015 .. 024044, of 34107): |
Subject (015898 .. 015928, of 36359): |
|
Bonsell Prior to the fall of 2003 no Dover administrator or Board member had ever met with the biology teachers and questioned them as to how they taught evolution or |
o 158 Prior to the fall of 2003 no Dover administrator or board member had ever met with the biology teachers and questioned how they taught evolution 36 75 Linker o |
| Match 345 (1):
Reference (024084 .. 024095, of 34107): |
Subject (015973 .. 015983, of 36359): |
|
before the meeting with Bonsell biology teacher Robert Linker had a practice |
o 160 After the meeting with Bonsell Linker changed his practice |
| Match 346 (1):
Reference (024097 .. 024107, of 34107): |
Subject (015947 .. 015959, of 36359): |
|
explaining that creationism was based on Bibles religion and Biblical writings |
in biology class that creationism was based on Bibles religion and Biblical writings |
| Match 347 (1):
Reference (024097 .. 024120, of 34107): |
Subject (015947 .. 015972, of 36359): |
|
explaining that creationism was based on Bibles religion and Biblical writings noting that it was illegal to discuss creation in public school 36 83 |
in biology class that creationism was based on Bibles religion and Biblical writings and that it was illegal to discuss creationism in public school 36 83 |
| Match 348 (1):
Reference (024147 .. 024168, of 34107): |
Subject (016008 .. 016030, of 36359): |
|
stop using helpful Discovery Channel evolution videos as teaching aides 36 82 85 Linker Linker testified that he changed his practices in |
stopped using helpful Discovery Channel videos as teaching aides 36 82 85 Linker testified that he changed his practice because the unusual meeting |
| Match 349 (1):
Reference (024171 .. 024190, of 34107): |
Subject (016027 .. 016051, of 36359): |
|
because the unusual meeting with Bonsell alerted him to a controversy surrounding how he taught evolution 36 84 85 Linker |
because the unusual meeting with board member Bonsell had alerted him to a controversy surrounding how he taught evolution 36 84 85 o 161 Linker |
| Match 350 (1):
Reference (024171 .. 024197, of 34107): |
Subject (016027 .. 016060, of 36359): |
|
because the unusual meeting with Bonsell alerted him to a controversy surrounding how he taught evolution 36 84 85 Linker Linker additionally testified that Jen Miller a |
because the unusual meeting with board member Bonsell had alerted him to a controversy surrounding how he taught evolution 36 84 85 o 161 Linker also testified that other biology teacher Jen Miller changed |
| Match 351 (1):
Reference (024199 .. 024228, of 34107): |
Subject (016056 .. 016087, of 36359): |
|
biology teacher changed her practice of having the students create an evolution time line in the hallway which addressed how various species developed over millions of years 36 86 87 |
biology teacher Jen Miller changed her practices of having the students create an evolution time line in the hallway which addressed how various species developed over millions of years 36 86 87 |
| Match 352 (1):
Reference (024291 .. 024309, of 34107): |
Subject (016093 .. 016111, of 36359): |
|
the Discovery Institute At some point before June 2004 Seth Cooper an attorney with the Discovery Institute contacted Buckingham |
the Discovery Institute o 162 Sometime before June 2004 Seth Cooper an attorney with the Discovery Institute contacted Buckingham |
| Match 353 (1):
Reference (024310 .. 024320, of 34107): |
Subject (016130 .. 016139, of 36359): |
|
and two subsequent calls occurred between the Discovery Institute and Buckingham |
and two subsequent calls between the Discovery Institute and Buckingham |
| Match 354 (1):
Reference (024310 .. 024322, of 34107): |
Subject (016130 .. 016139, of 36359): |
|
and two subsequent calls occurred between the Discovery Institute and Buckingham Although Buckingham |
and two subsequent calls between the Discovery Institute and Buckingham |
| Match 355 (1):
Reference (024346 .. 024360, of 34107): |
Subject (016182 .. 016192, of 36359): |
|
and Cooper discussed the legality of teaching ID and gaps in Darwin s theory 29 |
and the legalities of teaching gaps in Darwin s theory 29 |
| Match 356 (1):
Reference (024380 .. 024423, of 34107): |
Subject (016228 .. 016274, of 36359): |
|
to Nilsen to give the science teachers 29 130 131 Buckingham 25 100 01 Nilsen 26 114 15 Baksa Late in the 2003 04 school year Baksa arranged for the science teachers to watch a video from the Discovery Institute entitled Icons of Evolution |
to Nilsen to give to the science teachers 29 131 Buckingham 25 100 101 Nilsen 26 114 115 Baksa o 164 Sometime late in the 2003 04 school year Baksa arranged for the science teachers to watch a video from the Discovery Institute entitled Icons of Evolution |
| Match 357 (1):
Reference (024429 .. 024444, of 34107): |
Subject (016292 .. 016309, of 36359): |
|
two lawyers from the Discovery Institute made a legal presentation to the Board in executive session |
two lawyers from the Discovery Institute came and made a legal presentation to the Board in executive session |
| Match 358 (1):
Reference (024462 .. 024472, of 34107): |
Subject (000322 .. 000336, of 36359): |
|
June 2003 to June 2004 Board Delayed Purchasing the Biology Textbook |
June 2003 to June 2004 The Board Held Up the Purchase of the Biology Textbook |
| Match 359 (1):
Reference (024472 .. 024487, of 34107): |
Subject (016336 .. 016352, of 36359): |
|
Textbook In June 2003 the Board approved funds for new science textbooks including a biology textbook |
o 166 In June 2003 the Board approved funds for new science textbooks including a biology textbook |
| Match 360 (1):
Reference (024488 .. 024499, of 34107): |
Subject (016490 .. 016498, of 36359): |
|
the 2002 edition of Biology written by Plaintiffs lead expert Kenneth Miller |
the 2002 edition of Biology written by Kenneth Miller |
| Match 361 (1):
Reference (024532 .. 024543, of 34107): |
Subject (016514 .. 016525, of 36359): |
|
that as of June 2004 the Board was delaying approval of Biology |
that as of June 2004 the Board was delaying approval of Biology |
| Match 362 (1):
Reference (024544 .. 024586, of 34107): |
Subject (016532 .. 016575, of 36359): |
|
because of the book s treatment of evolution and the fact that it did not cover any alternatives to the theory of evolution 29 33 34 Buckingham e June 2004 Board Meetings Buckingham and Other Board Members Spoke in Favor of Teaching Creationism |
because of the book s treatment of evolution and the fact that it did not cover any alternatives to the theory of evolution 29 33 34 Buckingham G June 2004 Board Meetings Buckingham and Other Board Members Spoke Out in Favor of Teaching Creationism |
| Match 363 (1):
Reference (024587 .. 024600, of 34107): |
Subject (016592 .. 016606, of 36359): |
|
Plaintiffs introduced evidence that at public school board meetings held on June 7 2004 |
plaintiffs introduced evidence that at public board meetings held on June 7 and 14 2004 |
| Match 364 (1):
Reference (024602 .. 024670, of 34107): |
Subject (016602 .. 016675, of 36359): |
|
June 14 2004 members of the Board spoke openly in favor of teaching creationism and disparaged the theory of evolution on religious grounds On these important points Plaintiffs introduced the testimony of Plaintiffs Fred and Barrie Callahan Bryan and Christy Rehm Beth Eveland former school Board members Casey and Jeff Brown and William Buckingham teachers Bertha Spahr and Jennifer Miller and newspaper reporters Heidi Bernhard Bubb and Joseph Maldonado |
June 7 and 14 2004 members of the Board spoke openly in favor of teaching creationism and disparaged the theory of evolution on religious grounds o 171 On these important points the plaintiffs introduced the testimony of plaintiffs Fred and Barrie Callahan Bryan and Christy Rehm Beth Eveland former school board members Casey and Jeff Brown and William Buckingham teachers Bertha Spahr and Jennifer Miller and newspaper reporters Heidi Bernhard Bubb and Joseph Maldonado |
| Match 365 (1):
Reference (024678 .. 024689, of 34107): |
Subject (016676 .. 016690, of 36359): |
|
with the exception of Buckingham the testimony of these witnesses was both |
With the exception of Buckingham the testimony of these witnesses was credible and convincing o |
| Match 366 (1):
Reference (024678 .. 024692, of 34107): |
Subject (016676 .. 016689, of 36359): |
|
with the exception of Buckingham the testimony of these witnesses was both credible and convincing |
With the exception of Buckingham the testimony of these witnesses was credible and convincing |
| Match 367 (1):
Reference (024713 .. 024727, of 34107): |
Subject (016885 .. 016899, of 36359): |
|
approval of several science textbooks appeared on the agenda for the meeting but not approval |
Approval of several science textbooks appeared on the agenda for the meeting but not approval |
| Match 368 (1):
Reference (024738 .. 024756, of 34107): |
Subject (016909 .. 016924, of 36359): |
|
Barrie Callahan asked whether the Board would approve the purchase of the 2002 edition of the textbook entitled Biology |
Barrie Callahan asked whether the Board would approve the purchase of the 2002 edition of Biology |
| Match 369 (1):
Reference (024757 .. 024783, of 34107): |
Subject (016929 .. 016956, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham told Callahan that the book was laced with Darwinism and spoke in favor of purchasing a textbook that included a balance of creationism and evolution P |
Buckingham told Callahan that the book was laced with Darwinism and he spoke in favor of purchasing a textbook that included a balance of creationism and evolution P46 |
| Match 370 (1):
Reference (024757 .. 024814, of 34107): |
Subject (016929 .. 016985, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham told Callahan that the book was laced with Darwinism and spoke in favor of purchasing a textbook that included a balance of creationism and evolution P 46 P 790 35 76 78 Baksa 24 45 46 Nilsen 3 135 36 B Callahan 4 51 52 B Rehm 6 62 63 C Rehm 7 25 26 C Brown |
Buckingham told Callahan that the book was laced with Darwinism and he spoke in favor of purchasing a textbook that included a balance of creationism and evolution P46 P790 35 76 78 Baksa 24 45 46 Nilsen 3 135 36 B Callahan 4 51 52 B Rehm 6 62 63 C Rehm 7 25 26 C Brown |
| Match 371 (1):
Reference (024836 .. 024856, of 34107): |
Subject (016994 .. 017015, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham said that the Board Curriculum Committee would look for a book that presented a balance between creationism and evolution P |
Buckingham c Buckingham said the Board Curriculum Committee would look for a book that presented a balance between creationism and evolution P45 |
| Match 372 (1):
Reference (024886 .. 024927, of 34107): |
Subject (017027 .. 017066, of 36359): |
|
Third Bonsell said that there were only two theories that could possibly be taught creationism and evolution and as long as both were taught as theories there would be no problems for the District P 46 P 790 6 65 C Rehm |
d Bonsell said that there were only two theories that could possibly be taught creationism and evolution and as long as both were taught as theories there would be no problems for the district P46 P790 6 65 C Rehm |
| Match 373 (1):
Reference (024929 .. 024941, of 34107): |
Subject (017068 .. 017080, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P |
Buckingham spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P47 |
| Match 374 (1):
Reference (024929 .. 024988, of 34107): |
Subject (017068 .. 017122, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P 47 P 791 8 60 61 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 3 137 38 B Callahan 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 60 66 Maldonado Fifth both Wenrich and Bonsell spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P |
Buckingham spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P47 P791 8 60 61 J Brown 7 33 C Brown 3 137 138 B Callahan 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 60 66 Maldonado f Wenrich spoke in favor of having a biology book that included creationism P47 |
| Match 375 (1):
Reference (024999 .. 025011, of 34107): |
Subject (017094 .. 017108, of 36359): |
|
Brown 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 66 Maldonado |
B Callahan 30 89 90 105 06 110 11 Bernhard Bubb 31 60 66 Maldonado |
| Match 376 (1):
Reference (025017 .. 025034, of 34107): |
Subject (017184 .. 017201, of 36359): |
|
Sixth Superintendent Nilsen said that the District was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories |
h Superintendent Nilsen said that the district was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories |
| Match 377 (1):
Reference (025017 .. 025046, of 34107): |
Subject (017184 .. 017214, of 36359): |
|
Sixth Superintendent Nilsen said that the District was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories and never challenged the accuracy of that quotation 25 119 20 Nilsen |
h Superintendent Nilsen said that the district was looking for a textbook that presented all options and theories P44 He never challenged the accuracy of that quotation 25 119 20 Nilsen |
| Match 378 (1):
Reference (025056 .. 025070, of 34107): |
Subject (017219 .. 017232, of 36359): |
|
separation of church and state is a myth and not something that he supports P |
separation of church and state is a myth and not something he supports P44 |
| Match 379 (1):
Reference (025076 .. 025092, of 34107): |
Subject (017234 .. 017250, of 36359): |
|
P 791 3 141 42 B Callahan 7 32 33 C Brown 31 66 67 Maldonado Buckingham |
P47 P791 3 141 42 B Callahan 7 32 33 C Brown 31 66 67 Maldonado Buckingham |
| Match 380 (1):
Reference (025092 .. 025113, of 34107): |
Subject (017261 .. 017281, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham also said It is inexcusable to have a book that says man descended from apes with nothing to counterbalance it P |
Buckingham said It is inexcusable to have a book that says man descended from apes with nothing to counterbalance it P44 |
| Match 381 (1):
Reference (025092 .. 025121, of 34107): |
Subject (017261 .. 017287, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham also said It is inexcusable to have a book that says man descended from apes with nothing to counterbalance it P 44 P 804 30 77 78 Bernhard Bubb |
Buckingham said It is inexcusable to have a book that says man descended from apes with nothing to counterbalance it P44 P804 30 77 78 Bernhard Bubb |
| Match 382 (1):
Reference (025128 .. 025152, of 34107): |
Subject (017294 .. 017318, of 36359): |
|
This country wasn t founded on Muslim beliefs or evolution This country was founded on Christianity and our students should be taught as such P |
This country wasn t founded on Muslim beliefs or evolution This country was founded on Christianity and our students should be taught as such P46 |
| Match 383 (1):
Reference (025128 .. 025158, of 34107): |
Subject (017294 .. 017322, of 36359): |
|
This country wasn t founded on Muslim beliefs or evolution This country was founded on Christianity and our students should be taught as such P 46 P 790 31 63 Maldonado |
This country wasn t founded on Muslim beliefs or evolution This country was founded on Christianity and our students should be taught as such P46 P790 31 63 Maldonado |
| Match 384 (1):
Reference (025177 .. 025188, of 34107): |
Subject (017339 .. 017350, of 36359): |
|
subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of |
subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of |
| Match 385 (1):
Reference (025177 .. 025209, of 34107): |
Subject (017339 .. 017371, of 36359): |
|
subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of the meeting but members of the public made comments and the Board continued to debate the subject of the biology textbook |
subject of the biology textbook did not appear on the agenda of this meeting but members of the public made comments and the Board continued to debate the subject of the biology textbook |
| Match 386 (1):
Reference (025234 .. 025275, of 34107): |
Subject (017397 .. 017438, of 36359): |
|
evolution teaches nothing but lies quoted from Genesis asked how can we allow anything else to be taught in our schools recited gospel verses telling people to become born again Christians and stated that evolution violated the teachings of the Bible P |
evolution teaches nothing but lies quoted from Genesis asked how can we allow anything else to be taught in our schools recited gospel verses telling people to become born again Christians and stated that evolution violated the teachings of the Bible P53 |
| Match 387 (1):
Reference (025234 .. 025325, of 34107): |
Subject (017397 .. 017486, of 36359): |
|
evolution teaches nothing but lies quoted from Genesis asked how can we allow anything else to be taught in our schools recited gospel verses telling people to become born again Christians and stated that evolution violated the teachings of the Bible P 53 P 793 4 55 56 B Rehm 6 71 C Rehm 7 34 35 C Brown 8 104 05 F Callahan 8 63 J Brown 30 107 08 Bernhard Bubb 31 76 77 Maldonado 33 37 43 Bonsell 29 82 83 Buckingham 12 125 J Miller 13 84 Spahr |
evolution teaches nothing but lies quoted from Genesis asked how can we allow anything else to be taught in our schools recited gospel verses telling people to become born again Christians and stated that evolution violated the teachings of the Bible P53 P793 4 55 56 B Rehm 6 71 C Rehm 7 34 35 C Brown 8 104 05 F Callahan 8 63 J Brown 30 107 08 Bernhard Bubb 31 76 77 Maldonado 33 37 43 Bonsell 29 82 83 Buckingham 12 125 J Miller 13 84 Spahr |
| Match 388 (1):
Reference (025327 .. 025340, of 34107): |
Subject (017488 .. 017501, of 36359): |
|
her deposition Charlotte Buckingham admitted that she made a speech at the June 14 |
her deposition Charlotte Buckingham admitted that she made a speech at the June 14 |
| Match 389 (1):
Reference (025327 .. 025357, of 34107): |
Subject (017488 .. 017514, of 36359): |
|
her deposition Charlotte Buckingham admitted that she made a speech at the June 14 2004 Board meeting in which she argued that creationism as set forth in Genesis should be taught |
her deposition Charlotte Buckingham admitted that she made a speech at the June 14 board meeting arguing that creationism as set forth in Genesis should be taught |
| Match 390 (1):
Reference (025359 .. 025379, of 34107): |
Subject (017516 .. 017539, of 36359): |
|
Dover High School and that she read quotations from scripture as part of her speech C Buckingham Dep at 19 22 |
Dover High School and that she read quotations from scripture as part of her speech C Buckingham Dep 4 15 05 at 19 22 |
| Match 391 (1):
Reference (025392 .. 025417, of 34107): |
Subject (017547 .. 017571, of 36359): |
|
Board members Buckingham and Geesey said amen 7 35 C Brown Third Buckingham stood by his opposition to the 2002 edition of the textbook entitled Biology |
board members William Buckingham and Geesey said amen 7 35 C Brown d William Buckingham stood by his opposition to the 2002 edition of Biology |
| Match 392 (1):
Reference (025419 .. 025435, of 34107): |
Subject (017579 .. 017597, of 36359): |
|
Bonsell and Wenrich said they agreed with Buckingham that creationism should be taught to balance evolution P |
Bonsell and Wenrich said that they agreed with William Buckingham that creationism should be taught to balance evolution P806 |
| Match 393 (1):
Reference (025419 .. 025440, of 34107): |
Subject (017579 .. 017601, of 36359): |
|
Bonsell and Wenrich said they agreed with Buckingham that creationism should be taught to balance evolution P 806 P 54 Fifth Buckingham |
Bonsell and Wenrich said that they agreed with William Buckingham that creationism should be taught to balance evolution P806 P54 f William Buckingham |
| Match 394 (1):
Reference (025451 .. 025464, of 34107): |
Subject (017603 .. 017616, of 36359): |
|
Nowhere in the Constitution does it call for a separation of church and state |
Nowhere in the Constitution does it call for a separation of church and state |
| Match 395 (1):
Reference (025473 .. 025493, of 34107): |
Subject (017652 .. 017670, of 36359): |
|
Christianity Buckingham concedes that he said I challenge you the audience to trace your roots to the monkey you came from |
h William Buckingham said I challenge you the audience to trace your roots to the monkey you came from |
| Match 396 (1):
Reference (025495 .. 025509, of 34107): |
Subject (017688 .. 017702, of 36359): |
|
said that while growing up his generation read from the Bible and prayed during school |
said that while growing up his generation read from the Bible and prayed during school |
| Match 397 (1):
Reference (025512 .. 025523, of 34107): |
Subject (017711 .. 017722, of 36359): |
|
said liberals in black robes were taking away the rights of Christians |
said liberals in black robes were taking away the rights of Christians |
| Match 398 (1):
Reference (025526 .. 025548, of 34107): |
Subject (017739 .. 017761, of 36359): |
|
said words to the effect of 2 000 years ago someone died on a cross Can t someone take a stand for him |
said words to the effect of 2 000 years ago someone died on a cross Can t someone take a stand for him |
| Match 399 (1):
Reference (025590 .. 025607, of 34107): |
Subject (017798 .. 017815, of 36359): |
|
Rehm 6 96 Eveland 7 26 27 C Brown 8 63 J Brown 8 105 06 F Callahan |
Rehm 6 96 Eveland 7 26 27 C Brown 8 63 J Brown 8 105 06 F Callahan |
| Match 400 (1):
Reference (025609 .. 025632, of 34107): |
Subject (017833 .. 017858, of 36359): |
|
although Buckingham Bonsell and other defense witnesses denied the reports in the news media and contradicted the great weight of the evidence about what |
o 177 Buckingham Bonsell and other witnesses for defendants denied the reports in the news media and contradicted the great weight of the evidence about what |
| Match 401 (1):
Reference (025681 .. 025692, of 34107): |
Subject (022065 .. 022073, of 36359): |
|
2004 the Board Curriculum Committee met with the teachers to discuss a |
2004 the Board Curriculum Committee met to discuss changing |
| Match 402 (1):
Reference (025690 .. 025706, of 34107): |
Subject (017946 .. 017963, of 36359): |
|
to discuss a list of Buckingham s concerns about the textbook Biology 12 114 15 J Miller |
to discuss P132 a list of Buckingham s concerns about the textbook Biology 12 114 15 J Miller |
| Match 403 (1):
Reference (025728 .. 025745, of 34107): |
Subject (018069 .. 018086, of 36359): |
|
the reference to a species of finch known as Darwin s finch simply because it referred to Darwin |
the reference to a species of finch known as Darwin s finch simply because it refers to Darwin |
| Match 404 (1):
Reference (025750 .. 025779, of 34107): |
Subject (018093 .. 018123, of 36359): |
|
the textbook did not give balanced presentation by which he meant that it did not include the theory of creationism with God as creator of all life 7 45 48 |
the textbook because it did not give balanced presentation by which he meant that it did not include the theory of creationism with God as creator of all life 7 48 |
| Match 405 (1):
Reference (025785 .. 025813, of 34107): |
Subject (018226 .. 018257, of 36359): |
|
of the meeting addressed Buckingham s concern that the teachers were teaching what he referred to as origins of life apparently including the origin of species and common ancestry |
of the meeting centered around Buckingham s concern that the teachers were teaching what he referred to as origins of life which for him apparently includes origin of species and common ancestry |
| Match 406 (1):
Reference (025837 .. 025860, of 34107): |
Subject (018344 .. 018367, of 36359): |
|
the meeting Baksa provided those in attendance with several documents including a survey of biology books used in private religious schools in York County |
the meeting Baksa provided those in attendance with copies of P138 a survey of biology books used in private religious schools in York County |
| Match 407 (1):
Reference (025861 .. 025872, of 34107): |
Subject (018432 .. 018443, of 36359): |
|
a product profile of a biology textbook used at Bob Jones University |
a product profile of a biology textbook used at Bob Jones University |
| Match 408 (1):
Reference (025907 .. 025933, of 34107): |
Subject (018529 .. 018555, of 36359): |
|
explains the difference between Young Earth Creationism Creation Science Progressive Creationism Old Earth Creation Evolutionary Creation Theistic Creation Deistic Evolution Theistic Evolution and Dysteleological Evolution Atheistic Evolution |
explains the difference between Young Earth Creationism Creation Science Progressive Creationism Old Earth Creation Evolutionary Creation Theistic Creation Deistic Evolution Theistic Evolution and Dysteleological Evolution Atheistic Evolution |
| Match 409 (1):
Reference (025940 .. 025958, of 34107): |
Subject (018567 .. 018581, of 36359): |
|
under the Progressive Creation Old Earth Creation is that of the Intelligent Design Movement Phillip Johnson Michael Behe P |
under Progressive Creation Old Earth Creation is Intelligent Design Movement Phillip Johnson Michael Behe P149 |
| Match 410 (1):
Reference (026030 .. 026043, of 34107): |
Subject (016260 .. 016270, of 36359): |
|
the teachers had already watched the video Icons of Evolution from the Discovery Institute |
the science teachers to watch a video from the Discovery Institute |
| Match 411 (1):
Reference (026031 .. 026059, of 34107): |
Subject (018753 .. 018785, of 36359): |
|
teachers had already watched the video Icons of Evolution from the Discovery Institute at Buckingham s insistence they agreed to review it again and consider using in class any |
teachers had already watched the video Icons of Evolution that Buckingham received from the Discovery Institute but at Buckingham s insistence they agreed to review it again and consider using in class any |
| Match 412 (1):
Reference (026061 .. 026081, of 34107): |
Subject (018790 .. 018810, of 36359): |
|
that aligned with their curriculum 26 122 Baksa Although Baksa believed that the teachers had already determined there were no parts |
that aligned with their curriculum 26 122 Baksa Baksa believed that the teachers had already determined that there were no parts |
| Match 413 (1):
Reference (026136 .. 026149, of 34107): |
Subject (018147 .. 018160, of 36359): |
|
destroyed in 2002 by Larry Reeser the head of buildings and grounds for the |
destroyed in 2002 by Larry Reeser the head of buildings and grounds for the |
| Match 414 (1):
Reference (026151 .. 026161, of 34107): |
Subject (018126 .. 018136, of 36359): |
|
At the June 2004 meeting Spahr asked Buckingham where he had |
At the June meeting Bertha Spahr asked Buckingham where he had |
| Match 415 (1):
Reference (026176 .. 026190, of 34107): |
Subject (018176 .. 018188, of 36359): |
|
Jen Miller testified that Buckingham responded I gleefully watched it burn 12 118 J Miller |
Jennifer Miller Buckingham responded I gleefully watched it burn 12 118 J Miller |
| Match 416 (1):
Reference (026191 .. 026209, of 34107): |
Subject (018204 .. 018222, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham disliked the mural because he thought it advocated the theory of evolution particularly common ancestry 26 120 Baksa |
Buckingham disliked the mural because he thought it advocated the theory of evolution particularly common ancestry 26 120 Baksa |
| Match 417 (1):
Reference (026222 .. 026241, of 34107): |
Subject (018856 .. 018875, of 36359): |
|
demanded that the teachers agree that there would never again be a mural depicting evolution in any of the classrooms |
demanded that the teachers agree that there would never again be a mural depicting evolution in any of the classrooms |
| Match 418 (1):
Reference (026246 .. 026263, of 34107): |
Subject (018887 .. 018901, of 36359): |
|
would agree to support the purchase of the biology textbook in need by the students 36 56 57 |
would agree to support the purchase of the biology textbook the students needed 36 57 |
| Match 419 (1):
Reference (026273 .. 026292, of 34107): |
Subject (018907 .. 018926, of 36359): |
|
there was some mention of the words intelligent design at the meeting but he cannot recall who raised the subject |
there was some mention of the words intelligent design at this meeting but he cannot recall who raised the subject |
| Match 420 (1):
Reference (026314 .. 026328, of 34107): |
Subject (019009 .. 019022, of 36359): |
|
word creationism used by Buckingham at a Board meeting earlier that month 35 96 98 |
word creationism used by Buckingham at a board meeting earlier that month 35 98 |
| Match 421 (1):
Reference (026358 .. 026367, of 34107): |
Subject (000385 .. 000403, of 36359): |
|
g July 2004 Buckingham Contacted Richard Thompson and Learned about |
Teaching of Creationism J July 2004 Buckingham Contacted Rchard Thompson of the Thomas More Law Center and Learned about |
| Match 422 (1):
Reference (026371 .. 026384, of 34107): |
Subject (019798 .. 019811, of 36359): |
|
point before late July 2004 Buckingham contacted the Thomas More Law Center hereinafter TMLC |
o 191 Sometime before late July 2004 Buckingham contacted Thomas More Law Center TMLC |
| Match 423 (1):
Reference (026425 .. 026439, of 34107): |
Subject (019908 .. 019927, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham and the Board first learned of the creationist textbook Pandas from Richard Thompson at |
Buckingham and the Board first learned of the creationist textbook Of Pandas and People from Richard Thompson sometime before late |
| Match 424 (1):
Reference (026442 .. 026455, of 34107): |
Subject (019926 .. 019936, of 36359): |
|
before late July 2004 29 107 08 Buckingham 30 10 12 15 16 Buckingham |
before late July 2004 29 107 08 30 10 12 Buckingham |
| Match 425 (1):
Reference (026464 .. 026482, of 34107): |
Subject (020057 .. 020073, of 36359): |
|
Discovered In July 2004 after the teachers discovered that there was a 2004 edition of the textbook Biology available |
o 195 In July 2004 the teachers discovered that there was a 2004 edition of Biology available |
| Match 426 (1):
Reference (026504 .. 026513, of 34107): |
Subject (020066 .. 020080, of 36359): |
|
the 2004 edition 12 127 J Miller 13 30 Spahr |
there was a 2004 edition of Biology available 12 127 J Miller 13 30 Spahr |
| Match 427 (1):
Reference (026517 .. 026526, of 34107): |
Subject (020114 .. 020123, of 36359): |
|
Spahr Miller and Baksa met to review the 2004 edition |
Spahr Miller and Baksa met to review the 2004 edition |
| Match 428 (1):
Reference (026554 .. 026568, of 34107): |
Subject (000439 .. 000452, of 36359): |
|
August 2004 Buckingham and Other Board Members Tried to Prevent Purchase of Standard Biology Textbook |
August 2004 Buckingham and Others Tried to Prevent Purchase of the Standard Biology Textbook |
| Match 429 (1):
Reference (026597 .. 026610, of 34107): |
Subject (020229 .. 020243, of 36359): |
|
meeting Casey Brown received a telephone call from Baksa who told her that Buckingham |
meeting Casey Brown received a call from Assistant Superintendent Baksa who told her that Buckingham |
| Match 430 (1):
Reference (026611 .. 026643, of 34107): |
Subject (020254 .. 020286, of 36359): |
|
recommended that the District purchase Pandas as a supplemental textbook 7 52 53 C Brown 8 64 J Brown Jeff Brown then went to Harkins home to pick up a copy of Pandas |
recommended the school district purchase as a supplemental textbook 7 52 53 C Brown 8 64 J Brown o 199 Jeff Brown went to Harkins home to pick up a copy of Pandas |
| Match 431 (1):
Reference (026648 .. 026660, of 34107): |
Subject (020290 .. 020302, of 36359): |
|
told him that she wanted the school District to purchase the book 8 |
told him that she wanted the school district to purchase the book 8 |
| Match 432 (1):
Reference (026669 .. 026709, of 34107): |
Subject (020421 .. 020467, of 36359): |
|
2004 meeting Buckingham opposed the purchase of Biology which was recommended by the faculty and administration unless the Board also approved the purchase of Pandas as a companion text Only eight members of the Board were present on August 2 2004 |
200 At the board meeting four days later Buckingham opposed the purchase of Biology which was recommended by the faculty and administration unless the Board also approved the purchase of Pandas as a companion text Only eight members of the Board were present on August 2 2004 |
| Match 433 (1):
Reference (026710 .. 026733, of 34107): |
Subject (020472 .. 020497, of 36359): |
|
and the initial vote to approve the purchase of Pandas failed on a four to four vote with Buckingham Harkins Geesey and Yingling voting |
and the initial vote to approve the purchase of Pandas failed to pass on a four to four vote with Buckingham Harkins Geesey and Yingling voting |
| Match 434 (1):
Reference (026735 .. 026744, of 34107): |
Subject (020499 .. 020508, of 36359): |
|
it 8 68 J Brown 29 105 06 Buckingham P |
it 8 68 J Brown 29 105 06 Buckingham P67 |
| Match 435 (1):
Reference (026747 .. 026779, of 34107): |
Subject (020511 .. 020544, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham stated that he had five votes in favor of purchasing Pandas and if the Board approved the purchase of Pandas he would release his votes to also approve the purchase of Biology |
Buckingham stated that he had five votes in favor of purchasing Pandas and that if the Board approved the purchase of Pandas he would release his votes to also approve the purchase of Biology |
| Match 436 (1):
Reference (026780 .. 026803, of 34107): |
Subject (020550 .. 020570, of 36359): |
|
Yingling changed her vote and the motion to approve the purchase of Biology passed P 67 8 68 69 J Brown At trial Buckingham |
Yingling then changed her vote and the motion to approve the purchase of Biology passed P67 8 69 At trial Buckingham |
| Match 437 (1):
Reference (026805 .. 026829, of 34107): |
Subject (020572 .. 020595, of 36359): |
|
that at the meeting he specifically said if he didn t get his book the district would not get the biology book 29 106 Buckingham |
that at the meeting he said if he didn t get his book the district would not get the biology book 29 106 Buckingham |
| Match 438 (1):
Reference (026838 .. 026852, of 34107): |
Subject (020638 .. 020652, of 36359): |
|
Board On August 26 2004 Board Solicitor Stephen S Russell sent an email to Nilsen |
o 203 On August 26 2004 the Board Solicitor sent an email to Superintendent Nilsen |
| Match 439 (1):
Reference (026865 .. 026874, of 34107): |
Subject (020675 .. 020684, of 36359): |
|
t hey refer to the creationism issue as intelligent design |
Center They refer to the creationism issue as intelligent design |
| Match 440 (1):
Reference (026884 .. 026940, of 34107): |
Subject (020685 .. 020740, of 36359): |
|
They TMLC have background knowledge and have talked to school boards in West Virginia and Michigan about possible litigation However nothing has come about in either state This suggests to me that no one is adopting the textbook because if they were one can safely assume there would have been a legal challenge by someone somewhere I |
They have background knowledge and have talked to school boards in West Virginia and Michigan about possible litigation However nothing has come about in either state This suggests to me that no one is adopting the textbook because if they were one can safely assume there would have been a legal challenge by someone somewhere I |
| Match 441 (1):
Reference (026938 .. 027094, of 34107): |
Subject (020751 .. 020910, of 36359): |
|
someone somewhere I guess my main concern at the moment is that even if use of the text is purely voluntary this may still make it very difficult to win a case I say this because one of the common themes in some of the US Supreme Court decisions especially dealing with silent meditation is that even though something is voluntary it still causes a problem because the practice whatever it may be was initiated for religious reasons One of the best examples comes out of the silent meditation cases in Alabama which the court struck down because the record showed that the statute in question was enacted for religious reasons My concern for Dover is that in the last several years there has been a lot of discussion news print etc for putting religion back in the schools In my mind this would add weight to a lawsuit seeking to enjoin whatever the practice might be |
on more than one occasion I guess my main concern at the moment is that even if use of the text is purely voluntary this may still make it very difficult to win a case I say this because one of the common themes in some of the US Supreme Court decision especially dealing with silent meditation is that even though something is voluntary it still causes a problem because the practice whatever it may be was initiated for religious reasons One of the best examples comes out of the silent meditation cases in Alabama which the court struck down because the record showed that the statute in question was enacted for religious reasons My concern for Dover is that in the last several years there has been a lot of discussion news print etc for putting religion back in the schools In my mind this would add weight to a lawsuit seeking to enjoin whatever the practice might be |
| Match 442 (1):
Reference (027096 .. 027125, of 34107): |
Subject (020912 .. 020942, of 36359): |
|
emphasis added Nilsen subsequently shared this email with everyone present at the Board Curriculum Committee meeting on August 30 2004 including Buckingham Bonsell and Harkins 25 135 36 Nilsen Additionally |
emphasis added o 204 Nilsen shared this email with everyone present at the Board Curriculum Committee meeting on August 30 2004 including Buckingham Bonsell and Harkins 25 135 36 Nilsen o |
| Match 443 (1):
Reference (027096 .. 027157, of 34107): |
Subject (020912 .. 020976, of 36359): |
|
emphasis added Nilsen subsequently shared this email with everyone present at the Board Curriculum Committee meeting on August 30 2004 including Buckingham Bonsell and Harkins 25 135 36 Nilsen Additionally both Nilsen and Baksa admitted that they knew the email referred to the news reports of the June 2004 meetings 25 135 36 138 39 Nilsen 35 105 06 111 12 Baksa |
emphasis added o 204 Nilsen shared this email with everyone present at the Board Curriculum Committee meeting on August 30 2004 including Buckingham Bonsell and Harkins 25 135 36 Nilsen o 205 Nilsen and Baksa both admitted that they knew the email referred to the news reports of the June 2004 board meetings 25 135 36 138 39 Nilsen 35 105 06 111 12 Baksa |
| Match 444 (1):
Reference (027152 .. 027164, of 34107): |
Subject (022003 .. 022016, of 36359): |
|
35 105 06 111 12 Baksa There is no evidence that the Board |
35 123 24 Baksa There is no evidence in the record that the Board |
| Match 445 (1):
Reference (027200 .. 027214, of 34107): |
Subject (000477 .. 000493, of 36359): |
|
August 30 2004 Board Curriculum Committee Forced Pandas on the Teachers as Reference Text On |
August 30 2004 The Board Curriculum Committee Forced Pandas on the Teachers as a Reference Text O |
| Match 446 (1):
Reference (027223 .. 027233, of 34107): |
Subject (021024 .. 021034, of 36359): |
|
with Spahr Miller Nilsen Baksa Bonsell Buckingham Harkins and Casey Brown |
with Spahr Miller Nilsen Baksa Bonsell Buckingham Harkins and Casey Brown |
| Match 447 (1):
Reference (027241 .. 027262, of 34107): |
Subject (021050 .. 021071, of 36359): |
|
Pandas and how it would be used in the classroom 12 134 J Miller Although Spahr expressed concern that the textbook taught |
and People and how it would be used in the classroom 12 134 J Miller Spahr expressed concern that the textbook taught |
| Match 448 (1):
Reference (027269 .. 027288, of 34107): |
Subject (021085 .. 021103, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham wanted Pandas to be used in the classroom as a comparison text side by side the standard biology textbook |
Buckingham wanted Pandas used in the classroom as a comparison text side by side with the standard biology textbook |
| Match 449 (1):
Reference (027311 .. 027324, of 34107): |
Subject (021129 .. 021142, of 36359): |
|
they agreed that Pandas could be placed in the classroom as a reference text |
teachers agreed that Pandas could be placed in the classroom as a reference text |
| Match 450 (1):
Reference (027341 .. 027360, of 34107): |
Subject (021222 .. 021244, of 36359): |
|
Baksa testified that no one could construe the teachers as having supported Pandas in any way reference text or otherwise |
Baksa testified that no one could construe the teachers as having supported Pandas in any way either as a reference text or otherwise |
| Match 451 (1):
Reference (027369 .. 027389, of 34107): |
Subject (021152 .. 021168, of 36359): |
|
that if the teachers compromised with the Board maybe this will go away again 35 120 Baksa 12 136 J Miller |
that if they compromised with the Board maybe this will go away again 12 136 J Miller |
| Match 452 (1):
Reference (027428 .. 027440, of 34107): |
Subject (021244 .. 021264, of 36359): |
|
the Board Baksa testified that during this time period he researched Pandas and |
otherwise 35 120 o 209 Baksa testified on direct examination that during this time period he did research on Pandas and |
| Match 453 (1):
Reference (027444 .. 027457, of 34107): |
Subject (021271 .. 021284, of 36359): |
|
directing his secretary to go to the webpage for the Institute for Creation Research |
directed his secretary to go to the webpage from the Institute for Creation Research |
| Match 454 (1):
Reference (027467 .. 027481, of 34107): |
Subject (021296 .. 021310, of 36359): |
|
webpage states that Pandas contains interpretations of classic evidences in harmony with the creation model |
webpage states that Pandas contains interpretations of classic evidences in harmony with the creation model |
| Match 455 (1):
Reference (027499 .. 027521, of 34107): |
Subject (021333 .. 021352, of 36359): |
|
35 114 15 Baksa The fact that Baksa contradicted this testimony on re direct and stated that he had never read the webpage |
35 115 Baksa Baksa then contradicted this testimony on re direct and stated that he had never read the webpage |
| Match 456 (1):
Reference (027553 .. 027578, of 34107): |
Subject (021408 .. 021432, of 36359): |
|
that Nilsen had accepted a donation of 60 copies of the text Pandas P 78 at 9 There is no evidence that Bonsell Buckingham or any |
that Superintendent Nilsen had accepted a donation of 60 copies of Pandas P78 at 9 There is no evidence that Bonsell or Buckingham or anyone |
| Match 457 (1):
Reference (027631 .. 027666, of 34107): |
Subject (021842 .. 021882, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham and Bonsell tried to hide the source of the donations because it showed at the very least the extraordinary measures taken to ensure that students received a creationist alternative to Darwin s theory of evoluti |
Buckingham and Bonsell tried to hide the source of the donations because they knew that it showed at the very least that they had taken extraordinary measures to ensure that students received a creationist alternative to Darwin s theory of evolution |
| Match 458 (1):
Reference (027685 .. 027696, of 34107): |
Subject (021520 .. 021533, of 36359): |
|
Court so Plaintiffs could decide whether to seek a temporary restraining order |
Court Order so that plaintiffs could decide whether to seek a temporary restraining order |
| Match 459 (1):
Reference (027706 .. 027736, of 34107): |
Subject (021557 .. 021587, of 36359): |
|
neither Buckingham nor Bonsell provided any information about Buckingham s involvement in the donation or about a collection he took at his church 30 50 56 Buckingham 33 31 35 Bonsell |
Neither Buckingham nor Bonsell provided any information about Buckingham s involvement in the donation or about a collection he took at his church 30 50 56 Buckingham 33 31 35 Bonsell |
| Match 460 (1):
Reference (027739 .. 027761, of 34107): |
Subject (021592 .. 021613, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham actually made a plea for donations to purchase Pandas at his church the Harmony Grove Community Church on a Sunday before services |
Buckingham made a plea for donations to purchase Pandas at his church the Harmony Grove Community Church on a Sunday before services |
| Match 461 (1):
Reference (027794 .. 027810, of 34107): |
Subject (021636 .. 021648, of 36359): |
|
to Donald Bonsell Alan Bonsell s father drawn on Buckingham s account jointly held with his wife |
to Donald Bonsell drawn on Buckingham s account jointly held with his wife |
| Match 462 (1):
Reference (027857 .. 027866, of 34107): |
Subject (021738 .. 021748, of 36359): |
|
discovered a catalogue from the company that sold the books |
discovered P144 a catalogue from the company that sold the books |
| Match 463 (1):
Reference (027867 .. 027879, of 34107): |
Subject (021754 .. 021765, of 36359): |
|
listing Pandas under Creation Science 13 94 5 Spahr P 144 at 29 |
lists Pandas under Creation Science 13 94 95 Spahr P144 at 29 |
| Match 464 (1):
Reference (027895 .. 027951, of 34107): |
Subject (021769 .. 021825, of 36359): |
|
testified that his father served as the conduit for the funds from Buckingham s church because He agreed to he said that he would take it I guess off the table or whatever because of seeing what was going on and with Mrs Callahan complaining at the Board meetings not using funds or whatever 33 129 Bonsell |
testified that his father served as the conduit for the funds from Buckingham s church because He agreed to he said that he would take it I guess off the table or whatever because of seeing what was going on and with Mrs Callahan complaining at the Board meeting not using funds or whatever 33 129 Bonsell |
| Match 465 (1):
Reference (027965 .. 027986, of 34107): |
Subject (027515 .. 027536, of 36359): |
|
both Bonsell and Buckingham lied at their January 3 2005 depositions about their knowledge of the source of the donation for Pandas |
Both Bonsell and Buckingham lied at their January 3 2005 depositions about their knowledge of the source of the donation for Pandas |
| Match 466 (1):
Reference (028023 .. 028036, of 34107): |
Subject (030634 .. 030646, of 36359): |
|
of the donations by the Board President and the Chair of the Curriculum Committee |
of the Board the President and the Chair of the Board Curriculum Committee |
| Match 467 (1):
Reference (028037 .. 028052, of 34107): |
Subject (021869 .. 021882, of 36359): |
|
to further ensure that Dover students received a creationist alternative to Darwin s theory of evolution |
to ensure that students received a creationist alternative to Darwin s theory of evolution |
| Match 468 (1):
Reference (028066 .. 028077, of 34107): |
Subject (034107 .. 034120, of 36359): |
|
to conceal the blatantly religious purpose behind the ID Policy m October |
to conceal an improper religious purpose o 325 Board members who supported the October |
| Match 469 (1):
Reference (028086 .. 028121, of 34107): |
Subject (021944 .. 021980, of 36359): |
|
In September 2004 acting on instructions of the Board Baksa prepared a change to the biology curriculum which stated Students will be made aware of gaps in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution |
In September 2004 acting on the instructions of the Board Baksa prepared a change to the biology curriculum which stated Students will be made aware of gaps in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution |
| Match 470 (1):
Reference (028204 .. 028217, of 34107): |
Subject (015869 .. 015880, of 36359): |
|
Bonsell and Harkins and the meeting involved a discussion of various positions regarding the |
Bonsell s concerns and that there had been a meeting of the |
| Match 471 (1):
Reference (028214 .. 028228, of 34107): |
Subject (022127 .. 022139, of 36359): |
|
various positions regarding the proposed curriculum change P 81 35 125 Baksa 29 113 Buckingham |
various positions regarding the proposed curriculum change 35 125 Baksa 29 113 Buckingham |
| Match 472 (1):
Reference (028243 .. 028262, of 34107): |
Subject (021962 .. 021980, of 36359): |
|
which states Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution |
which stated Students will be made aware of gaps in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution |
| Match 473 (1):
Reference (028245 .. 028292, of 34107): |
Subject (022174 .. 022220, of 36359): |
|
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design P 82 35 125 Baksa The Board Curriculum Committee s proposed change also called for Pandas to be cited as a reference text |
Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design P82 35 125 Baksa The Board Curriculum Committee s proposed change also called for Pandas to be cited as a reference text |
| Match 474 (1):
Reference (028306 .. 028330, of 34107): |
Subject (022311 .. 022334, of 36359): |
|
the change proposed by the administration and accepted by the science faculty were circulated to the full Board by memoranda dated October 13 2004 P |
the change proposed by administration and accepted by the science faculty were circulated to the full Board by memoranda dated October 13 2004 P84A |
| Match 475 (1):
Reference (028342 .. 028394, of 34107): |
Subject (022348 .. 022400, of 36359): |
|
On October 18 2004 the Board passed by a 6 3 vote a resolution that amended the biology curriculum as follows Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design Note Origins of Life is not taught |
On October 18 2004 the Board passed by a 6 3 vote a resolution that amended the biology curriculum as follows Students will be made aware of gaps problems in Darwin s theory and of other theories of evolution including but not limited to intelligent design Note Origins of Life is not taught |
| Match 476 (1):
Reference (028402 .. 028412, of 34107): |
Subject (022407 .. 022417, of 36359): |
|
this subject is to be covered in lecture form with Pandas |
this subject to be covered in lecture format with Of Pandas |
| Match 477 (1):
Reference (028433 .. 028451, of 34107): |
Subject (022436 .. 022453, of 36359): |
|
Bonsell Buckingham Harkins Geesey Cleaver and Yingling voted for the resolution with Noel Wenrich and Casey and Jeff Brown |
Bonsell Harkins Buckingham Geesey Cleaver and Yingling voted for the resolution Noel Wenrich and Casey and Jeff Brown |
| Match 478 (1):
Reference (028470 .. 028482, of 34107): |
Subject (022467 .. 022479, of 36359): |
|
passing the resolution the Board deviated from its regular practice in important respects |
passing the resolution the Board deviated from its regular practice in important respects |
| Match 479 (1):
Reference (028483 .. 028498, of 34107): |
Subject (022519 .. 022534, of 36359): |
|
The normal procedures were not followed at all in making this change 7 79 C Brown |
The normal procedures were not followed at all in making this change 7 79 C Brown |
| Match 480 (1):
Reference (028501 .. 028512, of 34107): |
Subject (022480 .. 022493, of 36359): |
|
Board typically addressed curriculum changes an entire year in advance of implementation |
a Typically the Board addressed curriculum changes an entire year in advance of implementation |
| Match 481 (1):
Reference (028522 .. 028532, of 34107): |
Subject (022508 .. 022518, of 36359): |
|
during the 2004 05 school year to be effective that year |
during the 2004 05 school year to be effective that year |
| Match 482 (1):
Reference (028567 .. 028580, of 34107): |
Subject (022572 .. 022584, of 36359): |
|
for resolution on the agenda at the action meeting held later in the month |
for resolution on the agenda at the action meeting later in the month |
| Match 483 (1):
Reference (028581 .. 028602, of 34107): |
Subject (022590 .. 022610, of 36359): |
|
The change to the biology curriculum however was placed on the Board s agenda for the first time during an action meeting |
The change to the biology curriculum was placed on the Board s agenda for the first time during an action meeting |
| Match 484 (1):
Reference (028581 .. 028605, of 34107): |
Subject (022590 .. 022614, of 36359): |
|
The change to the biology curriculum however was placed on the Board s agenda for the first time during an action meeting which several witnesses |
The change to the biology curriculum was placed on the Board s agenda for the first time during an action meeting a number of witnesses |
| Match 485 (1):
Reference (028630 .. 028639, of 34107): |
Subject (022636 .. 022646, of 36359): |
|
Board practice called for the District Curriculum Committee to meet |
Board practice also called for the District Curriculum Committee to meet |
| Match 486 (1):
Reference (028630 .. 028645, of 34107): |
Subject (022636 .. 022650, of 36359): |
|
Board practice called for the District Curriculum Committee to meet and discuss the proposed curriculum change |
Board practice also called for the District Curriculum Committee to meet to discuss the change |
| Match 487 (1):
Reference (028655 .. 028668, of 34107): |
Subject (022671 .. 022683, of 36359): |
|
the Board overruled that suggestion 7 72 73 C Brown 26 8 10 Nilsen |
the Board overruled that suggestion 7 73 C Brown 26 8 10 Nilsen |
| Match 488 (1):
Reference (028671 .. 028687, of 34107): |
Subject (022710 .. 022726, of 36359): |
|
administration did send the proposed change to the District Curriculum Committee and received feedback from two members |
administration did send the proposed change to the District Curriculum Committee and received feedback from two members |
| Match 489 (1):
Reference (028728 .. 028742, of 34107): |
Subject (022790 .. 022803, of 36359): |
|
the Board brazenly chose not to follow the advice of their only science education resources |
the Board chose not to follow the advice of their only science education resource |
| Match 490 (1):
Reference (028744 .. 028761, of 34107): |
Subject (022769 .. 022789, of 36359): |
|
the teachers were not included in the process of drafting the language adopted by the Board Curriculum Committee |
either suggestion d The teachers were not included in the process of drafting the language adopted by the Board Curriculum Committee |
| Match 491 (1):
Reference (028779 .. 028800, of 34107): |
Subject (022815 .. 022838, of 36359): |
|
witnesses testified that the rush to bring the curriculum change to a vote occurred because the issue had been debated for the |
Witnesses for defendants testified that the rush to bring the curriculum change to a vote occurred because the issue had been debated for the |
| Match 492 (1):
Reference (028802 .. 028844, of 34107): |
Subject (022840 .. 022882, of 36359): |
|
six months and more importantly the Board was about to lose two Board members Wenrich and Cleaver who had been a part of those discussions 26 10 12 Nilsen 33 113 14 Bonsell The record contains no evidence of any public Board meetings |
six months and the Board was about to lose two board members Noel Wenrich and Jane Cleaver who had been a part of those discussions 26 10 12 Nilsen 33 113 14 Bonsell Their record contains no evidence of any public board meetings |
| Match 493 (1):
Reference (028854 .. 028865, of 34107): |
Subject (022888 .. 022903, of 36359): |
|
does show that the Board discussed creationism within that six month period |
design but the evidence shows that the Board did discuss creationism within that six month period |
| Match 494 (1):
Reference (028868 .. 028879, of 34107): |
Subject (031441 .. 031458, of 36359): |
|
the evidence reveals that Buckingham wanted the Board to vote on the |
the absence of any evidence that the Board acted to promote good science education or for any other |
| Match 495 (1):
Reference (028872 .. 028889, of 34107): |
Subject (022948 .. 022964, of 36359): |
|
Buckingham wanted the Board to vote on the resolution on October 18 2004 because he thought he had |
Buckingham wanted the Board to vote on the resolution on October 18 because he thought he had |
| Match 496 (1):
Reference (028891 .. 028900, of 34107): |
Subject (022967 .. 022977, of 36359): |
|
votes to pass the resolution adopted at the October 7 |
votes needed to pass the resolution adopted at the October 7 |
| Match 497 (1):
Reference (028898 .. 028912, of 34107): |
Subject (022980 .. 022995, of 36359): |
|
the October 7 2004 Board Curriculum Committee meeting 29 113 16 Buckingham Prior to the |
the Board Curriculum Committee 29 113 16 Buckingham o 228 On October 18 prior to the |
| Match 498 (1):
Reference (028915 .. 028924, of 34107): |
Subject (023119 .. 023128, of 36359): |
|
the October 18 2004 meeting science teachers Spahr and Miller |
the October 18 2004 meeting science teachers Spahr and Miller |
| Match 499 (1):
Reference (028934 .. 028946, of 34107): |
Subject (023137 .. 023149, of 36359): |
|
against the curriculum change 13 41 42 J Miller 13 88 93 Spahr |
against the curriculum change 13 41 42 J Miller 13 88 93 Spahr |
| Match 500 (1):
Reference (028951 .. 029006, of 34107): |
Subject (023151 .. 023208, of 36359): |
|
her statement to the Board that the teachers agreement to point out flaws problems with Darwin s theory not to teach origins of life and to have Pandas available as a reference text were all compromises with the Board Curriculum Committee after what she described as a long and tiresome process 13 91 92 Spahr She |
her statement to the Board Spahr made clear that the teachers agreement to point out flaws problems with Darwin s theory not to teach origins of life and have Pandas available as a reference text were all compromises with the Board Curriculum Committee after what she described as a long and tiresome process 13 91 92 Spahr She |
| Match 501 (1):
Reference (029008 .. 029025, of 34107): |
Subject (023210 .. 023227, of 36359): |
|
stated that the change was being railroaded through without input from the teachers or the District Curriculum Committee |
stated that the change was being railroaded through without input from the teachers or the District Curriculum Committee |
| Match 502 (1):
Reference (029050 .. 029065, of 34107): |
Subject (023390 .. 023405, of 36359): |
|
amounted to creationism and could not be taught legally 24 102 Nilsen 35 14 15 Baksa |
amounted to creationism and could not be taught legally 24 102 Nilsen 35 14 15 Baksa |
| Match 503 (1):
Reference (029081 .. 029091, of 34107): |
Subject (023260 .. 023270, of 36359): |
|
testified that the teachers did not support Pandas in any way |
testified that the teachers did not support Pandas in any way |
| Match 504 (1):
Reference (029093 .. 029111, of 34107): |
Subject (023282 .. 023300, of 36359): |
|
that they made compromises to insure the purchase of the biology book entitled Biology 35 119 20 Baksa Also |
at all but they made compromises to insure the purchase of the biology book 35 119 20 Baksa o |
| Match 505 (1):
Reference (029116 .. 029136, of 34107): |
Subject (023303 .. 023323, of 36359): |
|
suggestion the teachers supported any part of the curriculum change must be soundly rejected 35 20 21 Baksa The unrebuted evidence |
suggestion that the teachers supported any part of the curriculum change must be soundly rejected 35 20 21 Baksa The evidence |
| Match 506 (1):
Reference (029168 .. 029180, of 34107): |
Subject (023360 .. 023372, of 36359): |
|
a biology textbook that should have been approved as a matter of course |
a biology book that should have been provided as a matter of course |
| Match 507 (1):
Reference (029221 .. 029230, of 34107): |
Subject (023562 .. 023574, of 36359): |
|
justification was offered by any Board member for the curriculum |
justification was offered by any board member for the change in the curriculum |
| Match 508 (1):
Reference (029246 .. 029271, of 34107): |
Subject (023534 .. 023560, of 36359): |
|
Brown 12 139 40 J Miller 13 102 Spahr 32 25 26 40 Cleaver 30 23 25 Buckingham 31 182 83 Geesey 34 124 26 Harkins |
Brown 8 76 12 139 40 J Miller 13 102 Spahr 32 25 26 40 30 23 25 Buckingham 31 182 83 Geesey 34 124 26 Harkins |
| Match 509 (1):
Reference (029304 .. 029331, of 34107): |
Subject (023638 .. 023666, of 36359): |
|
understand the substance of the curriculum change adopted on October 18 2004 31 175 181 82 Geesey 32 49 50 Cleaver 34 117 18 124 25 Harkins In |
understand the substance of the curriculum change that was adopted on October 18 2004 31 181 82 Geesey 32 49 50 Cleaver 34 124 25 Harkins o 236 Instead |
| Match 510 (1):
Reference (029348 .. 029362, of 34107): |
Subject (023915 .. 023928, of 36359): |
|
amongst Board members Conspicuously Board members who voted for the curriculum change testified at trial |
o 240 Board members who voted for the curriculum change that testified at trial |
| Match 511 (1):
Reference (029375 .. 029386, of 34107): |
Subject (023957 .. 023969, of 36359): |
|
Geesey testified she did not understand the substance of the curriculum change |
Geesey testified that she did not understand the substance of the curriculum change |
| Match 512 (1):
Reference (029392 .. 029418, of 34107): |
Subject (023970 .. 023996, of 36359): |
|
31 181 82 Geesey 29 11 12 Buckingham Buckingham Dep 1 59 61 January 3 2005 34 48 49 Harkins 33 112 13 Bonsell 26 21 Nilsen |
31 181 82 Geesey 29 11 12 Buckingham Buckingham Dep 1 3 05 at 59 61 34 48 49 Harkins 33 112 113 Bonsell 26 21 Nilsen |
| Match 513 (1):
Reference (029427 .. 029448, of 34107): |
Subject (024054 .. 024075, of 36359): |
|
voting for the curriculum change Geesy deferred completely to Bonsell and Buckingham 31 154 55 161 62 168 184 87 190 Geesey |
voting for the curriculum change Geesey deferred completely to Bonsell and Buckingham 31 154 55 161 62 168 184 87 190 Geesey |
| Match 514 (1):
Reference (029474 .. 029489, of 34107): |
Subject (024017 .. 024030, of 36359): |
|
of the time of his first deposition which was two and a half months after the |
of the time of his first deposition two and a half months after the |
| Match 515 (1):
Reference (029506 .. 029524, of 34107): |
Subject (024076 .. 024095, of 36359): |
|
Cleaver voted for the curriculum change despite the teachers objections based upon assurances from Bonsell 32 23 25 Cleaver |
Cleaver voted for the change despite the objections of the teachers based on assurances from Bonsell 32 23 25 Cleaver |
| Match 516 (1):
Reference (029506 .. 029525, of 34107): |
Subject (024076 .. 024095, of 36359): |
|
Cleaver voted for the curriculum change despite the teachers objections based upon assurances from Bonsell 32 23 25 Cleaver Cleaver |
Cleaver voted for the change despite the objections of the teachers based on assurances from Bonsell 32 23 25 Cleaver |
| Match 517 (1):
Reference (029558 .. 029570, of 34107): |
Subject (024102 .. 024115, of 36359): |
|
Pandas except that Spahr had said it was not a good science book |
Pandas except that Bertha Spahr had said it was not a good science book |
| Match 518 (1):
Reference (029572 .. 029582, of 34107): |
Subject (024117 .. 024127, of 36359): |
|
should not be used in high school 32 45 46 Cleaver |
should not be used in high school 32 45 46 Cleaver |
| Match 519 (1):
Reference (029632 .. 029645, of 34107): |
Subject (023730 .. 023746, of 36359): |
|
Board never heard from any person or organization with scientific expertise about the curriculum |
Board never heard from any persons or organization with scientific expertise about the change to the curriculum |
| Match 520 (1):
Reference (029654 .. 029666, of 34107): |
Subject (023748 .. 023759, of 36359): |
|
the District s science teachers who uniformly opposed the change 29 109 Buckingham |
the district s science teachers who opposed the change 29 109 Buckingham |
| Match 521 (1):
Reference (029692 .. 029710, of 34107): |
Subject (023760 .. 023777, of 36359): |
|
The only outside organizations which the Board consulted prior to the vote were the Discovery Institute and TMLC and |
The only outside organizations the Board consulted prior to the vote were the Discovery Institute and TMLC and |
| Match 522 (1):
Reference (029728 .. 029757, of 34107): |
Subject (023789 .. 023817, of 36359): |
|
science education information 33 111 12 Bonsell 29 130 137 43 30 10 14 Buckingham The Board received no materials other than Pandas to assist them in making their vote |
science education 33 111 12 Bonsell 29 130 137 43 30 10 14 Buckingham The Board received no materials other than Pandas to assist them in making their vote |
| Match 523 (1):
Reference (029760 .. 029770, of 34107): |
Subject (023834 .. 023844, of 36359): |
|
anyone on the Board or in the administration ever contact the |
one on the Board or in the administration ever contacted the |
| Match 524 (1):
Reference (029774 .. 029791, of 34107): |
Subject (023857 .. 023874, of 36359): |
|
the National Science Teachers Association the National Association of Biology Teachers or any other organization for information about |
the National Science Teachers Association the National Association of Biology Teachers or any other organization for information about |
| Match 525 (1):
Reference (029883 .. 029903, of 34107): |
Subject (023888 .. 023908, of 36359): |
|
of these organizations have information about teaching evolution readily available on the internet and they include statements opposing the teaching of |
of these organizations have information about teaching evolution readily available on the Internet and they include statements opposing the teaching of |
| Match 526 (1):
Reference (029924 .. 029933, of 34107): |
Subject (024130 .. 024139, of 36359): |
|
Nilsen and Baksa opposed the curriculum change 35 126 Baksa |
Nilsen and Baksa opposed the curriculum change 35 126 Baksa |
| Match 527 (1):
Reference (029924 .. 029952, of 34107): |
Subject (024130 .. 024157, of 36359): |
|
Nilsen and Baksa opposed the curriculum change 35 126 Baksa Baksa testified that he still feels the curriculum change was wrong 35 127 Baksa Both Casey and Jeff Brown |
Nilsen and Baksa opposed the curriculum change 35 126 Baksa still feels the curriculum change was wrong 35 127 Baksa o 243 Both Casey Brown and Jeff Brown |
| Match 528 (1):
Reference (029958 .. 029968, of 34107): |
Subject (024158 .. 024168, of 36359): |
|
resigned at the conclusion of the October 18 2004 Board meeting |
resigned at the conclusion of the October 18 2004 board meeting |
| Match 529 (1):
Reference (029991 .. 030132, of 34107): |
Subject (024176 .. 024317, of 36359): |
|
There has been a slow but steady marginalization of some board members Our opinions are no longer valued or listened to Our contributions have been minimized or not acknowledged at all A measure of that is the fact that I myself have been twice asked within the past year if I was born again No one has nor should have the right to ask that of a fellow board member An individual s religious beliefs should have no impact on his or her ability to serve as a school board director nor should a person s beliefs be used as a yardstick to measure the value of that service However it has become increasingly evident that it is the direction the board has now chosen to go holding a certain religious belief is of paramount importance 7 92 93 C Brown Additionally |
There has been a slow but steady marginalization of some board members Our opinions are no longer valued or listened to Our contributions have been minimized or not acknowledged at all A measure of that is the fact that I myself have been twice asked within the past year if I was born again No one has nor should have the right to ask that of a fellow board member An individual s religious beliefs should have no impact on his or her ability to serve as a school board director nor should a person s beliefs be used as a yardstick to measure the value of that service However it has become increasingly evident that is the direction the board has now chosen to go holding a certain religious belief is of paramount importance P680 7 92 93 C Brown o |
| Match 530 (1):
Reference (030151 .. 030166, of 34107): |
Subject (022919 .. 022935, of 36359): |
|
in parliamentary measures to have the vote delayed until the community could properly debate the issue |
in his parliamentary measures to have the vote delayed until the community could properly debate the issue |
| Match 531 (1):
Reference (030173 .. 030203, of 34107): |
Subject (024327 .. 024355, of 36359): |
|
resigned and stated the following I was referred to as unpatriotic and my religious beliefs were questioned I served in the U S Army for 11 years and six years on |
resigned and stated I was referred to as unpatriotic and my religious beliefs were questioned I served in the U S Army for 11 years and six years on |
| Match 532 (1):
Reference (030205 .. 030241, of 34107): |
Subject (024357 .. 024392, of 36359): |
|
board Seventeen years of my life have been devoted to public service and my religion is personal It s between me God and my pastor P 810 30 126 30 Bernhard Bubb 4 11 12 B Callahan |
board Seventeen years of my life have been devoted to public service and my religion is personal It s between me God and my pastor P810 30 126 30 Bernhard Bubb 4 11 12 B Callahan |
| Match 533 (1):
Reference (030274 .. 030286, of 34107): |
Subject (023684 .. 023696, of 36359): |
|
their decision to incorporate it as part of the high school biology curriculum |
their decision to incorporate it as part of the high school biology curriculum |
| Match 534 (1):
Reference (030320 .. 030333, of 34107): |
Subject (024428 .. 024441, of 36359): |
|
preparing a statement to be read to students before the evolution unit in biology |
preparing a statement to be read to students before the evolution unit in biology |
| Match 535 (1):
Reference (030334 .. 030343, of 34107): |
Subject (000820 .. 000831, of 36359): |
|
commenced The persuasive evidence presented at trial demonstrates that the |
o 1 The evidence presented by plaintiffs at trial demonstrates that the |
| Match 536 (1):
Reference (030341 .. 030361, of 34107): |
Subject (024595 .. 024618, of 36359): |
|
demonstrates that the final version of the statement communicated a very different message about the theory of evolution than the language |
o 247 Baksa testified that the final version of the statement communicated a very different message about the theory of evolution than the language |
| Match 537 (1):
Reference (030377 .. 030392, of 34107): |
Subject (024440 .. 024458, of 36359): |
|
initial draft of the statement described Darwin s theory of evolution as the dominant scientific theory |
in biology His first draft of the statement described Darwin s theory of evolution as the dominant scientific theory |
| Match 538 (1):
Reference (030377 .. 030396, of 34107): |
Subject (024440 .. 024461, of 36359): |
|
initial draft of the statement described Darwin s theory of evolution as the dominant scientific theory however the Board removed |
in biology His first draft of the statement described Darwin s theory of evolution as the dominant scientific theory The Board removed |
| Match 539 (1):
Reference (030398 .. 030428, of 34107): |
Subject (024463 .. 024491, of 36359): |
|
language from the final version D 91 36 22 24 Baksa Second Baksa s draft stated that there are gaps in Darwin s theory for which there is yet no evidence |
language from the final version D91 36 22 24 Baksa s draft also stated that there are gaps in Darwin s theory for which there is yet no evidence |
| Match 540 (1):
Reference (030431 .. 030441, of 34107): |
Subject (024497 .. 024506, of 36359): |
|
Board selectively edited out the word yet so that the statement |
Board edited out the word yet so that the statement |
| Match 541 (1):
Reference (030451 .. 030468, of 34107): |
Subject (024478 .. 024495, of 36359): |
|
there are gaps in Darwin s theory for which there is no evidence D 91 36 26 28 |
there are gaps in Darwin s theory for which there is yet no evidence D91 36 26 28 |
| Match 542 (1):
Reference (030483 .. 030499, of 34107): |
Subject (024536 .. 024553, of 36359): |
|
suggested that language be added that there is a significant amount of evidence supporting Darwin s theory |
suggested that language be added that stated there is a significant amount of evidence supporting Darwin s theory |
| Match 543 (1):
Reference (030507 .. 030519, of 34107): |
Subject (024607 .. 024619, of 36359): |
|
statement about the scientific theory of evolution he removed such language because he |
a very different message about the theory of evolution than the language he |
| Match 544 (1):
Reference (030540 .. 030561, of 34107): |
Subject (024628 .. 024648, of 36359): |
|
final version of the statement prepared by Defendants to be read to students in ninth grade biology class states as follows The |
final version of the statement prepared by defendants to be read to students in 9 th grade biology class stated The |
| Match 545 (1):
Reference (030564 .. 030595, of 34107): |
Subject (024650 .. 024681, of 36359): |
|
Standards require students to learn about Darwin s Theory of Evolution and eventually to take a standardized test of which evolution is a part Because Darwin s Theory is a theory it |
standards require students to learn about Darwin s Theory of Evolution and to eventually take a standardized test of which evolution is a part Because Darwin s Theory is a theory it |
| Match 546 (1):
Reference (030598 .. 030664, of 34107): |
Subject (024684 .. 024750, of 36359): |
|
be tested as new evidence is discovered The Theory is not a fact Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence A theory is defined as a well tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations Intelligent Design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin s view The reference book Of Pandas and People is available for students |
being tested as new evidence is discovered The Theory is not a fact Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence A theory is defined as a well tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin s view The reference book Of Pandas and People is available for students |
| Match 547 (1):
Reference (030657 .. 030678, of 34107): |
Subject (010882 .. 010903, of 36359): |
|
Of Pandas and People is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually involves |
Of Pandas and People is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves |
| Match 548 (1):
Reference (030682 .. 030719, of 34107): |
Subject (024778 .. 024819, of 36359): |
|
any theory students are encouraged to keep an open mind The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life to individual students and their families As a Standards driven district class instruction focuses upon preparing students to |
any theory students are encouraged to keep an open mind The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life up to individual students and their families As a standards driven district class instruction focuses on the standards and preparing students to |
| Match 549 (1):
Reference (030729 .. 030741, of 34107): |
Subject (024827 .. 024844, of 36359): |
|
on January 6 2005 the teachers sent a memo to the Board requesting |
o 249 On January 6 2005 the teachers sent a memo to the Board by which they requested |
| Match 550 (1):
Reference (030745 .. 030757, of 34107): |
Subject (024847 .. 024860, of 36359): |
|
released from any obligation to read the statement 36 97 Linker The memo |
release them from any obligation to read the statement 36 97 Linker The memo |
| Match 551 (1):
Reference (030840 .. 030858, of 34107): |
Subject (024865 .. 024883, of 36359): |
|
that reading the statement violates our responsibilities as professional educators as set forth in the Code of Professional Practice |
that reading the statement violates our responsibilities as professional educators as set forth in the Code of Professional Practice |
| Match 552 (1):
Reference (030921 .. 030956, of 34107): |
Subject (024929 .. 024964, of 36359): |
|
To refer the students to Of Pandas and People as if it is a scientific resource breaches my ethical obligation to provide them with scientific knowledge that is supported by recognized scientific proof or theory P |
To refer the students to Of Pandas and People as if it is a scientific resource breaches my ethical obligation to provide them with scientific knowledge that that is supported by recognized proof or theory P121 |
| Match 553 (1):
Reference (030965 .. 030978, of 34107): |
Subject (024965 .. 024981, of 36359): |
|
to read the statement to ninth graders at Dover High School in January 2005 |
o 250 The defendants read the statement to ninth graders at Dover high school in January 2005 |
| Match 554 (1):
Reference (030993 .. 031004, of 34107): |
Subject (025014 .. 025027, of 36359): |
|
35 38 Baksa The administrators read the statement again in June 2005 |
35 38 Baksa o 251 The administrators read the statement again in June 2005 |
| Match 555 (1):
Reference (031005 .. 031024, of 34107): |
Subject (025032 .. 025052, of 36359): |
|
By that time Defendants had modified the statement to refer to other unnamed books in the library that relate to |
By that time the defendants had modified the statement to refer to other unnamed books in the library that relate to |
| Match 556 (1):
Reference (031027 .. 031037, of 34107): |
Subject (025056 .. 025066, of 36359): |
|
Pandas remains the only book identified by name in the statement |
Pandas remains the only book identified by name in the statement |
| Match 557 (1):
Reference (031044 .. 031066, of 34107): |
Subject (025078 .. 025097, of 36359): |
|
the other books can be found in the library including whether they are placed near Pandas P 131 35 40 42 43 Baksa |
the other books can be found in the library including whether they are placed near Pandas 35 42 43 Baksa |
| Match 558 (1):
Reference (031082 .. 031099, of 34107): |
Subject (025179 .. 025192, of 36359): |
|
a newsletter to the entire Dover community in February 2005 which was prepared in conjunction with the TMLC |
a newsletter to the entire Dover community which was prepared in conjunction with TMLC |
| Match 559 (1):
Reference (031143 .. 031164, of 34107): |
Subject (025703 .. 025727, of 36359): |
|
to the harm caused by the Board s ID Policy on their children fam ilies and themselves in consistent but personal ways |
o 256 Plaintiffs described the harm caused by the Board s policy on their children their families and themselves in consistent but uniquely personal ways |
| Match 560 (1):
Reference (031169 .. 031219, of 34107): |
Subject (025733 .. 025784, of 36359): |
|
is an inherently religious concept and that its inclusion in the District s science curriculum interferes with their rights to teach their children about religion 3 118 19 Kitzmiller 4 13 15 B Callahan 6 77 78 C Rehm 6 106 Eveland 16 26 30 Stough 17 147 48 Leib Plaintiffs |
is an inherently religious concept and that its inclusion in the district s science curriculum interferes with their rights to teach their children about religion 3 118 119 Kitzmiller 4 13 15 Callahan 6 77 78 C Rehm 6 106 Eveland 16 26 30 Stough 17 147 48 Leib o 257 Plaintiff |
| Match 561 (1):
Reference (031220 .. 031238, of 34107): |
Subject (025947 .. 025968, of 36359): |
|
additionally testified that their children confront challenges to their religious beliefs at school because of the Board s actions |
o 258 Plaintiffs also testified that their children confront challenges to their religious beliefs at school because of the Board s actions |
| Match 562 (1):
Reference (031274 .. 031283, of 34107): |
Subject (026155 .. 026164, of 36359): |
|
Joel Leib whose family has lived in Dover for generations |
Joel Leib whose family has lived in Dover for generations |
| Match 563 (1):
Reference (031301 .. 031349, of 34107): |
Subject (026168 .. 026216, of 36359): |
|
Well it s driven a wedge where there hasn t been a wedge before People are afraid to talk to people for fear and that s happened to me They re afraid to talk to me because I m on the wrong side of the fence 17 146 47 |
Well it s driven a wedge where there hasn t been a wedge before People are afraid to talk to people for fear and that s happened to me They re afraid to talk to me because I m on the wrong side of the fence 17 146 147 |
| Match 564 (1):
Reference (031351 .. 031431, of 34107): |
Subject (026217 .. 026290, of 36359): |
|
Moreover Board members and teachers opposing the curriculum change and its implementation have been confronted directly First Casey Brown testified that following her opposition to the curriculum change on October 18 2004 Buckingham called her an atheist and Bonsell told her that she would go to hell 7 94 95 8 32 C Brown Second Angie Yingling was coerced into voting for the curriculum change by Board members accusing her of being an atheist and un Christian 15 95 97 Sneath |
o 261 Board members opposing the curriculum change and its implementation have been confronted directly Casey Brown testified that following her opposition to the curriculum change on October 18 Buckingham called her an atheist and Bonsell told her she would go to hell 7 94 95 8 32 Angie Yingling was coerced into voting for the curriculum change by board members accusing her of being an atheist and un Christian 15 95 97 Sneath |
| Match 565 (1):
Reference (031351 .. 031443, of 34107): |
Subject (026217 .. 026300, of 36359): |
|
Moreover Board members and teachers opposing the curriculum change and its implementation have been confronted directly First Casey Brown testified that following her opposition to the curriculum change on October 18 2004 Buckingham called her an atheist and Bonsell told her that she would go to hell 7 94 95 8 32 C Brown Second Angie Yingling was coerced into voting for the curriculum change by Board members accusing her of being an atheist and un Christian 15 95 97 Sneath In addition both Bryan Rehm and Fred Callahan have been confronted in |
o 261 Board members opposing the curriculum change and its implementation have been confronted directly Casey Brown testified that following her opposition to the curriculum change on October 18 Buckingham called her an atheist and Bonsell told her she would go to hell 7 94 95 8 32 Angie Yingling was coerced into voting for the curriculum change by board members accusing her of being an atheist and un Christian 15 95 97 Sneath Both Bryan Rehm and Fred Callahan have been confronted in |
| Match 566 (1):
Reference (031453 .. 031462, of 34107): |
Subject (026304 .. 026313, of 36359): |
|
4 93 96 B Rehm 8 115 16 F Callahan |
4 93 96 B Rehm 8 115 16 F Callahan |
| Match 567 (1):
Reference (031685 .. 031704, of 34107): |
Subject (034418 .. 034438, of 36359): |
|
relied solely on legal advice from two organizations with demonstrably religious cultural and legal missions the Discovery Institute and the |
relied solely on legal advice from two organizations with religious cultural and legal missions i e the Discovery Institute and the |
| Match 568 (1):
Reference (031984 .. 032006, of 34107): |
Subject (031495 .. 031517, of 36359): |
|
that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board s real purpose which was to promote religion |
that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board s real purpose which was to promote religion |
| Match 569 (1):
Reference (032408 .. 032430, of 34107): |
Subject (034982 .. 035005, of 36359): |
|
The effect of Defendants actions in adopting the curriculum change was to impose a religious view of biological origins into the biology course |
The effect of the defendants actions in adopting the curriculum change was to impose a religious view of biological origins into the biology course |
| Match 570 (1):
Reference (032421 .. 032436, of 34107): |
Subject (034950 .. 034965, of 36359): |
|
a religious view of biological origins into the biology course in violation of the Establishment Clause |
a religious view of biological origins into the biology course in violation of the Establishment Clause |
| Match 571 (1):
Reference (032667 .. 032678, of 34107): |
Subject (034915 .. 034923, of 36359): |
|
of Pennsylvanians long before the first amendment to the United States Constitution |
of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution |
| Match 572 (1):
Reference (032905 .. 032918, of 34107): |
Subject (006870 .. 006878, of 36359): |
|
that the theory of evolution represents good science is overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific |
that the theory of evolution is the best scientific |
| Match 573 (1):
Reference (033254 .. 033265, of 34107): |
Subject (035083 .. 035094, of 36359): |
|
preserve the separation of church and state mandated by the Establishment Clause |
preserve the separation of church and state mandated by the Establishment Clause |
| Match 574 (1):
Reference (033263 .. 033274, of 34107): |
Subject (034912 .. 034923, of 36359): |
|
the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution |
the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution |
| Match 575 (1):
Reference (033272 .. 033282, of 34107): |
Subject (034925 .. 034937, of 36359): |
|
United States Constitution and Art I 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution |
U S C 1983 and Art I Sec 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution |
| Match 576 (1):
Reference (033305 .. 033329, of 34107): |
Subject (035121 .. 035144, of 36359): |
|
from requiring teachers to denigrate or disparage the scientific theory of evolution and from requiring teachers to refer to a religious alternative theory known as |
from requiring teachers to denigrate or disparage the scientific theory of evolution and from requiring teachers to refer to an alternative theory known as |
| Match 577 (1):
Reference (033334 .. 033358, of 34107): |
Subject (035154 .. 035178, of 36359): |
|
issue a declaratory judgment that Plaintiffs rights under the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have been violated by Defendants actions |
issue a declaratory judgment that plaintiffs rights under the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have been violated by defendants actions |
| Match 578 (1):
Reference (033334 .. 033360, of 34107): |
Subject (035154 .. 035178, of 36359): |
|
issue a declaratory judgment that Plaintiffs rights under the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have been violated by Defendants actions Defendants actions |
issue a declaratory judgment that plaintiffs rights under the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have been violated by defendants actions |
| Match 579 (1):
Reference (033360 .. 033415, of 34107): |
Subject (035182 .. 035242, of 36359): |
|
actions in violation of Plaintiffs civil rights as guaranteed to them by the Constitution of the United States and 42 U S C 1983 subject Defendants to liability with respect to injunctive and declaratory relief but also for nominal damages and the reasonable value of Plaintiffs attorneys services and costs incurred in vindicating Plaintiffs constitutional rights |
actions of the defendants in violation of Plaintiffs civil rights as guaranteed to them by the Constitution of the United States and 42 U S C 1983 subjects defendants to liability not only with respect to injunctive and declaratory relief but also for nominal damages and the reasonable value of plaintiffs attorneys services and costs incurred in vindicating plaintiffs constitutional rights |
| Match 580 (1):
Reference (033465 .. 033474, of 34107): |
Subject (034925 .. 034938, of 36359): |
|
United States and Art I 3 of the Constitution of |
U S C 1983 and Art I Sec 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution o |
| Match 581 (1):
Reference (033925 .. 033971, of 34107): |
Subject (013915 .. 013961, of 36359): |
|
Casey Brown testified she recalled that Bonsell expressed a desire to look into bringing prayer and faith back into the schools that Bonsell mentioned the Bible and creationism and felt there should be a fair and balanced presentation within the curriculum Trial Tr vol 7 C Brown |
Casey Brown testified that she recalled that Bonsell expressed a desire to look into bringing prayer and faith back into the schools that Bonsell mentioned the Bible and creationism and felt there should be a fair and balanced presentation within the curriculum 7 17 18 C Brown |
| Match 582 (1):
Reference (033980 .. 034058, of 34107): |
Subject (015133 .. 015214, of 36359): |
|
an email to one of the social studies teachers on October 19 2004 the day after the Board passed the resolution at issue Baksa said all kidding aside be careful what you ask for I ve been given a copy of the Myth of Separation by David Barton to review from Board members Social Studies curriculum is next year Feel free to borrow my copy to get an idea where the board is coming from 36 14 Baksa P |
an email to one of the social studies teachers on October 19 2004 the day after the Board passed the resolution at issue in this case Baksa said all kidding aside be careful what you ask for I ve been given a copy of the Myth of Separation by David Barton to review from board members Social Studies curriculum is next year Feel free to borrow my copy to get an idea where the board is coming from 36 14 Baksa P91 |